How does he know customers don't want it? Did I miss the trial run?

Reply

I agree. I don't want a monthly fee to listen to music.

Reply

Why would I want all my music to stop working when I stop paying a subscription? I've used Napster and it's crap unless you pay more money to copy to MP3 players. I'd rather pay per album or song and have the ability to keep it forever even if I stop using iTunes Store.

CD stores don't charge you a monthly fee and make you return CDs.

Reply

Um, CD stores don't let you cart out the whole store with you. Both models have pro's and con's, it mainly depends on your listening habits.

I'd love to see a subscription service being offered, it only gives us more choice. The one thing I hate about all existing services though is how many albums have certains songs that are purchase-only. So you pay your monthly subscription fee, yet you still don't have access to all the songs. That limitation definitely makes it not worth it.

On the whole though, I stick to buying physical CD's.

Reply

I like that Steve's quote:

"The subscription model of buying music is bankrupt. I think you could make available the Second Coming in a subscription model and it might not be successful."

(http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs)

Reply

Also, with subscription models, you can't burn to CDs because the CD will keep working forever and not just shut off when you stop paying monthly. For those of us that only have CD players in their cars (no Aux input) this is a deal-breaker.

Reply

although there's nothing to say he wouldn't do a subscription model for the videos. People don't mind renting movies/tv shows.

Reply

If the iTunes Store went completely DRM-free and had an eMusic-style subscription (30-40 tracks/month at $10/month or so), then I would be on board with that.

But I agree that the idea of collecting a bunch of music that you can't permanently keep is kinda pointless to me. Music is something that I will continue to want to experience years down the road. If I have to continue paying tribute to a retailer for that usage, that's just ridiculous.

I do, however like the idea of having the ability to preview whole tracks and albums before buying. So here's a feasible music test drive option that I would propose: set up a system where all iTunes Store account holders have the option of listening to a set number of tracks for free every month (say, 10-15). Users flag a track for "preview" and get the privilege of streaming it over iTunes (not transferrable to iPod or burnable to CD) for 30 days or so. After that time, this "preview" access to the track goes away and you can't flag the track again for a few months or so. This seems like a system that would appease the labels but allow customers some extra flexibility to preview tracks for purchase.

Reply

Apple doesn't want people to rent unlimited songs online for a flat monthly fee is because the profit margin for this kind of business model is very low.

Reply

I tried the Napster service (even tho I have an iPod) just for a couple of months. It was awesome downloading as much music as I wanted for the same price. And then I decided to cancel and suddenly the gigs of files on my computer were useless. Its kind of scary to think I could invest my money in something that could be turned off at any second leaving me with nothing to show for myself. I'll pass on a subscription model!

Reply

I don't want to consume music.

I want to pay one time and keep it years and years

you have to understand, I still listen pink floyd and Queen from so many years I forgot

but also Gorillaz or Air. and surely again in 20 years.

I don't want to rent. and pay and one day loose them.

I want ti pay one time for one music. THE music.

Reply

I think that a subscription service would benefit everyone. It's like renting video games but on a smaller scale; if you rent something you hate, you can always get rid of it. If you buy it, then you're stuck with it until your little brother takes it from you or you trade it to someone else for something better.
With music, it just opens up the possibility of finding new stuff that you didn't know you wanted. If you really like it, then you can always buy it. iTunes could even work like Netflix does and suggest tracks for you to rent based on similar interest. It's a no lose situation. For those that don't want subscription, fine, just buy your tunes. As an Apple shareholder but someone who can't find anything good on iTunes (where's the drum and bass? cmoooooon), I'd like to see this happen.

Reply

Online music subscriptions from Apple? No thanks. Online movie subscriptions from Apple? Yes please.

Reply

I agree with rental movie program on iTunes. Music I want to own. I listen to it over and over and over. Movies I would rent. Let me watch it once and that's it--just like the video store.

Reply

Buy music. Rent movies/tv shows. That's what I would love to see. Maybe they should make both options available. A pure music subscription model is a bad idea. I don't buy the same amount of music every month, yet with a subscription, I would have to pay the same fee. No thanks!

Reply

Rent music, no way. I like to own my music.

Rent movies and games? hell yeah, I enjoy Netflix and Gamefly more than anything I can ever remember subscribing to.

But movies and games are not like music. I'll listen to the same song over and over and over, but with movies I generally watch once and then maybe revisit it again down the road. As far as games I'll buy the ones that provide endless fun, but for games like Super Paper Mario where once you beat it there isn't much reason to play again..rental is great.

Reply

If they ever do offer a subscription based plan I hope they model it after something like the music clubs such as BMG, Columbia House, etc.

I envision you can play anything from the online library with your monthly subscription with the caveat that you couldn't burn the files to disc. But along with that you'd also be able to 'buy' a certain number of songs/albums per month based on the monthly rate you've chosen. Say for $12.95 a month you get all the music you want to listen to as well as 1 album or 12 songs purchased for continued use if you stopped your subscription. There would be a tiered pricing structure of something like:

$12.95/month/12 songs yours to keep
$19.95/month/24 songs...
$24.95/month/30 song...

I think I'd go for that especially if, like a cellular plan, you could carry over monthly songs like roll-over minutes.

Anyway. It'll never happen, I guess.

Reply

I don't see where anyone has suggested that subsription would REPLACE purchasing. If you don't want subscription, just don't use it. Why campaign against it? It's not a threat to purchasing. Can't they exist side-by-side? Or is subscription so heinous that it must be eradicated?

Reply

Remember, Rhapsody is available for the Mac, just through the web-client.

Reply

I Don't want to rent my music hell no!! It's that old saying if it ain't broke don't fix it!

Reply