Skip to Content

iTunes Music Store: resistance is futile

The Associated Press says the writing is on the wall: either your music is available on iTunes or you're irrelevant. The article points out that several artists that were resistant to having their music available online have given in (and flagging CD sales aren't helping).

However, there are still holdouts including Kid Rock and the Beatles. Why don't they want consumers to have more options? There are many reasons, though the article cites:
  • Piracy (which CD's really don't stop)
  • Not wanting people to only buy one track (you must respect the album and not get the one good song without all the crappy ones)
  • Small profits from online sales

Will we see the Beatles catalog available on the iTunes Music Store? Perhaps when I'm 64 (get it? Aww, come on that was funny).

The Associated Press says the writing is on the wall: either your music is available on iTunes or you're irrelevant. The article points out...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

26 Comments

Filter by:
Jason

I'm curious as to what people's thoughts are for how this would impact emerging or independent artists trying to get established. What's the financial impact of having your music listed on iTunes. What's the cost to an independent artist?

August 23 2006 at 11:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TJ Dizzle

That joke was tragic.

August 22 2006 at 3:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jon

"I think the Beatles are holding out because once they are making money off iTunes how are they ever going to sue Apple again?"

They'd probably make more money from suing Apple. I mean, they haven't made any new songs in decades (for obvious reasons) and a lot of people have their music already, so their sales will be limited.

August 22 2006 at 11:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Steve

Perhaps the Beatles plan to be the first big artist to sign with Microsoft's music service thereby giving it instant credibility as well as a reason to switch to ZuneTunes and the Zune.

August 22 2006 at 10:40 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Matteo D. Adreani

64 joke? i don't know if it was funny... sure it is that made me smile. ;-)

August 22 2006 at 7:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
fuddes

The Beatles I can understand people wanting. But Kid Rock? Anyone desperately wanting to buy his music must have spent the last eight years sealed in a vault.

August 22 2006 at 4:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joshua

I can really understand where they're coming from. If you're only going to listen to one song off of Bob Seger's "Night Moves", then you're missing the whole point of that album. Which is that he likes to work on his night moves, but he also likes that old time rock and roll. You totally couldn't get that message if you downloaded the songs on their own.

Come to think of it, that's exactly what the artists are afraid of. People like Kid Rock and Bob Seeger and Radiohead (bring it on, nerds, I said it) only have a couple of good songs worth listening to, this way, no one will have to buy the rest of the dross.

August 22 2006 at 2:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
robyn haywood

In time, their music will be available in itunes.

August 22 2006 at 2:22 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Speed42

Radiohead. That's what I want on ITMS. And Beatles, of course.

August 22 2006 at 12:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ronn

From what I've heard, The Beatles are nearly done with remastering their complete catalogue. A lot of the work was done for the special "Love" show set to Beatle's music by Circue du Soleil.

I think the Beatles will hold out till they see what their own endeavors produce. And if anything, McCartney is probably the most stubborn of the group when it comes to Apple Comp., not Yoko.

August 21 2006 at 10:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.