India backed away from its order for smartphone makers to preinstall a government cybersecurity app earlier this month. However, new information shows that the country also explored a far more intrusive idea: mandatory satellite-based location tracking for all smartphones. Documents and industry sources outlined the proposal, raising concerns among privacy advocates and major tech companies.
The plan would have required manufacturers to enable enhanced A-GPS technology. This system combines satellite signals with cellular data to locate a device far more accurately than current tower-based methods. While the approach may help security agencies, critics argue that the cost to personal privacy would be severe.
Industry Pushback Intensifies
Apple, Google, and Samsung argued forcefully against the proposal. They warned that real-time and constant tracking would expose users to significant risk. A confidential letter from the India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) emphasized that A-GPS was never designed for surveillance. It added that forcing the feature into smartphones would be a “regulatory overreach” and a threat to ordinary citizens and sensitive professionals such as journalists, judges, and members of the military.
The proposal also included disabling the pop-up alert that informs users when a carrier attempts to access their location. The COAI, which represents telecom operators, pushed for its removal, but the ICEA insisted that the warning protects transparency and user control.
Public Pressure May Have Delayed Further Action
A meeting between government officials and smartphone industry leaders was scheduled for the same week the app-installation controversy erupted. That meeting was later postponed. Although no direct link was confirmed, sources suggest the intense backlash surrounding the app order may have encouraged the government to delay discussions about satellite tracking.
Still, privacy experts believe the proposal could resurface once public attention fades. India has shown continued interest in expanding digital surveillance, and this initiative fits within that broader pattern.
As the debate continues, companies and advocacy groups are urging the government to prioritize user safety and maintain clear limits on how location data can be collected and used.
