Skip to Content

Is the AirPort Extreme worth the price?

airport extreme from the back

A friend was looking to replace her wireless router, and I suggested a refurbished AirPort Extreme. New units sell for around US$180, but refurbished models from Apple are $130. Still, that's significantly more expensive than the average Linksys router you'll find at Walmart or Best Buy. Is it worth it?

There's no scientific answer to that question, and reasonable people can disagree, but I will share my experiences and my decisions. First, I don't claim that my knowledge is exhaustive of all makes and models. I have used several Linksys models (including some with DD-WRT), a few Netgear models and a few Belkin ones. I have also used AirPort Extreme units since the days when they looked like spaceships. In every case, the non-Apple hardware ended up being replaced with Apple hardware. The only thing that ever replaced Apple hardware was newer Apple hardware, not because the older model had worn out or stopped working, but because newer models came with new features.

I have found two main differences between Apple and non-Apple hardware: stability and features. Stability means I don't worry about it locking up, becoming unresponsive or simply ceasing to work until I unplug it. While I routinely had to make sure to keep a paperclip next to the other routers, the only time I do a full reset on my AirPort equipment is when I move it to a new location and want to start with a clean slate. It's hard to overemphasize this point, especially if you're putting this somewhere difficult to access. So far my favorite installation place for a more reliable AirPort Extreme has been at my mom's house, which has eliminated phone calls from her telling me that she can't get online because "the internet is down."

After stability comes several important features, each of which are important to me and add to the AirPort Extreme's value.

AirPort Extreme features

A USB port has been present on the AirPort Extreme for quite awhile, originally intended to make any USB printer available across the network. At a time when network printers were expensive, this alone was a great feature. Wireless print servers also used to cost around $100, which made this feature well worth the extra cost. They are now available for less, but most routers still do not include this feature. The AirPort Extreme's USB port can also share a USB hard drive across a network. Some people have even connected a hub to it and connected several USB devices, but I haven't had any first-hand experience with that.

Many Wi-Fi routers now offer "802.11n" speeds, but with an important caveat: if you connect slower devices (i.e. 802.11g or 802.11b) to your "mixed" 802.11n network, it will degrade performance. Also, to get the most benefit from the 802.11n networks, many people prefer to set up 802.11n networks using the "5.0 GHz" frequency, which is less crowded as the 2.4Ghz frequency, but is also used by many cordless phones, baby monitors, and other common devices. Unfortunately, even some new devices (such as iPhones!) can't access 5.0Ghz 802.11n networks. Given the fact that most people have a mix of devices, most will setup "mixed" 802.11n networks on the 2.4 GHz frequency, meaning that you often won't get very good 802.11n speeds.

Newer AirPort Extreme units offer a solution to this problem by allowing you to setup a "simultaneous dual-band network" which, as you might have guessed, let's you create one network for your older pre-802.11.n devices, or devices which can't access 5.0GHZ and create a separate "pure" 802.11n 5.0Ghz network. I did that at home and suddenly streaming to my AppleTV worked much better and more reliably, as did transferring large files between computers. That is not a feature that you will find on most other routers. If you live somewhere with a lot of Wi-Fi units around you (such as an apartment building), you may find that dramatically improves your Wi-Fi network's performance.

Another nice feature on the newest AirPort Extreme units is the ability to create a "guest" network. This will allow people to get online, without having to give them access to your main network. If you're one of those folks who are willing to share your Internet connection with your neighbors, but want to keep them from being able to access your local network, this is a good feature for you. Or setup a separate password-protected network for friends to use when they come over.

A feature which many people might not use (but which was important to me), is the wired Gigabit Ethernet connection that the AirPort offers. If you connect your computers to the AirPort using Ethernet cables, you can achieve much higher data transfer speeds across your local network.

There are some other "power user" features such as DHCP reservations (a method to always assign the same IP address to the same computer when it connects to the network) which can be crucial in some situations where port-forwarding is being used. You can also give timed control access to the network using MAC addresses. Want to make sure your kids aren't spending all night online? Have the AirPort limit the hours they are able to access the Wi-Fi network. (No, it's not foolproof, but for most people it will be sufficient.)

Drawbacks

The AirPort Extreme is not without some potential drawbacks. The first is that it only includes three LAN ports, while most other routers include 4. This is a definite improvement over the original AirPort Extremes, which only included one. I consider this a "potential" drawback, because in reality I suspect that most people will not need more than three.

A slightly more annoying shortcoming is that there is no web interface to the AirPort Extreme. All configuration is done via AirPort Utility, which means that you can't check the status or any settings using your iPhone or iPad. That's a minor annoyance, but one that I have run into on occasion.

One important note is that the unit does tend to run warm or even hot, so make that that you give it proper ventilation. I would recommend that you avoid putting anything on top or or underneath it, and make sure it rests on a hard surface.

About the only features that I have ever missed on the AirPort are the ability to prioritize traffic and the ability to block access to certain websites or protocols. If you are looking to, for example, block the use of bittorrent on your network, the AirPort Extreme will not help you. Nor will it help you make sure that your VoIP traffic gets highest priority.

For me, it's worth it

I buy Apple's Wi-Fi hardware for the same reason that I buy its computer hardware: it works better than many competitors' products, has been more reliable, and doesn't require me to spend a lot of time maintaining it. Yes, you can find a cheaper router, just like you could buy a cheaper laptop than the MacBook Air I'm using to write this article.

I'm sure that many people who use cheaper routers find that they work fine for their needs, just like I am sure there are some people who are very happy with the $400 laptop deal they found in the Sunday paper. But I'm also sure that there are many people who struggle with frustrating issues related to their Wi-Fi networks and never realize that they might have a much better experience with better hardware.

Image via Apple.com.



Categories

Accessories

A friend was looking to replace her wireless router, and I suggested a refurbished AirPort Extreme. New units sell for around US$180,...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

101 Comments

Filter by:
Digitarius

Whether or not it's worth it is down to your environment.

I had a DIR-655 hooked to a Gigabit network that worked magnificently when I lived in a house not near any others. When I moved to a more tightly packed subdivision, though, that 2.5GHz band was just too crowded. The 655 couldn't reliably keep me on Xbox Live using an Airport Express as a bridge, no matter what settings I tried.

So, I bought an AEBS and set up a 5GHz network, and it absolutely rocks. It's fast and rock-solid. I ended up missing the extra features on the DIR-655, though. Packet shaping and DynDNS support, namely. So I've ended up using the AEBS only as an access point and Time Capsule using an external HD- all my routing is still done by the DIR-655, which also hosts a separate 2.4GHz network for non-N clients.

April 12 2011 at 8:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Frank

Though I'm still using my Linksys WRT54GS (it's been rock solid for years), I have an Apple 1TB Time Capsule (TC) (a.k.a., Airport Extreme + internal HD). The first one died like clockwork right around 18 months, but as I had AppleCare on my iMac, Apple replaced it without issue. So I'm well acquainted with feature sets.

The two features I think Apple has handled well are

1. WDS, letting you extend your network quickly and easily (vs. with a Linksys having to blow 3rd party firmware like DD-WRT/etc. into each unit); and
2. the USB port for hooking up an external HD.

In fact, something no one has mentioned yet is that unlike most other routers which even offer such a feature, Apple's TC and AE let you hook up an HFS+ or FAT32 formatted HD.

"Big deal," you're thinking. But think about it. Even if your TC/AE dies, all you do is bring that HD over to your Mac or PC and you're golden.

With most other routers, they require formatting the external HD to their expected file system (often Ext3 as many such devices are Linux-based). And in some cases, the HDs are locked to the device, meaning the HD is useless if the router dies. You'd have to have an identical unit to even have a chance to get at your data, or at least be Linux/file system proficient to get at it.

I've tapped this feature many times, including loading up a Drobo using FW800 connected to my Mac, then once all the files were in place, slinging the Drobo off the TC. Works like a champ.

Anyway, I'm not saying the Airport Extreme is necessarily the best. I'd just say for Mac users (and Windows users to a lesser extent) it has a few features well worth considering. If you're a Linux user, then it won't be the ideal solution for multiple reasons, not least of which the Airport Utility binary program only exists for Mac OS X and Windows.

And yes, I think that sucks, too. I much prefer simple web-interfaces. However, keeping Apple's focus on user simplicity in mind, one thing that is nice about Airport Utility is that it just finds your AEs/TCs, whereas with Linksys/etc. you have to know what the default IP address is, basically requiring reading a it more of the setup manual and/or knowing more about TCP/IP addressing. For me this is no issue, but for many folks, networking is intimidating.

April 05 2011 at 6:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
William Orellana

I think one of my favorite features is being able to extend your network connection wirelessly to several Airport Express devices. Yes, it is expensive but well worth and it helps prevent nasty wiring everywhere. I have my main Airport Extreme which extends the connection to my bedroom. I then connect Bose speakers to the Airport Express and stream music to it using Airplay.

April 05 2011 at 9:51 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Screw

Very nice article. I've used my AirPort Extreme and Expresses since 3-4 years now. They work very well and once set up you never have to look at it.

April 05 2011 at 4:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Charles Quenneville

My airport extreme stopped working after just 3 years. I went to the Apple Store and they confirmed that it just died. They didn't even offer me a rebate on another purchase. I was very disappointed.

April 05 2011 at 12:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
djzapp78

Been using an AirPort Extreme for a few month now and it is sweet!! Had a linksys router that would give me major headaches. Streaming is wonderful to 2 ATV2's and multiple other devices.

April 04 2011 at 11:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sean Peters

Current Time Capsule user, previous WRT-54G user. While I switched to the TC because of the features, I did use the WRT-54G for many years, both before and after flashing to DD-WRT. I can honestly say that over those several years of use, I never, not even once, had to reboot the router. I cannot say the same for the Time Capsule. Although on the problems seemed to be fixed after the first few firmware upgrades to the TC, right after I bought the thing I couldn't make it a week without it locking up.

So at least for me, the 54G was notably more reliable. Just a data point.

April 04 2011 at 10:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
chromeronin

I'm considering one. My DLink router died, so I got a Linksys to replace it. This kept crashing unless I reduced the frame size, and even then, still crasheds every now and then. So I replace it with a Belkin. This was fin unless I torrented, which would kill it unless I limited max connections on my client.
I have seen amy other models of AP and router announced, but you can easily buy the exact model you want out here in NZ. However, whatever Apple are selling as their latest version is ALWAYS available on the Apple web store, and they always deliver when they say they will, and I can talk to a human support operator if there are problems.
What I dont like: You have to use windows or mac to set the sucker up, not a browser like everyone else. 8( minor issue though, just annoying.

April 04 2011 at 8:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Steve

Only one thing could improve the Airport Extreme: if it had a built-in DSL modem. My Airport Extreme is solid as a rock and like many here have contested it's money very well spent. However, it's weak link is that it still needs a third-party modem to get onto the internet and we all know how reliable those are.

April 04 2011 at 8:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
gnomehole

Doesn't the airport still require a certain 10.x address internally?

I've been 10.2.1.X since the 90s... I'm not about to re-ip my entire internal network because Apple has this locked down.. (and why?)

If they fix this, I'll buy one. I like Apple, but thats the dumbest thing I've ever seen.... you should be able to select your internal network on any IP address.

April 04 2011 at 8:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to gnomehole's comment
TJ Luoma

The AirPort Extreme can use 192.168.x.x or 10.0.x.x or 172.16.x.x.

I'm not sure why they don't allow 10.x.x.x.

April 04 2011 at 8:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.