Skip to Content

New iMac Video card stealth upgrade: mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT?



I'm going to mark this one rumor for right now, but there's an interesting thread going on over at MacRumors Forums that suggests that the new iMacs may have a stealth upgrade. When they were announced a lot of folks were disappointed with the included Radeon HD 2600 Pro graphics card, however, some people have discovered that (at least running Windows in Boot Camp) their machines appear to be reporting that the GPU is actually an underclocked mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT, which is a more powerful chip. This would not be the first time that Windows has revealed hardware that Apple wanted hidden, as several machines were discovered to have draft 802.11n wireless networking chipsets in that way before they were later activated by Apple. Many are expressing hope that some future update or some ATI specific tool might unlock the hidden power of the GPU, but at this point it seems to be wishful thinking.

Thanks Marin!

Categories

Rumors iMac

I'm going to mark this one rumor for right now, but there's an interesting thread going on over at MacRumors Forums that suggests that the...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

14 Comments

Filter by:
DJ

Its funny but I went to the local apple store in Connecticut and they only had the 20 inch 2.4 GHZ imacs with 2MB of ram in it and not the boxed version(1mb) that a consumer would buy? Plus there were NO 2.0 GHZ 20 inch models on the floor. So it seems there is some trickery going on directed at the dumb consumer who does not know to look at the drop down "about this imac". I asked the store employee why there were no 2.0GHZ imacs on the floor, he said "nothing". Put the real deal on the floor and leave it up to the consumer to upgrade!!

September 04 2007 at 5:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TBi

"Apparently my 2.2Ghz MacbookPro w/ 128MB 8600GT, has 512MB, which I am positive is not true (it has 128MB, not 512)"

In windows your graphics card uses "TurboCache" which basically means it uses system memory as graphics memory. This is the same as how the GMA in a Macbook has 128MB memory when in reality it has none.

So too all extents and purposes you have a graphics card with 512MB of slower than normal graphics ram. OSX doesn't use this feature though. This would need a lot of driver development and probably some changes to how OSX handles graphics cards.

August 31 2007 at 10:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
RRK

Even Apples System Profiler states that the "Device ID: 0x9583". This ID refers to the mobility 2600 xt.

August 31 2007 at 9:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
AlexP

Um, I was under the impression that I was getting the same driver error that made my X800 XT a simple X800 back in 04 after buying my new PC. I really, really doubt it's an XT.

August 30 2007 at 4:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jason

#9 Adam

If you read the whole 21 pages of of the thread over at MacRumors (not likely, I know... I don't blame you), it seems to have been "confirmed" via several other methods other than Boot Camp.

But to be honest, I only skimmed the thread.

August 30 2007 at 12:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Adam

Don't trust what boot camp tells you

Apparently my 2.2Ghz MacbookPro w/ 128MB 8600GT, has 512MB, which I am positive is not true (it has 128MB, not 512)

August 30 2007 at 3:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mo

@6: Reducing heat is hardly “aesthetics”.

There are usually sound reasons for shipping underclocked chips: drivers might not be stable yet, or the thing runs too hot and causes problems for the system as a whole, or there are stability problems.

August 30 2007 at 3:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael K

I am on a G3 imac at the moment and waiting for leopard to come out to buy a new imac. Any thing would be an improvement over what I have now.

August 29 2007 at 10:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John

Not impressed, and not surprised.

They tried this same trick on the first Mac mini to reduce heat, and ended up flubbing DVI-D output for some people. Aesthetics over performance once again.

August 29 2007 at 10:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
danny bogue

uh i remember them telling us that it WAS the HD 2600 XT on the keynote....

August 29 2007 at 9:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.