In 2021, Dutch regulators found that Apple forced dating-app makers to use its in-App Store payment system. Consequently, Apple charged a 30 percent commission and barred links to third-party payment methods. The Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) deemed these terms unfair under Dutch anti-steering laws. As a result, ACM imposed a €50 million (about $58 million) fine on Apple’s local arm .
District Court Decision
On June 16, the Rotterdam District Court rejected Apple’s appeal. The court ruled that Apple did indeed abuse its dominant position by blocking alternative payment options. Moreover, the judges found that Apple’s changes in 2022—cutting its commission to 27 percent for dating apps—did not erase past violations. Therefore, the original fine remains in full force .
Apple’s Response and Appeal
Apple criticized the verdict, arguing that its policies protect user privacy and security. A company spokesperson told Reuters, “This ruling undermines the technology and tools we’ve created for developers and users, and we plan to appeal.” The tech giant now faces a higher-court review, likely in The Hague, where it will seek to overturn the fine on broader legal grounds .
Impact on Developers
Dating-app companies welcomed the decision, hoping for fairer fees and clearer payment rules. However, many noted that Apple’s new third-party payment option still carries a substantial commission and complicates refund handling. Therefore, developers must weigh the benefit of lower fees against increased customer support challenges.
Wider Antitrust Implications
This ruling adds to a global push against App Store exclusivity. The European Union has fined Apple over €1.8 billion for similar practices. Meanwhile, courts in South Korea and Japan have forced Apple to open its app ecosystem. Consequently, developers and regulators worldwide are watching closely to see if the Dutch verdict triggers further changes in Apple’s app-market policies.
Ultimately, the Rotterdam court’s decision underscores growing scrutiny of big-tech platforms and reaffirms the need for competitive digital markets.
