I like them, they resemble the periodic system a lot, very nice.

Reply

Ah, they are ok, but where the hell is Image Ready, or has it been rolled into Photoshop for CS3.

Reply

Boring.
I like the feather for Photoshop CS and don't like the Ps for Photoshop CS3.

Reply

I can't fathom how the world's most important vendor of creative software can't do better than application name initials. It's just embarrassing.

Reply

For a package called the creative suite, these aren't very creative. When I got the CS3 beta of Photoshop, the first thing I said to myself was "I hope that icon is just because it's beta." Needless to say, I am disappointed.

Reply

This gives new meaning to the name "Photoshop Elements"

Reply

I think they are lame. What are they going to do about language localizations? Also I think the "Print Shop" already has the PS icon.

Reply

Tomas,

My thoughts exactly. I was *sure* those were just placeholder icons. Ugh.

Reply

Nothing says "phoned in" like a couple of letters against a square color swatch.

Reply

http://www.artofadambetts.com/weblog/?p=169

I just switched my Icon.

I'm not letting Adobe give me a box with letters in it. no way.

Reply

I heard a rumor Adobe asked their accounting department to design the icons. I didn't believe it until I saw this...

Reply

I can't decide whether or not I like these. They look very clean, and it is an interesting approach to an extensive Icon Set, but when I add these to my dock, I know I am going to confuse similarly colored icon pairs as well as similar pairs of initials.

Reply

Terrible. I never expected them to be worse than the last batch, but there you have it. Adobe is leaking brains faster than GWB.

Reply

I like the direction the new icons are going in. To me it looks like an attempt to unify Adobe branding across the board and I wouldn't be surprised if, over time, these icons become more detailed.

At the moment I'm happy to see that less is still more in some circles.

Reply

I personally greatly prefer Iiro Jäppinen's CS3 feathers. I can only hope he and other artists make complete replacement sets.

http://www.macthemesforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=16778591

Reply

It's interesting, but I wouldn't want to be the poor bastard with Fh, Rh, Fw, and Pm all next to each other in the Dock.

Reply

These are an improvement in identifying which application you are selecting. The old icons were dreadful. I do admit they are a bit dull though. Professional application icons don't need to be exciting though, look at Aperture compared to iPhoto.

Reply

Something to represent the individuality of each component while still maintaining a cohesive theme would be great. As it is, these seem like placeholders or a bad concept by amateur typographers.

I truly hope this is a poor prediction and not the way Adobe is going. I think Iiro Jäppinen is moving the right direction, depending on the look of 10.5. Simple, streamlined, elegant. Perhaps less saturation and gloss, but still individually recognizable standard shapes, like the feather.

Reply

I love it. It's simple, direct and minimalist. They look like all the swatches in a swatch palette when they are all in a row. I don't know about you, but I don't look for inspiration from my apps, they are tools, like a hammer or a brush. As tools, they rest in my toolbox (dock) they need to be easily identifiable for when I need to work and since I never leave my dock showing, I hardly see them.

The two things I do notice is:
1. Is that Page Maker in the furthest most Yellow area? If so, why? I thought it was dead.
2. Notice how Dreamweaver and GoLive are on opposite sides of the "spectrum"? I wonder if that is a tell about how they view the two products?

Reply

I wasn't sure at first, but the more I use the Ps and Fw betas, the more I like it. I also think it does a good job of unifying the branding with the Macromedia family.

There are some very nice alternatives over at macthemeforums.net though, if anyone is looking around.

Reply