Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Apple jumps to 4th place in the latest Greenpeace survey

Tree-huggers who were feeling just a wee bit guilty about buying Apple products can rest easy today. Apple has jumped up to 4th place in the latest Greenpeace "Guide to Greener Electronics", up from 11th place just four short years ago.

Apple is behind green electronics leader HP, Dell, and Nokia on the list, but ahead of a stack of other electronics firms. Not surprisingly, since they don't seem to be able to do anything right at this point in time, BlackBerry maker RIM is in last place on the list (Jim Dalrymple, take note).

The higher score isn't making Greenpeace too happy with Apple, though -- they were given a severe spanking with the renewable green paddle for not setting a greenhouse gas emission reduction target or phasing out antimony and beryllium in manufacturing. Apple also got whacked for not excluding "suppliers that are involved in deforestation or illegal logging" when procuring paper for packaging.

On the other hand, the Greenpeace report handed Apple a laurel made of granola and hemp for its global recycling program, sourcing of conflict minerals, removing PVC vinyl plastic and brominated flame retardants from products, and meeting or exceeding Energy Star requirements.



Categories

Odds and ends Apple

Tree-huggers who were feeling just a wee bit guilty about buying Apple products can rest easy today
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

5 Comments

Filter by:
macserv

Is this now based on what companies are actually doing, or is is still based on what they've promised to do in the future?

November 10 2011 at 10:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kendall Tawes

The Greenpeace rankings don't make much sense. They put too much emphasis on easily breakable promises and completely ignores longterm longevity which means much more in terms of environmental friendliness. Granted people buying iPhones every year probably hurts that number.

November 10 2011 at 1:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mguniverse

How did HP snag #1? o.o

November 09 2011 at 11:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gene

Greenpeace's rankings have always confused me. I don't understand how Dell ranks above Apple with their crappy, disposable plastic computers that have to be replaced every 6 months; while Apple's aluminum and glass computers hang around for so long that there are constant complaints that new OS versions won't run on them. Meanwhile, HP also makes disposable products by pricing the printer so much less than the consumables and making them unrepairable.
Which is greener?

November 09 2011 at 4:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Gene's comment
mguniverse

True that, good sir.

November 09 2011 at 11:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.