California Attorney General Rob Bonta has threatened legal action in response to former President Donald Trump’s proposal to impose a 25% tariff on iPhones manufactured outside the United States. The move, perceived as targeting Apple, sparked immediate concern from state officials and tech leaders alike.
Trump suggested that Apple should shift all iPhone production to the U.S. or face steep penalties. This demand comes as Apple continues producing most of its devices in countries like India, where manufacturing infrastructure is already well established.
Apple’s Economic Role in California
Bonta defended Apple, emphasizing the company’s major economic contributions to California. He stated that Apple’s global success has helped boost California’s status as the world’s fourth-largest economy. “We’re proud of California companies, and we want to ensure their rights are protected—especially from federal overreach,” Bonta remarked.
The attorney general criticized Trump’s approach, suggesting it was driven more by political impulse than policy planning. He hinted that inconsistent messaging from the former president could lead to legal uncertainty and economic disruption.
Tariff Policy Under Review
Bonta confirmed his office is currently examining the official tariff language to determine whether Apple and other California-based companies are being unfairly singled out. If the findings support that claim, a lawsuit against the federal government may follow.
In the meantime, Apple remains silent on the issue. The company has historically enjoyed a favorable relationship with Trump, gaining temporary tariff exemptions in the past.
However, Apple lacks the domestic infrastructure to shift iPhone production to the U.S. on short notice. Even chip manufacturer TSMC faced years of delays and labor shortages while building its Arizona plant.
Broader Impact on Tech Industry
Though the tariff plan initially appeared to focus on Apple, Trump later stated it would apply to all foreign-made smartphones, including Samsung. Still, critics argue that Apple is the primary target, given its visibility and economic influence.
As the situation evolves, California’s stance signals growing tension between state governments and federal trade policy—a divide that could define tech manufacturing’s future in America.
