It's official: iTunes tracks will remain $0.99 each

Um, from prior articles on this issue: nobody cares if a song becomes LESS THAN 99 (just don't hold your breath) - the issue is that popular songs were going to be more (often much more) than 99.

Will you pay $1.29 for a new track? $2.00? For one track? Not me.

I've never really understood the venom spewed on this topic. *gasp* I actually agree with record companies. Variable pricing is a very American and capitalistic idea. More demand = higher prices. I would complain, however, if higher prices for popular tracks were not offset by lower prices for older or less popular ones.

I believe that eventually you will have an online music store with variable pricing, and if that pricing undercuts iTunes significantly on older tracks, Apple could have a problem. The market generally works.

Gotta disagree with you, Dave. If the prices were variable, we--the consumer--would be setting the prices. The on-price-fits-all model won't last long, as it runs opposite the free-market system.

After know what many of the great musicians go through to make the great records they do, I am willing to pay the $.99. It isn't that high of a price.

My only problem with the iTMS is its horrible selection of music.

Dave, typically I like you. But I have to ask, if the price never went above $0.99 why would it bother you if a "less desirable" song cost less? Isn't that the very basis of a free market economy? Are you a communist?
=aron=

Hm - perhaps I should've RTFA, huh?

Does this mean the record companies re-signed their contracts with Apple, or that they're simply going to let their contracts expire?

....how you answer that question will DRASTICALLY change how I feel about this news. The former means while the price stays low, the content remains. The latter means it's possible for the price to be $0.99 and there to be no content to sell.

Still too much money, record companies save not having to pay for shipping, shelf space, printing, and disc mastering.

So why are we still paying 2004 prices on music? It's insanity!