What the 27" iMac means for a designer
We asked our colleague over at Download Squad, Matt Heerema, for a designer's eye view on the new iMac 27" model.
Designers everywhere will rejoice at the announcement of the 27" iMac. With a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, you are just 160 pixels shy of a full, pricey 30" monitor (2560 x 1600). My current design setup (17" MBP, 24" Cinema display) nets me two 1920 x 1200 screens, though only one of them is really useful at a time.
My current Photoshop or Fireworks workspace occupies about 1500px of screen (with however much height is available at the moment). The 27" iMac means I would have a spare 1000px to have a browser with a full-width Web page open for reference, or possibly my coding environment (usually Textmate or Coda), for which 1000px would definitely be sufficient.
This side-by-side workspace would mean massively efficient flow. Combine that with the intense specs of the iMac (quad-core processor & boatloads of RAM, anyone?), and you have the ultimate designer machine. Also: The 27" will handle DisplayPort input as well as output, allowing it to double as an external display for yet another computer, in a pinch.
Now, where did I put my credit card?
Share
Source: http://apple.com/imac
Categories
We asked our colleague over at Download Squad, Matt Heerema, for a designer's eye view on the new iMac 27" model. Designers everywhere...
Add a Comment
What it means to designers is, that it is still double mirror and designer has to design the whole room to get rid of reflections of bright objects.
Any designer out there using ClearCal? Is it good?
Any reviews with metered picture quality with and without ClearCal?
I wish Apple would start offering Blu Ray. I've got an LG player hooked up to my Sony, and a PS3 and my HP desktop hooked up to my Pioneer Kuro. The only thing missing from the equation is the ability to take my discs on the road with me. I've got a macbook thats 2.5 years old and on its last legs (plastic is cracking off at the edges of the screen and my superdrive just died on me) and is in need of replacement. I know apple thinks the future of HD media is online distribution, but I personally think that's a crock of shit, and at the least Blu Ray should be the interim option until ISPs can meet the bandwidth requirements to stream HD at the same quality.
October 22 2009 at 7:26 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhere is the new high resolution mon for my MacPro?
Does Apple expect us to buy a new 27" iMac and use it as a second mon? Or buy the stone-age old 30" mon to help them clean up the not-selling inventory at skyprice?
I just want a new 27" high res mon now! Not an iMac....
Steve/apple, how long do we still have to wait for the new mon..... Please.....
Simon -
Your point is inapposite; would you argue a monitor with a resolution of 999999999 x 1 was superior to a 30" cinema display? The difference of 160 vertical pixels is negligible in terms of useful screen workspace. To put it in perspective, the 27" imac has 240 more vertical pixels than the previous 24" model.
What the 27" iMac means for a designer:
Compare the cost of any 2560x1440+ display plus any quad-core tower with the cost of the quad-core 27" iMac and you'll have your answer.
If someone finds it necessary to spend additional thousands of dollars for preferences like a matte screen (a preference I share), 160 vertical pixels, or "expandability", to each their own.
I'm no designer, but don't glossy screens actually render contrast and color better than matte screens? Also, is this a 24-bit screen or 16-bit?
October 21 2009 at 3:48 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIn ideal situation glossy screen truly renders contrast and color better than matte screens.
And exactly that on-screen (pre)view I just can't achieve in regular print or press, which is where it will go most often.
In less ideal situations I mostly see reflections of my self in a screen, which is also nice, but really not what I was going for.
Hm..
TUAW,
Can you please tell me if there is any way to get the top quad-core model to handle displaying the PS3? What type of cables? Thanks!!!
There will be an adapter sold by Apple.
October 21 2009 at 10:08 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI just downloaded a free app called Shades. For those of you who have problems with the glossy, check it out. It really does make a difference.
i don't know...I kinda like the glossy screen. I'm not a designer but I do quite a bit of digital art and animation stuff on my macbook pro which has the glossy screen. It makes everything look a lot more crisp and vivid. I guess it just comes down to preference but it does seem odd that matte wouldn't even be an option for those who prefer it. I should also note I tend to work in low lighting conditions and do most my work at night so I may just not have noticed the problems people are having with a glossy screen :/
October 20 2009 at 6:09 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyhopefully a less expensive monitor-only version is released, don't really want to switch to a Mac now
October 20 2009 at 5:23 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyOK so why no HDMI ports ?
Hot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Verizon Leather Sleeve for Tablets for $4 + free shipping
- Wicked Jaw Breaker Noise-Isolating In-Ear Headphones for $6 + free shipping
- Refurb Apple MacBook Air Laptops: 12" 64GB SSD for $699 + free shipping
- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



41 Comments