Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Why you should not be paying for VisualHub (Updated)

VisualHub was a video conversion application popular several years ago. The app was shuttered in 2008, but it continued to work in OS X until Lion rolled out. Lon Seidman, a Visual Hub customer, recently received an email from online payment processor Kagi that offered a Lion-compatible update to the video conversion app. That sounds great, except this email and the US $4.99 payment was not authorized by VisualHub developer Tyler Loch.

Loch did update his app to support Lion, but this new version is available for free from the VisualHub website. Loch even put a warning on his website accusing Kagi of distributing an unauthorized version of vHub Updater and is telling people not to purchase this version. Kagi was the official payment processor for VisualHub when it was an active application so perhaps this is just a misunderstanding and not an attempt by Kagi to fleece VisualHub users. Either way, VisualHub owners should avoid paying Kagi and download the update for free.

Update: [Mike Rose] Seidman spoke to Kagi CEO Kee Nethery about the 'unofficial' VisualHub update tool. According to Nethery, his payment processing company often handles simple support questions for software purchasers, even though the responsibility for support actually rests with the developer.

In the case of VisualHub, since developer Tyler Loch has stopped distributing his app, Kagi pointed users to Loch's patch instructions on the Techspansion site. Despite the fact that the effort to patch the app is minimal, the process of showing the app package contents and replacing three script files was apparently beyond the "comfort level" of many users contacting Kagi for help.

Facing what he describes as a "support nightmare," Nethery took the unprecedented step of building a patcher application that replaced the three script files and also updated the underlying version of ffmpeg used to power the app's compression features. He apparently is frustrated that Loch chose to "walk away from a business" when he stopped developing and selling VisualHub.

Macworld also interviewed Nethery and Loch, with similar comments from the Kagi chairman. Loch, however, points out that while there is an open-source descendant of VisualHub (FilmRedux), the original app and the Lion-specific patch files are still copyrighted and closed-source. Loch had no advance notice of Kagi's intent to bundle and sell his patches and did not give his approval.

While we can sympathize with Kagi's dilemma and the challenge of responding to upset customers, apparently Nethery forgot that VisualHub is not Kagi's product. The unofficial patcher app issued without Loch's permission is a slap in the face for independent developers who work with Kagi, as up until today they probably believed that their apps were theirs to support or abandon as they saw fit.

Whether or not you agree with Loch's decision to close out VisualHub, it is his decision and his alone when to EOL a product. Providing the patches for Lion is a courtesy, not an obligation, and Kagi would be far better off saying "the product is no longer supported, sorry" than pulling this end run. At a bare minimum, a courtesy email to Loch letting him approve or deny permission for the updater app would have been the civil thing to do.

Loch's notes on the Lion patch include a wry comment, "Enjoy VisualHub for a little while longer, until Apple discontinues support for AppleScript Studio apps or 32bit apps or non-sandboxed apps." Clearly the zombie support for this discontinued app is a fragile thing, and it can and will break. What will Kagi do then for its frustrated customers? Nothing -- and for better or worse, that's what it should be doing now.

[Via Lon Seidman]



Categories

Software Mac OS X

VisualHub was a video conversion application popular several years ago. The app was shuttered in 2008, but it continued to work in OS...
 

Featured Comments

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

28 Comments

Filter by:
Joram Oudenaarde

Wow… it's nice that Kagi wants to please it's customers, but not at the expense and without the consent of the original owners. The source code is free, so if they really wanted to help people, provide a néw product and sell that. Using someone else's software directly and providing a half-baked update for it (which, as the article mentions, will break at some point) hurts the original owner and developer.

In short and to put it bluntly, a pretty dick move. In a longer sentence, it's a not well-thought-out move with software that Kagi never had ownership of nor approval to even patch the software.

August 17 2011 at 1:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dan brown

This is really a low blow. Tyler has worked with his customers, me for example, to come up with a solution to continue using VisualHub (and AudialHub) in Lion. He provide me and others with patches and even new optimization links. I was very grateful he took the time and effort for his customers and eventually posted the solutions for free on his site. Something the KAGI never bothered to investigate. I received the email blast from KAGI offering the vHub lion updater and thought it was a further solution from Tyler. But it didn't seem right as his email correspondence with me always had me feeling that it was really lucky that he could get it to work... and any update could break it for good. I forwarded the email I received from KAGI to make sure it was something developed by him. If it was, I was happy to donate the $5 bucks to his cause. I use this product EVERYDAY. It still beats everything out there (even more now with the Rob Leatherwood ffmpeg patch update that Tyler posted on his Techspansion site) Shame on KAGI for not contacting the developer to get permission to contact his customers, create an updater or offer to share the proceeds. I hope this unethical behavior deters other developers from using KAGI for anything. Tyler, good luck and thank you...

August 17 2011 at 12:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Raphael Salgado

VisualHub was the first program I purchased when I got my first Mac in 2007. Still remains to be my most frequently used app. I wish you continued support for it, but I appreciate your workaround for Lion. Good luck and best wishes.

August 16 2011 at 8:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bart S.

I don't get what the problem is with what Kagi did? They spent the time to package up the patch and submit it to the app store, something the original developer didn't do. If they want to sell it for $5, that's their prerogative (people could choose to not buy it). If there's a patch to fix a problem with Adobe Photoshop, even if the fix involves taking a collection of files Adobe provides, does someone need to get permission from Adobe to release the patch for $5? I don't think so (unless there are specific licenses associated with the files).

If they have been answering support requests for the product (probably for the entire span of the product's existence, even while it was being developed actively) it seems disingenuous to complain about a $5 charge for releasing something that fixes the product for a lot of users.

August 16 2011 at 7:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Bart S.'s comment
Michael

Actually, Bart, if the code is copyrighted (which Tyler's code is) and the distributor does not ask permission (which Kagi did not) there is a problem. You can't release 'unofficial patches' for Photoshop using Adobe's code, and you can't do it for VisualHub. (Leaving aside the malware risk)

Remember the AirPrint Hacktivator? It was a cool hack, but it was also using Apple's own code to make the fix -- and that's why it had to be pulled and reengineered.

August 17 2011 at 11:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
James Shannon

VisualHub is great, sat on my dock since April 2008 and use it often:

https://img.skitch.com/20110816-1xbrsju96bh88q1m4umsf8uwk6.png

Love all the tool tip message humour, same in the reg e-mail:

"You might want to write down that code somewhere. It's rather important. You could try memorizing it if you want...

4: You did it! Congratulations! You may now brag to your friends."

Cheers Tyler

August 16 2011 at 5:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to James Shannon's comment
James Shannon

Nostalgia

August 16 2011 at 5:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joshua Nozzi

This truly sounds like a huge lawsuit waiting to be filed... I'd prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.

August 16 2011 at 5:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Joshua Nozzi's comment
Michael

Not sure exactly what the damages would be.

August 16 2011 at 5:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
puhsitch

So...this is illegal? Or is it purely an ethical issue?

August 16 2011 at 4:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to puhsitch's comment
Michael

Well, it's hard to say as I am not a lawyer, but let's think about it.

In principle, if someone gives something away for free, and then I charge money to facilitate setting it up, that's not really illegal. For instance, Firefox is free to download, but I can charge someone an hourly rate to install it on their computer.

August 16 2011 at 5:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael

Inadvertently ended my comment too soon. If you note Techspansion's response in the image, Kagi did use copyrighted code without permission, and did send a mailing to customers without authorization. Those may not be illegal acts but they are definitely skeevy.

August 16 2011 at 5:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Tyler Loch's comment
Michael

The op-ed section at the bottom was by me, but you're welcome!

August 16 2011 at 3:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Michael's comment
Tyler Loch

Thank you, too :p
Seriously.

August 16 2011 at 3:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
Michael

My pleasure. Sorry you got dragged into this mess -- if there's any consolation, the root cause is "people love the product, so..." :-)

August 17 2011 at 11:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down
Joseph Thornton

I mean...I know this was a great app at the time, but there are much better alternatives at the moment that do a superior job to anything VisualHub could ever do.

Permute: Full 64-bit and multi-core (GCD/OpenCL) optimized. Supports all the codecs that VisualHub did and more! They also have great/active customer service and support. - http://fuelcollective.com/permute

Squeeze: This is what all the professionals like Cali Lewis are using now since VisualHub kept getting older and older. - http://www.sorensonmedia.com/

Smart Converter: A free alternative to both that supports converting the most common file formats: http://shedworx.com/smartconverter

August 16 2011 at 2:43 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Joseph Thornton's comment
kingtj

Joseph, yes, and no! One of the main features that was unique to VisualHub was its ability to support Apple's xgrid technology to allow processing of video across multiple Macs on your LAN. (I believe the author had problems with it when Leopard was released with significant changes to xgrid, but it worked in Tiger. Shortly after he promised he was looking into it, in the support forums, it was announced he was going to abandon VisualHub completely.)

Ever since, I've sought out a way to use xgrid with a video conversion package to no avail. I'm not a developer, but I did find a wiki with a lot of technical info on xgrid, and it sounds like in OS X Lion, it has more significant changes which might make it even easier/better to use with a product like this ... but few people seem to have much interest in learning xgrid at all.

August 16 2011 at 5:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to kingtj's comment
Michael

With the new version of Compressor, you should get this functionality as well.

August 17 2011 at 11:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down
cookingscience

A quick Google search by either Tyler Loch or Kelly Hodgkins would have revealed the real culprit. Whoever runs http://www.vhub.biz/ has used the open source code made available by Loch to create an updater, and has set up payment through Kagi.

August 16 2011 at 1:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to cookingscience's comment
Michael

Kagi's chairman has acknowledged that the updater is actually Kagi's work.

August 16 2011 at 2:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Michael's comment
cookingscience

Kagi steals code from its own customers? This isn't a good business model.

August 16 2011 at 7:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
Michael

Think for a moment: Who, aside from Techspansion, had a list of email addresses corresponding to purchasers of VisualHub?

...


...

There it is. Yes, Kagi.

August 16 2011 at 2:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.