Filed under: Software, Productivity, Internet Tools, Beta Beat
Journler beta gets proper tagging abilities

In case you missed TUAW Podcast #24, I've gone gaga for Philip Dow's Journler. It's a phenomenal donationware app that offers robust features for keeping a diary, storing files you need to keep track of, recording audio/video entries and even blogging. One of Journler's cruxes, however, is that its UI for tagging entries wasn't quite up to par; tags were separated with spaces or commas (your choice), but aside from searching, there was no decent way to really grab hold of and utilize your tags.
Fortunately, a beta posted by Dow in the Journler forums offers a glimpse at how the app's tagging paradigm is changing for the better - much better. As you can see, tags are now 'officially' recognized by Journler, and pressing return invokes a satisfying blue bubble around them, securing their entry in Journler's database. As you work with these new tags, Journler will also begin to auto-complete them, saving you more and more time as you continue down the path to Journler goodness.
[Update: I didn't even realize this, but Dow built in an even cooler, killer feature with these tags - you can click on then in an entry or in the entry browser and view a list of other entries using that same tag. I'm in love.]
If you decide to check out this new version though, be sure to read through the entire forum post. Dow had to make some changes to the way Journler stores and creates your tags, so he had to create an AppleScript you only have to run once to help get the new version up to par and convert over all your old tags for the new system. Naturally, you should back up your Journler folder in Application Support before trying any of this, but I happily performed the upgrade with nary a bump on the trip.
Don't forget: Journler is donationware, and Philip Dow sure would appreciate a few bucks for his excellent work.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ortatherox said 5:19PM on 7-23-2007
PhilipDowRocks!
Reply
Matt said 5:48PM on 7-23-2007
It's not donationware. It is free for personal use, and requires a license for use in any organisation.
Reply
yakov chodosh said 7:10PM on 7-23-2007
Journler owns.
Reply
derek said 9:08PM on 7-23-2007
"female orgasm".
Way to go.
Reply
elisa said 4:13AM on 7-24-2007
I LOVE Journler and I'm proud to have actually donated some money for it. It's definitely my favorite mac app and a real joy to use.
This new tagging feature seems really cool. I've found the old tagging a bit annoying to use so I haven't used tags, but now, I just might :D
Rock on, Philip Dow!
Reply
jane45223 said 11:30AM on 7-24-2007
YES, YES, YES ... Please do the right thing and DONATE. This is application is the best and it keeps on getting better. I donated and I am thinking of donating again.
Reply
dre said 1:22AM on 7-25-2007
@Matt: it IS donationware AND free for personal use, though a license is requested (10$ minimum)
Reply
marcosmalo said 12:27AM on 7-26-2007
This has joined Safari and Mail as my always open programs. Totally worth kicking down $10. I wish I wasn't so broke or I'd have sent more. But it's such a great little app that allows me to do so much without being bloated (the app, not me), that I felt morally obligated to pay something.
So, how stable is the beta? Anyone trying it? I'm really reliant on Journler now that I'm afraid to try the beta.
Reply
David Chartier said 1:52PM on 7-30-2007
#8: I've been using the Journler betas pretty heavily since I write most of my TUAW and DLS posts in them. I tag posts, link words, and use smart folders, primarily. It's been pretty solid.
However, I haven't been using the audio/video features much, so I couldn't speak on that end.
Reply
Claude said 4:58PM on 8-01-2007
I discovered and tried journlr thanks to you and cannot live without it. It has so many features that I haven't had time to discover them all, but I love it and donated. :)
Thanks for the podcast, which was great help too.
Reply
David Chartier said 8:36PM on 8-09-2007
#10: Claude, you're most welcome! Always glad to be of service.
Reply