App for film buffs is a great idea with flawed execution
I am a pretty major film buff. I even wrote a book on a sixties movie producer. So I was pretty excited to hear of Spott, an app that uses augmented reality and your iPhone GPS to find the nearby locations where films and TV shows were shot.
It's a great idea for an app. You can enter Al Pacino and see where his movies were filmed. You can also search by title. You can even get a map that will point you to locations anywhere in the world.
Alas, the app is pretty thin in the data department. While there are lots of movies listed, there is an awful lot missing. Here in Southern Arizona, endless westerns were produced. Tombstone, Gunfight at the OK Corral, The Trial of Billy Jack, Easy Rider. The list goes on and on. What does Spott list for this area? Nothing. Nada. Utah is completely empty, and Utah has been the home of hundreds of films.
As I said, this is a great idea for an app. The developers let you sign up and add data that is missing, and even submit photos of yourself at movie locations but frankly, it's not my job to do that. Even though movie locations are not the main purpose of the IMDB app, you can get that information from there, but it's not designed to let you search by location in the iOS versions.
I would say Spott is a good start, but at US $2.99 I'd like a more complete database, and more images. Spott bills itself as the 'ultimate tool for film fans' but it still has a way to go to meet that description. I'm hoping the developers will step it up a bit and make Spott all that it could be. Spott runs as a universal app on the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch and requires iOS 3.1.3 or greater.
Share
Categories
I am a pretty major film buff. I even wrote a book on a sixties movie producer. So I was pretty excited to hear of Spott, an app that...
Add a Comment
TUAW is a damn joke for deleting my comment. Get a sense of humor. You just lost a reader.
July 18 2011 at 1:05 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply"(On an unrelated side note, comments suck on the new TUAW, having to go through the OAuth process everytime is insane)."
I actually only went through the hassle of logging in again just to express how much I agree with Dave's comment…! Commenting on TUAW was bad before and now it's just an updated version of bad…!
Move to Disqus already, pleeeeaaase…!!!
Seconded on the Disqus vote! I don't understand why all the AOL blogs aren't just standardized under one comment system.
July 17 2011 at 7:48 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyYeah, what's up with making me authorize EVERY-SINGLE-TIME-I-POST? Can't it set some cookies or something?!
July 17 2011 at 11:50 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIn defence of the developers, that's an awful lot of data you're asking for (for only $2.99). That's not something that's available via IMDb, and even if it were, it's not data they can just use. It costs a minimum of $15000 to use any data from IMDb, and it goes up from there.
At app store prices, no one can afford to work with IMDb when an app launches because it's unlikely an app will make enough money to cover the licensing, never mind make a profit.
If you like the concept of the app, start adding data and enhance the app. IMDb started as a user contributed database too. If you know of a lot of films in Utah, add them. The app will only work if people add what they know.
That being said, it might be a good idea for the developers to offer the app for free to start so that it can get enough users to use the app and add the data it needs to be useful.
(On an unrelated side note, comments suck on the new TUAW, having to go through the OAuth process everytime is insane).
I have to agree. I designed a little trip planner app with the lofty goal of providing, well, trip planning for every city in the United States and beyond that included a subway, trolley, or other rail based network. I did it, and added Canada, Mexico, and some cities in Europe, but gosh it was hard! Collecting and preparing the data took far, far longer than writing the app itself. Not everyone supports the General Transit Feed Specification, and those that do do not necesarily publish it for general use. And maps? Don't get me started! For instance, London charges £1,000 for the privilege of showing the Underground map. As Mr Wood said, it's just not financially viable to use costly data in an app when there is no guarantee of generating revenue.
My hat goes off for these developers to build what they have built. I'm sure with some more time (and interest in the product) they'll add more data and really liven up the app's offerings. But getting that data in the first place, and getting it into a standard format takes time and loads of energy.
Deals of the Day
more deals- Acoustic Research Digital Photo Frame with iPod Dock for $50 + free shipping
- Targus Truss Case for iPad and iPad 2 for $15 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone 4 8GB for Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint for $50 + pickup at Best Buy
- Unlocked iPhone 4S 16GB for GSM (AT&T, T-Mobile) for $619 + free shipping
- Apple iMac Core i7 Quad 3.4GHz 27" w/ 24GB RAM, 2TB HDD for $2,677 + $29 s&h
- Used Apple Magic Mouse for $36 + $4 s&h
6 Comments