Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Apple loses bid to keep information sealed in Psystar case

In its ongoing suit against unauthorized Mac clone maker Psystar, Apple has been denied in its bid to keep certain information about OS X sealed from public view. According to Bloomberg, Judge William Alsup noted that information Apple claims are "trade secrets" are already publicly available on the internet from a variety of sources.

Apple attempted to claim that although this information about OS X was already publicly available, since the company itself hadn't confirmed its veracity the information still qualified for trade secret protection. Judge Alsup disagreed, saying, "Apple cannot have this court seal information merely to avoid confirmation that the publicly available sources got it right."

Apple is suing Psystar for copyright infringement over Psystar producing and selling unauthorized clones of the Mac running Apple's proprietary Mac OS X software. Apple successfully obtained a sales injunction against Psystar years ago, and that injunction was recently upheld in court -- a somewhat moot point, as the company hasn't produced any hardware since 2009.



Categories

Apple Mac OS X

In its ongoing suit against unauthorized Mac clone maker Psystar, Apple has been denied in its bid to keep certain information about OS...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

3 Comments

Filter by:
Mabhatter

Not to pick, but this does seem like Psystar had some other agenda here. On the other hand, Psystar, or people involved, we're involved in cracking Apple's OS specifically to circumvent the DMCA. It seems a bit disrespectful of the judge not to keep the records sealed.

Thats a bit like celebrities trying to stop naked pics of themselves without permission, then being told anybody can just request a copy of the case file... Right from the court.

January 04 2012 at 8:18 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Chris Koerner

I'd be curious as to what was in these documents. That is to say, to see what the "publicly available sources" got right.

January 04 2012 at 5:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Chris Koerner's comment
Jones

Probably enough info on how to circumvent the EFI and such, basically what the hackintosh community has been doing by trial & error for years and made its findings public.

January 04 2012 at 8:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.