Skip to Content

Review: Sonos Play:3 speaker system

Sonos was nice enough to loan me the new Play:3 wireless speaker system that I mentioned earlier this week, and now I've had a chance to listen. It's good. Very good.

If you're unfamiliar with Sonos, here's a bit of background. The company began in 2003 with an idea of providing whole house wireless systems for much less than custom install jobs. Sonos has been Mac-friendly from the start, a Sonos device connects to your iTunes library and then with several additional pieces you your music where you need it. Control can be through a dedicated hardware controller, or even better from a free iPad or iPhone app. Sonos makes what they call ZonePlayers that connect as a component to your HiFi, or models with amplifiers that can drive speakers. Last fall, my colleague Dave Caolo reviewed the Sonos S5, now renamed the Play:5, a standalone music player with built-in amps and speakers.

Now Sonos has an even lower priced entry, the US $299.00 Play:3. It's a one piece speaker system with digital amplifiers. The speaker enclosure is 5.2 x 10.5 x 6.3 inches and weighs a shade under 6 pounds. It can be plugged directly into your router with the supplied ethernet cable and it's ready to go. To use it wirelessly, you get a $50.00 Sonos Bridge unit and plug that into your router. Then put the Play:3 anywhere in the house, and your iTunes library is available, as well as thousands of internet radio stations. You can also access Pandora, and subscriptions music services like Last.fm, Rhapsody, SiriusXM, Stitcher and more.

The Play:3 is a stereo unit, but the drivers are quite close together. I heard a clear stereo effect, but it wasn't a very wide image. Sonos allows two Play:3 units to be placed in a stereo pair mode, so you can separate them as widely as you like. The speakers can be placed vertically or horizontally. Sensors in the enclosure make some adjustments to the sound depending on how the speakers are oriented. The Sonos architecture is very mix and match. You can add a lot of playback units, and they can play music in sync all over the house, or you can have each play different things in different locations. The flexibility is unlimited.

How did it all sound? Really well for such a small box. I listened to Jazz, some hard rock and some classical. Vocals, always a good test, were clear and defined. I listened to some Bach organ music and the stunning Saint-Saëns Symphony #3 for Orchestra, Organ and 2 Pianos the bass was excellent given the size of the drivers.

If you already have a Sonos system and are looking to extend it to a kitchen, night stand or guest bedroom the Play:3 is worthy of serious consideration. If you have been wanting to get a Sonos system started this is a great way to begin. There are lots of ways to get music around your home these days, but I find the Sonos system reliable, elegant and great sounding.

Note: Like a lot of companies, Sonos is struggling a bit with the significant network changes in Lion, and the Sonos software won't play your local iTunes share until a software update. Here is the latest statement from Sonos on the issue.



Categories

Music

Sonos was nice enough to loan me the new Play:3 wireless speaker system that I mentioned earlier this week, and now I've had a chance to...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

9 Comments

Filter by:
astromoose

does it have a line in?

July 25 2011 at 3:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Carl

I don't like that they require a bridge unit for the wireless portion. I'd like to see one that is fully self contained.

July 23 2011 at 6:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Vera Comment

here's the Lion info from their forums - (this is an official post by Sonos - comments disabled)
http://forums.sonos.com/showthread.php?t=23442

..if you've already installed Lion they are offering a chance to test the fix.
Sonos-BetaApplication@sonos.com

otherwise
"We have a candidate solution for the general file sharing problem at this point. We estimate it will take two-to-four weeks to test this, resolve any issues that come up, and release it in a software update."

July 23 2011 at 5:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gary Merinstein

I added this (it arrived yesterday) to my existing Sonos system. I originally switched to Sonos after trying Logitech's Squeezebox system and being disappointed by the instability of the Squeezeserver software (a Perl script) on Windows 7. My home is metal-framed construction making wiring between the floors a bit of a problem so wireless is my preferred solution. So far Sonos does not disappoint: the signal from the bridge remains strong between floors and rebuilding my music archive index is very fast. I'm not looking for head-banger volumes so i would never "crank it up" (for that I use good headphones) - i want all floors, follow me, coverage with effortless SiriusXM integration, without wires which Sonos does better than the others (logitech & sony) I've tried.

July 23 2011 at 2:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tabaloon

I would have to be thoroughly insane to buy this overpriced Bose-clone crap. Not that I would buy Bose, either.

July 23 2011 at 2:14 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to tabaloon's comment
Mr Lizard

What don't you like about it tabaloon?

July 23 2011 at 2:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
haineux

I know people at Sonos, and they view Bose as their main competitor. Bose (last I checked) does not make "wireless speakers", so they've got a big leg up there, but Sonos also wants to sound a lot better than Bose (which some would say is not very hard).

It's a tough market, because anyone who is an audio enthusiast is probably going to wire up their own speakers to an amp and an AirPort Express, and chances are, come out cheaper than $650 for a pair. But that won't be nearly as easy to move from place to place.

July 23 2011 at 4:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to haineux's comment
Gary Merinstein

plus there's not much logic to Sonos' pricing structure: the Play 5 with 5 speakers, amp, wifi receiver is $400 and the Play 3 is $300, the Zoneplayer 120 (amp, wifi, no speakers) is $500, and the Zoneplayer 90 (wifi, no amp, no speakers) is $350. Why would anyone get the Zoneplayer 120? It's designed for people who already have a pair of speakers, but most people have an amp for the speakers they own so they would only need the ZP 90. Sonos needs to restructure their lineup to simplify the choices for people, and fit the ZP120 in appropriately, while making the product line more price competitive with their real competition (which does not include Bose, regardless of Sonos' opinion) of Logitech, Sony and AirPlay (should any AirPlay devices actually come on the market).

July 24 2011 at 11:48 AM Report abuse rate up rate down
DEEmery

A friend used Saint-Saens when he was shopping for high end speakers. The guy in the stereo store said, "Crank it up, it can handle it." My friend shrugged and turned up the volume. At that point (start of the 3rd movement?) where EVERYTHING kicks in from the organ on up, the VU lights on the amp lit up for a millisecond, and then the entire listening room was plunged into darkness. They blew a fuze!

July 23 2011 at 2:06 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.