Filed under: Apple Corporate, iPhone
Apple sued over iPhone keyboard
People like to sue each other (Americans at least), and they love to sue Apple.Supposedly, the iPhone's keyboard infringes upon a patent awarded to Florida's SP Technologies LLC in 2004. They're seeking compensation for iPhones sold, as well as an injunction against the continued "...willful and deliberate" use of their intellectual property.
We'll see where this goes. In the meantime, we'll say it again: People love to sue Apple.
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
dlmtechnology said 1:22PM on 8-06-2007
Where was this company when Apple first showed off the iPhone back in January to complain of the patent infringement. This bottom feeder just sees the number of phones sold and thinks hey, lets get a piece of the pie!
Reply
Karl Childers said 2:08PM on 8-06-2007
And Apple never sues anyone eh?
Reply
required said 2:24PM on 8-06-2007
I might be wrong but I believe Apple often sues people.
Reply
artifex said 2:29PM on 8-06-2007
Virtual keyboards have been around for years. My ReplayTV has one. What's the patent, and won't it get tossed in a challenge due to prior art?
Reply
Martin said 2:35PM on 8-06-2007
I would think the suit is over the "make the letter appear above the finger when pressing the button" aspect of the keyboard.
And yes, Apple seems to give as often as they get.
Reply
Tony C said 2:42PM on 8-06-2007
The comment about virtual keyboards being around for years is right, but I wonder if anyone has filed a patent for it. Someone will likely state prior art, but it has to beat their specific caveat of the user not being able to resize or close it until the data field is entered. PalmOS comes to my mind as prior art and I'm sure there's a lot older stuff out there.
For details on the patent go to USPTO.gov and search on patent number 6,784,873 if the following link doesn't work.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=6,784,873.PN.&OS=PN/6,784,873&RS=PN/6,784,873
Reply
Tony C said 2:47PM on 8-06-2007
The comment about virtual keyboards being around for years is right, but I wonder if anyone has filed a patent for it. Otherwise, there's a ton of companies that will be sued for this feature. Someone will likely state prior art, but it has to beat their specific caveat of the user not being able to resize or close it until the data field is entered. PalmOS comes to my mind as prior art and I'm sure there's a lot older stuff out there.
SP Technologies must be one of those IP holding companies because the original patent was awarded to a pair of inventors from Iowa and Nebraska.
For details on the patent go to USPTO.gov and search on patent number 6,784,873 if the following link doesn't work.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=6,784,873.PN.&OS=PN/6,784,873&RS=PN/6,784,873
Reply
Bob said 4:40PM on 8-06-2007
Of interest is that the person who brought the suit is a convicted felon currently appealing case in which he was slammed on fraud. See here:
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/14490/
Reply
Chris said 8:28PM on 8-06-2007
What's next? A lawsuit over the clickwheel because someone filed a patent for a "navagational device for an MP3 Player?"
Reply
Reg Muffet said 9:37PM on 8-06-2007
Prior art, eh?
Well, let's see. The Newton came out 1993.
Soft keyboard was included (it was John Sculley's preferred entry method, and a lot of other people's once they realized Newtown Handwriting Recognition version 1.0 kept inputting Eat Up Martha. Version 2.0 aka "Rosetta" was really good, but the product was dead by then).
Case closed. Next case: someone suing Apple for using the color black.
Reply
zerock said 10:12PM on 8-06-2007
they just want to make some money too :P
Reply
Someonenotfromstates said 2:42AM on 8-07-2007
Looks like the patenting system has become a way sue people for being innovative. So let's all make phony patents and see if someone made a product out of it so we could sue it for a pile of money
Reply
Ian said 12:43PM on 8-11-2007
The substantive aspect of the patent is that it provides a virtual keyboard to the user with LESS functionality than other virtual keyboards that are described in prior art. It can't be moved, resized or hidden.
When patents are granted for existing technologies MINUS a feature or features then the fault lies with the examiner and the process.
I hope he is responsible for the costs of defending the case for both parties.
Reply
Swanny said 9:58AM on 8-28-2007
See for yourself if the keyboard sucks http://hotcellfish.com/freeiphone.html
Reply