Create your own iTunes signature

The Digital Music Weblog is pointing to the iTunes Signature Maker this afternoon. It's kind of an odd thing that takes brief snippets of your favorite iTunes tracks (based on your ratings) and mashes them together into a single file. The result is your digital audio "signature." Dr. Jason Freeman is the author of the iTunes signature, and you can read an abstract of his project here.
I tried it out, and the result makes me feel like I'm full of hallucinatory drugs (you can see a list of some of the songs included above). It's kind of a neat idea, though, and I can see how trying to identify the represented songs could be fun. It also might be cool as a dynamic ring tone generator for the ROKR, based on whatever music you currently have on board.
[Via The Digital Music Weblog]
Share
Categories
The Digital Music Weblog is pointing to the iTunes Signature Maker this afternoon. It's kind of an odd thing that takes brief snippets of...
Add a Comment
I've been using a similar app called WishMix. A little different though because it's more of a music sharing and shopping tool.
December 13 2005 at 6:24 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyKai, Well..good thing I checked back here just by chance just to see what was said. O.K., so, I do know what a Certificate is compared to Authenticating. However, in this instance, when I clicked on the link an authentication dialog box popped up out of nowhere. I admit it was my fault for assuming that it must be the iTSM that wanted authentication. After trying the iTSM again, it worked fine, and as expected. It would have been much appreciated if you hadn't got up on your self-righteous high horse. You could have simply said "Hunh, weird, I didn't get any kind of Authentication dialog when I tried to run the iTSM, maybe something else is going on with your machine". I would have come back and retried the iTSM knowing that it must have been my error... but... Thanks. Oh and I also wanted to thank you for the elitist and juvenile "ron's" comment. Nice to know where you're coming from. It would be almost as bad if I was to deride you for the comically ironic words "educated descision" in your response. So, anyways, I thought I'd give you some substance for your unsubstantiated drivel.
December 07 2005 at 9:50 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI'm so into this. It sounds really beautiful to me. I just Bluetooth'd it to my phone and made it my ringtone. AWESOME SUGGESTION! TUAW forever!
December 07 2005 at 4:11 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply...or "ron's" if you don't like/misinterpret "mo's".
December 07 2005 at 2:26 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplySimilar...welcome to the definition of FUD. Good Lord. Lets see...why would I trust this app... Its digitally signed by a reputable CA (who's cert is included with the OS...) and the author's identity is known and proven. It runs in a sandbox. It doesn't need to authenticate; if you knew what your computer was *actually doing* then you'd be able to make an informed, and educated descision. The system is asking if it can read your keychain, to verify the certificate signer, and and the signed cert to your own...all the while abstracting the signed applet from this sensitive info...its no different than when safari, or ichat or anything else that uses Keychain services asks if it can do this. Ugh, I'm all for lookin' out, but the way crap gets started, and spread, is by a couple of mo's sphinctering out unsubstantiated drivel.
December 07 2005 at 2:15 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhen did it ask you for your password? Accepting a certificate != giving admin access to your machine.
December 06 2005 at 11:43 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI agree. I almost typed in my password, and then thought better of it. Not worth it at all.
December 06 2005 at 7:04 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWait, you're encouraging people to go to some random website and grant local security permissions to some unknown program? I'm not doubting that this is a legitimate site with a legitimate tool that does something cool. What I do doubt is that this is something we should be encouraging web users to do -- we know what kind of security nightmare the Windows platform has turned into, do we really need to encourage Mac users to accept as normal the idea of running untrusted code from a web site because it promises to entertain us for a few moments?
December 06 2005 at 6:25 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Altec Lansing Octiv Duo iDock for $48 + free shipping
- Used Apple iMac 17" Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz for $430 + $28 s&h
- Lounge Deluxe Stand for iPhone / iPod touch for $28 + $8 s&h
- Brookstone Surround-Sound Earbuds for $14 + $7 s&h
- Refurbished Skullcandy Tokidoki Smokin' Buds Mic'd Headset for $5 + $2 s&h
- Stitchway Backup Battery for iPod / iPhone for $5 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



8 Comments