Skip to Content

Three reasons iWeb may be doomed

I like iWeb. Apple's website creation tool is easy to use, creates great looking sites, and has been installed on just about every new Mac since 2006. In fact, I've written about iWeb for Take Control Books, and I often recommend iWeb to Mac users who are seeking a powerful website tool but don't want to face a tough learning curve.

However, I have a nagging feeling that we may have seen the last of iWeb. The app wasn't updated as part of the iLife '11 release, and Apple remains mum on the future of iWeb.

I'll be the first to say that I hope I'm wrong, but there are three factors that probably point to the demise of iWeb.

1) Facebook: When iWeb first appeared as part of iLife '06, Facebook had yet to become a phenomenon (the service as we know it officially opened on September 26, 2006). Part of the initial attraction of iWeb was the ability for Mac users to easily create web pages for sharing photos, videos and personal experiences. You'd launch the application on your Mac, pull photos from your iPhoto library, type up a little story and update your site, which was usually hosted on MobileMe. Apple later added Facebook integration to iWeb, so anything you published on your iWeb site also could update your Facebook page.

Well, given the ubiquity of Facebook (as of April 2010, about 41.6 percent of the US population was estimated to have a Facebook account) and the ability to update your followers on what's happening in your life from just about any connected device, does the world really need a Mac-only website design tool with limited connectivity and a reputation for creating bloated HTML?

Facebook has probably done more to eliminate the use case for iWeb than any other factor. It's free (iWeb prefers MobileMe or third-party hosting, although you can use it with a free Dropbox account in a pinch), it's accessible from any type of computer and most mobile devices, and it does exactly what most people were using iWeb for -- posts photos, videos and personal updates.

2) Content Management Systems: For companies that may have a mix of Macs and PCs, it doesn't make a lot of sense to use a Mac-only tool to create and maintain a website. Many firms have chosen content management systems like WordPress, Joomla and Drupal to create powerful websites and blogs. Not only can those sites be updated from any computer with a modern web browser, but the Apache/MySQL/PHP framework that powers these content management systems means that added functionality is just a plug-in away.

Sure, iWeb's nine widgets and ability to add HTML snippets provide a surprising amount of flexibility, but that's nothing compared to the thousands of plug-ins that have been developed for the big content management systems. Those systems are also supported by thousands of independent developers and designers who have created beautiful and functional themes. The handful of iWeb theme developers who are supporting the app just can't compare.

3) iWeb just isn't mobility-oriented: I alluded to this in my first point, but the fact that iWeb is a Mac-only application at this time could be one of its biggest failures. Yes, there are lightweight MacBook Airs that can run iWeb while you're on the road, but wouldn't it be nice to be able to update an iWeb site from an iOS device? At this time, iWeb doesn't lend itself to mobile updating since it stores the working files for each website locally on a Mac.

Perhaps Apple will surprise us all and bring iWeb into the future with a cloud-based service that is updatable from any device, but I think the app has reached the end of its usefulness. What's your opinion? Do you think that we'll see an update to iWeb concurrent with the launch of other cloud-based MobileMe services? Leave a comment below.



Categories

Software Mac

I like iWeb. Apple's website creation tool is easy to use, creates great looking sites, and has been installed on just about every new...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

61 Comments

Filter by:
Alisia.Buys5530

Cool sharing. Thank you for sharing such an impressive feature of some of the best technology.
http://www.articlespeak.com/nue-science-cell-revival-system-review/

May 03 2011 at 7:51 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Rupert Eden

I use iweb to make professional looking web sites like this www.casasnaareia.com and this www.ruperteden.com and charge 1500 dollars per site I build - fingers crossed Apple keep it going or I am out of business !

April 27 2011 at 12:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bethel.Kollmorgen8165

I don't thinks so. This is horrible.
http://drugmega.com/drugs-65841126/nutraslim-review-and-quick-detox-grab-free-trial-now.html

April 26 2011 at 5:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ylluminate

Well folks, I think everyone missed a recent news blurb on this matter. I believe that we're nearly ready for a serious refresh of iWeb and perhaps, being optimistic, they've taken the long last few years to really get it right.

RapidWeaver does *not* compete with iWeb (running a web and app dev house I can speak for experience), however it's not a general tool for most clients. I've found iWeb good for my own personal sites + sites that a client doesn't want to pay much for, but is willing to pay out the nose for updates. BUT, yes, I think we're in for some interesting days ahead:

http://www.9to5mac.com/59099/apple-patents-iweb-for-ipad/

BUT, if we're not, Flux has the real potential to save us and to eliminate the problems that RapidWeaver and Sandvox have.

April 25 2011 at 3:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
imperahimperah

They'll have to pry it from my cold dead hands

April 24 2011 at 3:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dorjesyber

Ug, please. I tried iWeb when it first came out and went right back to Netscape Composer, now SeaMonkey. Sure it isn't fancy but it generates fairly clean simple HTML 4 code. Haven't touched iWeb seriously since 2006.

April 23 2011 at 10:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David

iWeb and education are a perfect mix. Our students create sites that are posted via FTP to our internal collaborative system. Simple, extremely effective, easy to manage and secure, ie. Ideal for junior primary through to secondary students.
Cloud-based systems add a layer of complexity. We are more interested in the learning that occurs than in the technical proficiency of the software, which is simply a vehicle for the expression of ideas.

April 23 2011 at 5:02 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jenny Ashby

We have used iWeb for 9 yrs with 5-12 yr olds. I like the way you work off line and can pub locally if needed. It is the quickest web creator, drag and drop media. Is there a windows version? However it needs mobile access so idevices can add to the site. I'm hoping they produce something with a mailtoiweb option. Plz!

April 22 2011 at 11:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
LetDown

iWeb is all I use, but it's really frustrating that it's not cloud
based or part of mobileme. Having it depend on my macbook for changes
seems a dated approach to website creation and maintainance. I'd much
rather have it as part of my mobileme account and be able to
update/blog from my iphone or ipad.

I don't want it like facebook at all. I don't want visitors
distracted by facebook-type posts or additions to my site that I don't
approve of.

How many times has a "friend" posted something irrelevant or
unprofessional to your facebook account. I want a professional site
made easy to create and maintain. iWeb was/is perfect for that.

April 22 2011 at 6:48 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Robert

I'd like to see them make it more powerful and able to create more efficient sites (instead of having a folder of the same images copied for each page), and include it with iWork.

April 22 2011 at 4:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.