Filed under: OS, Switchers, iMac
Uncle Walt says the new iMac rocks Vista
Ever since Boot Camp was released it has been no surprise to find out that the Intel Macs also make for some of the best Windows machines too (well, if you can bring yourself to install it, that is). Anyway, Walt Mossberg, dean of tech writers, has gotten one of the new iMacs and for kicks installed Vista via Boot Camp. And sure enough, Uncle Walt says he tested it "using Vista's built-in Windows Experience Index, a rating system that goes from 1 to 5.9, with scores above 3.0 generally required for full, quick performance. My iMac scored a 5.0, the best score of any consumer Vista machine I have tested." This was apparently the 2.8GHz machine as he says it was the top-of-the-line model. I know some folks were disappointed with the new iMacs slightly anemic graphics cards, but it's good to know they can still rock Vista if called upon to do so.[via MacVolPlace]
![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Neil Christie said 7:12PM on 8-25-2007
The graphics cards are awful. How many of these other "consumer" systems he is considering cost as much as the iMac and what GPU do they have in them?
I'm not sure what came over Apple - they've already got a great setup in the MacBook Pro, why not just drop an 8600 into the iMac and let people enjoy games instead of a stuttering mess?
Reply
Sidep said 7:17PM on 8-25-2007
i read an article today about the removal of matte screens from the imac, i assume the graphics cards installed in them works to the same effect. it is to deter pro users from buying the machine--forcing their hand and wallets to buy a mac pro.
Reply
scott said 7:43PM on 8-25-2007
No DX10 though, correct?
Reply
E-Rock said 8:11PM on 8-25-2007
0 to 5.9?
What the hell kind of scale is that? ...only Microsoft...
Reply
an arthistorican said 8:43PM on 8-25-2007
Yeah, I don't get that either. Must be a scale from "ye olde days", or an foreign and distant land, like transilvania.
Reply
Rod said 9:14PM on 8-25-2007
Does anyone take Walt seriously anymore? He might has well change his web address to apple.com/walt :-)
Reply
blinkcowz182 said 9:40PM on 8-25-2007
Not sticking up for Microsoft at all but they made the scale like that so that they can push the top number higher as better computers come out. Example: Your computer will always be a 5 so long as the hardware stays the same and Micrsoft will increase the scale to keep your score the same and increase with new systems. Still silly, yes.
Reply
Dave said 9:59PM on 8-25-2007
Hmm, my 2.16GHz 17" iMac C2D pulls a 4.7 in the Vista experience score.... the 2.8 and new chances only gives it a .3 edge?
Reply
JonOQ said 10:15PM on 8-25-2007
Too bad about the glossy screens though! :-(
Reply
JohnQ said 10:19PM on 8-25-2007
would it be worth it to just throw in my 7600GT?
who makes the boards on the 2600s they throw in Macs?
Reply
Jeffrey Bergier said 1:22AM on 8-26-2007
The vista rating is not to show you how much you have upgraded. 5 is the best computer that was available at the time Vista came out. So if everything in your system is higher than 5 than it is better than anything available when vista was released. The thing holding back the new imacs is the video card at only 5.2 for gaming performance...
I have vista on my new iMac. I am installing BioShock right now. We will see how it plays. It will be tough for her. But Half Life 2 and C&C 3 play really well with graphics all the way up at 1280x760 resolution. It is much better than my Gaming PC I had before this. (granted it was an athlon xp 2100+. The funny thing about that is it ran vista like a champ, but OSX requires CPU features that chip doesn't have and will not run as a hackintosh... and they say vista has steep requirements :-)
Reply
Adam said 7:04PM on 8-27-2007
Im not trying to troll but this is why i build my own machines. im not spending upwards of 2+ grand for a pretty pre built machine that only scored a 5 on the 5.9 scale. My 6 month old desktop cost 900 and its scoring a 5.4 right now...
I just wish macs werent so damn expensive, then i would be rocking an iMac with vista and os x
Reply
chris said 8:50PM on 8-27-2007
Hey scott - all of the new iMacs and the newest MacBook Pros are definitely DX10 compatible (in Windows, of course) and use a "unified shader architecture". It sounds like this is a pretty major change from the way previous graphics cards worked, so it may take a while for the drivers to be fully optimized.
These ATI cards may not be ideal for hard-core gaming but are definitely not awful, are a lot better than the X1600 in most of the previous iMacs and seem to offer great OpenGL performance:
http://www.barefeats.com/imacal2.html , which should be good for Core Image, Core Animation, etc...
Reply
Timothy Stull said 9:23PM on 9-13-2007
I have the 2.8 GHz 24" and get 5.0 with Vista but it is because of the memory. The system runs at 800 MHz and they put in 667MHz memory. With an upgrade the score will go up. I installed Vista to game with C&C3 and Supreme Commander and it runs very fast. Now I find myself running Vista most of the time. I still love my sexy mac though worth every penny.
Reply