Skip to Content

Four flavors of iMac



The iMac has come such a long way from the days when it resembled a very chic lampshade. The best part about the refresh of the iMac line is the introduction of a 24-inch model for only $1,499, thus proving that the rumor mill is right once again, though the mutterings of an iMac refresh have been audible since prior to Macworld.

We're now down to one 20" model for $1199US, which features a 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 duo processor, 2GB memory (upgradeable to 8GB), 320GB hard drive, 8x double-layer SuperDrive and a NVIDIA GeForce 9400M video card with 256MB of shared DDR3 memory.

We now have three flavors of 24" iMacs to choose from now, ranging from $1499US up to $2199US. The $1499 model has the same 2.66GHz processor as the 20" while the $1799 bumps you up to 2.93GHz (3.06GHz optional) and the $2199 has 3.06GHz. All three 24" models come with 4GB memory with the option to upgrade to 8. The two lower-end 24" models come with 640GB hard drives (can be upgraded to 1TB), while the high-end comes with a 1TB drive.

The $1499 24" has the same video card as the 20", but the $1799 model has a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 256MB of GDDR3 memory video card and the $2199 model has a NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 with 512MB of GDDR3 memory video card. Both of these models can upgrade to a ATI Radeon HD 4850 with 512MB of GDDR3 memory for an additional $200.

All the models come with six USB ports, sorta: Four on the machine itself and two on the keyboard, then a single FireWire 800 port, built-in iSight camera and MiniDisplayPort. It also comes with a wired keyboard -- sans numeric keypad. If you want a wired keyboard with a numeric keypad, it's free but you'll have to indicate it when doing a BTO order on Apple's site.

Apple seems to be out to make 20" displays a thing of the past as the iMac narrows its line down to the one 20" machine, and the 20" Cinema Display has disappered completely. By introducing a third 24" iMac at the same price of the former high-end 20", Apple is making sure that these larger machines are becoming more affordable.



Categories

iMac Apple

The iMac has come such a long way from the days when it resembled a very chic lampshade. The best part about the refresh of the iMac line...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

27 Comments

Filter by:
John Wilen

Non-technical Dad here looking for advice. Yesterday's new Apple announcement has me more confused than ever. I am looking to buy a new (or recently discontinued) iMac. My decision of which model rests largely on the graphics capability as I expect this desktop will be my 10 year old son's gaming device for the next 5 years. I can't seem to find any information on how these Nvidia products compare, on Nvidia's website or Apple's. Other considerations don't really matter. There's enough memory, hard disk, processor speed, etc. for all my other needs.

I can still purchase an "old" iMac with either:

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO with 256MB memory
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS with 512MB memory

Or get a new one with either:

NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 256MB memory (new)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 with 512MB memory (new)

Obviously, the more expensive the Mac one buys, the higher the capability of the Nvidia component. But how does, for example, the "old" 8800 compare to the new GT 120/130?

Thanks in advance.....

March 04 2009 at 11:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sergraf

Beware: Apple took away the MiniDVI port and replaced it with their own Mini DisplayPort.
(The Mini Display-to-DVI cable runs $10 more than the MiniDVI-to-DVI cable.)
I'm confused – when it comes to hooking a Mac up to an HDTV, isn't MiniDVI more common than the MiniDisplay port?
They also removed the extra Firewire port.
Plus, they now make you pay $19 for the remote.
That's quite sad…

March 04 2009 at 8:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
james

no, the bluetooth keyboard has no usb ports on it. if you didnt plug a keyboard into the usb ports on the back of the computer, then you'd have 4 open ports, total. ignoring, of course, the mouse using a port in either example.

March 04 2009 at 2:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rory

I'm curious why no eSATA? External drives are all headed in that direction and yet not one of the upgrades released today includes eSATA.

March 04 2009 at 7:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
FJ

Its all great but why does the iMac with ATI Radeon 4850 take 4-6 weeks to be delivered?

March 04 2009 at 7:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
cheez

why not quad core? why not quad core? why? damn it! i was so sure that they will add a quad core model with imac this time..

pfff i cant afford a macpro apple and i need something better than dual core...

why not quad core model apple? why?


disappointed and complaining...

March 04 2009 at 4:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Stan

Disappointing. I was hoping for a Quad core, as I'm planning to have 2 cores devoted to OS X and 2 cores to Vista under VMWare and give each system 4 gigs of ram.

I'm going to buy this Gateway I saw at the local Microcenter that has a Core 2 Quad and 8 GB of RAM for $799. Put on a iAtkos/Kalaway build of the OS and I'm good to go.

March 04 2009 at 12:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tony

Boooooo! Oh well, I don't get my bonus until the end of March anyway. It'll give me time to mull it over, too.

March 03 2009 at 6:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tony

I've been waiting forever for Apple to make more affordable workstations like they used to, but they keep on making them more expensive. (More powerful, definitely, but also more expensive.) In addition, finding refurbished low-end models has become increasingly more difficult than it was in the past. However, I don't customize as much as I used to and a terabyte drive is enough to hold all the crap I keep on my computer... but I do love swapping in the latest big hard drives when they come along and internal ALWAYS outperforms external.

On the flipside, Apple's continuously lowering the prices of the iMacs. Not only do nearly all the frills come standard, but you can also upgrade the high-end iMac to a Radeon HD for only $50. (HELLO!!!) I've been waiting for Apple to stuff a quad-core in their high-end iMacs, but they wouldn't be as affordable as they are now and I bet it's a year off at the earliest. I hate the opaque box/non-swappable parts model of the iMac, but I do like 24 inch built-in monitors and I need to get an Intel Mac. I know I'll have hard drive and quad processor envy eventually, but the G5 PowerMac is quickly losing eBay resale value.

March 03 2009 at 3:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Tony's comment
Kyp

"you can also upgrade the high-end iMac to a Radeon HD for only $50." Yeah but, as I just found out, it won't ship until April 14th =(

March 03 2009 at 4:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Andy

Oh, heck. Down to one FireWire port now, are we? I'm happy it's FW800, but the previous versions had FW400 and FW800, albeit without the extra USB. This was perfect for our hot-desk studios; FW400 for the audio interface, FW800 for the drives. But this update means that we would now have to unplug the audio interface, attach a HDD, get a FW800 -> FW400 cable and daisy-chain the two. For every studio user who brings in a drive. And Pro Tools isn't a fan of USB drives... oh, no.

There's enough space on the back of those 24"-ers for a FW400 port as well. Probably even on the 20". Bad Apple. You're going to make life difficult for me when upgrade time comes around.

March 03 2009 at 2:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.