Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Editor Walter Murch is feeling better about Final Cut Pro X

When Final Cut Pro X debuted, it caused a stir in the professional video editing world. Long a standard tool for feature film editors, the latest version of Final Cut was designed more for the prosumer, and left some pro editors with a bad taste for the update. In a recent interview with Rick Young of MacVideo, film and sound editor Walter Murch discusses this new role of Final Cut Pro X.

Murch makes several key points about FCPX's role in video literacy and how its friendly interface makes it easy for students and new users to develop video editing skills. Looking beyong consumers, he's also hopeful Apple will gradually beef up the application and let third-party developers create tools that'll make Final Cut Pro X useful for the professional.

He sees FCPX as a tool that will gradually straddle the old world of analog-based non-linear video editing and the new digital-based future. Murch is not sure Apple can pull this off and create a tool that appeals to both the professional and the consumer, but if it does, FCPX could be the foundation for a new NLE ecosystem.

The 20-minute talk is an excellent commentary on the future of Final Cut Pro and film editing, in general. You can watch the full interview on MacVideo's website.

[Via FCP.co]



Categories

Mac OS X

When Final Cut Pro X debuted, it caused a stir in the professional video editing world. Long a standard tool for feature film editors,...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

10 Comments

Filter by:
Faslane

wouldn't mind an update though..heard there was one coming...any idea when or is it here?

Thanks

November 08 2011 at 7:16 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
marcushe

I agree with Yuusharo - when OS X 10.0 was released in the OS 9 days, it was terrible and everyone hated it. But look at OS X today 10 years later.

November 08 2011 at 2:53 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to marcushe's comment
imhutton

You can't compare the two in any way. No multi cam, no audio tracks, no AAF export, this was worse than the MobileMe roll out. There are thousands of production houses that are absolutely screwed over by this application in having to transition out of Apple's pocket and into a new editing platform.

November 08 2011 at 7:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Yuusharo

I've been a defender of FCPX. Yes, it lacks a lot of professional features, and it's inability to manually relink media is a fundamentally flawed and show-stopping problem for a lot of professional and even prosumer workflows. Still, most of the major complaints can be fixed with a major upgrade in a few months, and features will be added back with time.

A clean break from the past had to be made at some point. There was no way the old FCP code could have been moved up to become a modern application. The only real solution was to rewrite from scratch, with both support for modern frameworks that take advantage of every ounce of power in your system, and a new UI that sports a whole new metaphor on how one approaches video editing at a fundamental level. We all laugh and scoff FCPX today, but I have a hunch that 5 years from now Adobe and Avid will be struggling to keep up with their own imitations of FCPX's UI, while Apple has had a head start on building on top the foundation they set with FCPX.

It's not Insanely Great today, but I think we'll all be surprised in a few years with what it will be capable of doing with such a simple interface that anyone can pick up and learn.

November 08 2011 at 1:41 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Gareth Burleigh

Cant wait for part 2, a very well balanced viewpoint on whats become a very touchy subject

November 08 2011 at 1:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Oscar Goldman

"its friendly interface makes it easy for students and new users to develop video editing skills"

Editing wasn't difficult on real NLEs either. People forget that Final Cut Pro's UI has always sucked. FCP X cleaned it up considerably, but then made basic editing nearly impossible by trying to guess what you want to do. Apple and FCP X also mess up new editors by using incorrect terms for things, like "events." Events are the snippets of video in the timeline, as they have been in NLEs since their inception. Clips are the full blob of footage in the bin (which events point to).

Complaining that FCP X isn't usable by professionals begs the response, "Duh. Apple doesn't care about professionals." But Apple should be derided for using incorrect terms and needlessly confusing users who might someday move up to a proper editing system. The existing terminology and basic workflow are easily understood by novices; there was no need to obfuscate them.

November 08 2011 at 1:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
shaunisadirty

That's great. One person in the world likes it. Cooooooooooool.

That still doesn't make it a good product.

November 08 2011 at 10:40 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to shaunisadirty's comment
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.