Apple has filed a reply brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming that recent court-ordered changes to its App Store go too far. The company argues that the mandate, which requires Apple to allow developers to link to outside purchases without paying fees, violates its rights and sets a troubling precedent.
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers originally ordered Apple in 2021 to permit in-app links to third-party purchase options. After a series of appeals and rulings, Apple implemented the changes in 2024 but added fees of 12 to 27 percent for purchases made through external links. Epic Games pushed back, calling the fees “unjustified,” and the court sided with Epic earlier this year.
Apple’s Arguments
Apple insists it complied with the original order and that the new injunction unfairly expands its requirements. The company contends that the rules strip it of compensation for its intellectual property and even force it to display messages it does not agree with.
Apple also referenced a recent Supreme Court ruling, Trump v. Casa, which stated that courts cannot issue universal injunctions broader than necessary. Apple argues that since Epic Games is the only plaintiff, the injunction should apply only to Epic, not all developers.
Impact on Developers
Currently, Apple must allow all U.S. developers to add links directing users to external purchases with no design restrictions and no fees. However, if the Ninth Circuit rules in Apple’s favor, the company could reintroduce fees or modify App Store rules again.
Epic and other developers argue that Apple’s practices restrict fair competition and prevent developers from offering cheaper alternatives to users. Apple, on the other hand, claims the changes amount to an unconstitutional taking of its property and punish it beyond what the law allows.
What Comes Next
The Ninth Circuit’s decision will have major implications not only for Apple and Epic but also for the broader app economy. A ruling in Apple’s favor could restore its ability to charge commissions, while a decision upholding the current order would mark a significant win for developers seeking more freedom on the App Store.
