Skip to Content

The EVDO Card Shootout



As I've often said right here at TUAW, I have a need for speed. I want my computers, my phones, and especially my Internet access to be as fast as possible. When I'm at home, secure in the knowledge that my Time Warner Business Cable connection is the fastest I can get (until FIOS comes to my hood), things are going well for me and looking good.

But what happens if I have to leave the house and go on the road as I frequently do? How can I possibly maintain my connection to the Internet while mobile and still get the speed I need? Fortunately, there a a few solutions to this problem such as using wireless "hotspots" around town or using a cell phone's data connection as a high speed modem for my Mac Book Pro.

However, for true freedom, a hotspot isn't the answer for me as you can't always find one when you need one or they cost too much money. As an iPhone user, the option to use my cell phone as a high speed modem was also out. So, that left one obvious choice for me: EVDO cards. Now that I had decided an EVDO card was the answer to my needs, several more questions immediately came to mind.

Which card should I get and from which provider? Would the cards work with my laptop of choice: the Apple Mac Book Pro? How much would the cards and data plans cost me? And the most important question of all: what kind of speed would I get?
Fortunately, living in a city like Los Angeles I have several choices of vendor to check out. So, in my quest for the perfect combination of speed and price for an EVDO card, I decided to try the three top vendors in town to see which would do the best job giving me what I really want: speed and a reasonable price. The three vendors I chose for this little experiment were Verizon, Sprint and AT&T. I tested the cards at various locations around the city to determine the speed of connection and reliability under different conditions.

My test machine for this was a 2.33 Ghz Intel Core Duo 2 Mac Book Pro with 3GB of RAM running Mac OS 10.5.1 and all current updates (my laptop of choice at the moment). I also decided that as the Mac Book Pro has a PCI Express Card slot and all three of the major EVDO card vendors in LA offer a PCI express card option, I would concentrate on those types of cards for this test. What happened? After all this thinking and planning, how did the cards stack up? Read on to find out.

Verizon

Setup - I selected the V740 card. This card could not have been easier to get going. I ordered online via Verizon's website and it shipped in about one day. The next day it was in my hands. So far, so good. Next, I inserted the card in my Mac Book Pro's PCI Express card slot, waited and watched as the computer recognized the card almost immediately.

Then, after about a minute, the card automatically went through its activation process and then was ready for use. Approximate configuration time from opening package and inserting card to being able to surf the Internet using this connection: under ten minutes.

Use - After the very pleasant activation experience I was hoping the card's performance would continue the trend. Fortunately, it did. I performed various speed tests at several points around the city. Downloaded files, browsed the Internet, checked email, etc. All those things that a mobile professional might do.

Of course, I also did a speed test and was very pleased with the results. I also visited YouTube and had no trouble streaming video on the site. I tested connection sharing with another Mac and was pleased to find out that you can indeed share this connection with another computer via Airport. Yet another perk of this card and service.



The data plan on Verizon is currently $60.00 / Month which gives you a fair amount of data throughput to work with. However, it is not "unlimited" and has a cap of 5GB/Month mostly, I suppose, to stop people from abusing it by running servers or other things that take a lot of bandwidth. I don't necessarily like to have a limit but in actual use, at least for me, the 5GB cap isn't an issue.

Sprint

Setup - I selected the Aircard 597E by Sierra Wireless. While Verizon's activation and setup process was relatively painless, Sprint's, on the other hand, was far more difficult and time consuming. I wasn't as sure about Sprint's PCI Express offerings so I ended up doing a bit of research on their cards to ensure compatibility with my Mac Book Pro and OSX.

After looking around a bit, i decided that the 597E would be the best choice. in fact, this card even specifically points out its compatibility with Mac OSX on the Sprint website and on its packaging so i thought that would make it just as easy to get going as the Verizon card. Sadly, I was wrong.

Where Verizon's card basically activated itself once i inserted it into my Mac Book Pro, the Sprint card had several steps that were necessary before I could get the connectivity I wanted. One thing before we get into the nuts and bolts of how I finally got the card to work: even though it specifically touts compatibility with OSX at Sprint's website and on the box of the card itself, the included CD does not contain the necessary software or drivers needed to get the card working with Mac OSX. Instead, you need to go to Sprint's website and download the required software. Yes, even though I realize its hard to be a Mac user sometimes and I shouldn't be surprised at this "oversight" it was still a bit disappointing. However, it wasn't terribly difficult to find the drivers and once I got them downloaded, the real fun was yet to begin because I still had to get the card activated.

Fortunately, as it used to be in the past, i didn't have to have a Windows system to activate the card. Being able to do it using the Mac OS is a good thing. I just wish it was a bit easier and had fewer steps. Was I spoiled by my experience with the Verizon card? Perhaps. Would it have made a difference if I had tried the Sprint card first? Maybe, but now it was too late.

Anyway, once the card was inserted and the downloaded software running, I went through a couple of the steps until I got to the point where the card needed an activation pin code. This meant I now had the pleasure of giving Sprint a call and wait on hold for over fifteen minutes to speak to a CSR who could activate my card. Once on the line he asked me a couple of question including the ESN number of the card and after a few minutes was finally able to give me the pin code.

Yes, that took some time but it gets even better. Next, he had to give me two other numbers, including what Sprint calls a MDN number, which I also had to enter into various fields in the Sprint Aircard software in order to proceed. Finally, after i entered those numbers, that part of the process was finished. Its at that point he informed me it could take up to four hours for the card to actually register on their system so I could use it. Nice.

After about an hour or so I decided to try my luck but sadly, it didn't work. At this point I won't keep you in suspense: it ended up taking almost five hours for the card to be activated. But finally, it was and I settled in to run some speed tests.

Use - Once up and running, the Sprint card performed pretty well during the speed tests around the city, scoring decent numbers close to what I got from the Verizon card. I also noticed network coverage was about the same as Verizon's as well and I didn't experience any loss of signal at the various points where I tried the card.

Currently, Sprint offers two different plans for these cards with the unlimited one being the same price per month as the Verizon offering. Even with price and performance being similar, the bad experience I had getting the card to work still made the Verizon card the winner for me so far.



AT&T

Setup - After a bit of searching, I was able to find the card I wanted at an AT&T store relatively near where I live. The card, AT&T's Option GT 3.6 Max Express, is AT&T's 3G PCI Express card and according to their website and the sales rep who sold it to me, should offer equivalent speeds to Sprint and Verizon in most parts of the city.

Sadly, while the AT&T rep at the store was pretty adamant about his company's offering in actual testing it performed very poorly. So poorly in fact, it was almost impossible to get a signal strong enough to test in some areas of LA. I guess AT&T implementation of 3G isn't particularly widespread here. Probably one of the reasons the iPhone isn't 3G yet. No point if the network doesn't support it, especially in a market as large as Los Angeles.

Use - On par with my in-store experience, in actual use the AT&T card itself was also not very good either. I tried it at the various locations around the city where I had taken the other two cards and no matter where I was, the results were pretty much the same -- very slow performance or no signal at all.

Even when I did manage to get a good signal, the speed of the card never approached anything like what I was getting from Sprint or Verizon. Consequently, at this point the card from AT&T would not be the one for me at all. Perhaps once AT&T's 3G network is much better in LA we can revisit it? Until then, the card is going back to the store where I got it.



Conclusion - Of the three cards tested, Verizon was the clear winner in most every way. Its ease of setup and use, speed of connection and reliability was far superior to the other two cards. Sprint was a good second choice and perhaps would have fared better in my testing if I had not had such a hard time getting the card working -- especially in comparison to the one from Verizon.

In the end, I returned the cards from AT&T and Sprint and kept the Verizon card. AT&T took the card back without problem and was able to cancel my service without charge. Sprint, on the other hand, again showed less-than-stellar customer service and is still trying to bill me a $150.00 cancellation fee weeks later, even though I returned the card after only a few days and was assured at the store where I purchased it that my account would be closed without charge. Thanks Sprint. I'll let you know how that one turns out.

Of course, as always, your mileage may vary but at least my experiences, both good and bad, can hopefully help point you in the right direction should you ever need to maximize your on the road internet access. If speed is your thing, like it is for me, a card like this can certainly help satisfy that need -- at least until you get home where the really fast connection is.

Categories

Portables Features Internet

var digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/The_Mac_EVDO_Card_Shootout'; As I've often said right here at TUAW, I have a need for speed. I...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

68 Comments

Filter by:
gar

Yes, Sprint's customer services sucks!! I also tested the verizon and sprint and found the verizon card better so i go and return the Sprint card. Ended up talking to about 3 different managers over there before they said they wont charge me the cancellation fee.

December 05 2007 at 7:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to gar's comment
Dave

I have had Verizon EVDO for about 2 years and I just got the newly released Kyocera KPC680 expresscard. I waited for it specifically because the pcmcia version by kyocera (the kpc650) was the fastest and most able to pull in weak signals. Now, of course I am wondering how my KPC680 stacks up against the V740. They are both Rev-A cards, but I wonder how they compare with download speeds and weak cell signals? Maybe in an update the review-writer can compare all available OSX expresscards on just the verizon network. My download speeds right now are average at about 600-1100kps and uploads of about 6-800kbps. Not too much better than they were with the KPC650. But it isnt recognized by OSX, you must install and use the VZACCESS software. No big deal, b/c it works well enough.

December 07 2007 at 4:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kent Covert

I believe something's up with your card, configuration, or location. I've got AT&T's service with a Sierra Wireless Aircard 875U. I routinely get over 1 Mbit download speeds with upload speeds around 300+ kbps and latency in the 100-200 ms range. I'm also in a relatively rural area (no cable or DSL available where I live). This is my primary means of accessing the Internet at home.

December 04 2007 at 9:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
chris ullrich

thanks for the comments all. i should not have generically lumped the three cards under EVDO, obviously, as i know full-well that AT&T's is based on HSPDA. still, that doesn't change the results that I got.

pretty much no matter where I went in LA, AT&T performed very poorly. maybe it was the card? maybe it was the network? or maybe it was just me? whatever it was, it wasn't good enough, at least for me, to end up as my card of choice.

thanks for reading.

December 04 2007 at 12:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Scott Likens

At the AT&T Speed, that would be EDGE Speed, not HSDPA, or UMTS... I would assume that they screwed up the activation of your card. I would suggest to get a new SIM and ensure you are getting 3G... it should blink Blue to show you are getting UMTS/HSDPA. Red would be EDGE/GPRS.

December 04 2007 at 12:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
thomas

I too have the Sprint Card, but mine is the 720 (Sprint's version of the Verizon card).

I get decent speeds everywhere I travel. In one case, I had quite the crappy phone connection for voice with Verizon but my Sprint card had a nice EVDO-Rev A connection. It was strange to have a nice data connection and crappy voice...

I did have to activate my Sprint card with windows, but it worked under Parallels so it wasn't an issue for me. It was also recognized as a USB port in Windows/Parallels, but worked just fine.

December 04 2007 at 12:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ed

I have used Sprint's ev-do for several months now and i think it is excellent. Didn't have any of the set up problems that you noted. It was super easy. But the speed of the network is pretty amazing. I'm very satisfied....

December 04 2007 at 12:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike Bentley

The GT Max card might have been configured to connect to the slower AT&T EDGE network rather than HSDPA, resulting with the low performance. I experienced similar performance recently during a trip to Maryland in an area that AT&T's coverage map up on their web site insists is bathed with 3G support. Leopard also supports the card directly, while Tiger requires you to install Option's Globetrotter application.

The title of the article should be something like "The 3G Card Shootout" since AT&T's wireless network supports GPRS EDGE and HSDPA.

December 03 2007 at 7:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike Chambers

One thing to keep in mind is that the Verizon card is US only, where as the AT&T card will work internationally (although it can be pretty expensive).

mike

December 03 2007 at 7:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Trey

Thanks for the article. Does anyone have information on similar cards that work internationally (with service plan)?

December 03 2007 at 6:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Trey's comment
digitalsedition

The AT&T card will work internationally, the Sprint one absolutely will not. But in the end it doesn't matter because the price of international data roaming is so significant that you would rather burn the data on a CD and mail it to somebody rather than use international data roaming. Its magically expensive.

December 04 2007 at 11:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Donald Burr

Your Sprint experience would have been much better if you had ordered through EVDOinfo.com. They pre-configure and pre-activate your card and ship it to you with all of the necessary Mac OS X software, drivers, etc. I ordered a Sierra AirCard 595U (the USB 2.0 version, since my MacBook lacks a ExpressCard slot) and it was literally a plug-and-play experience.

They ONLY sell cards that are Mac compatible, and offer excellent support, both pre- and post-sale. They also host a number of very helpful Forums where I have gotten help in the very few times that I needed it (mostly resulting from me screwing up and doing something I shouldn't have).

DISCLAIMER: I do not work for, nor derive any financial gain from, the folks at EVDOInfo.com or its partner sites. I am merely a very happy customer recommending a good product and service.

December 03 2007 at 5:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.