Surely a US based poll, as Europeans prefer unlocked phones period. That way when we travel between other countries we can swap sim cards for the lowest possible tariff.

Reply

I wouldn't personally want an unlocked iPhone, even if it meant i could get it now in the UK. How much of the iPhone is data based... you really need unlimited data. You just don't get that in the UK for any reasonable price!
So please Apple; get us a good data deal!!
I think many people in Europe wouldn't yet want an unlocked iPhone due to the fact that the iPhone does _need_ lots of data/net access. Just not worth it without it!

Reply

I have a problem paying $100 for a hack that can simply be turned off. You pay $100. Apple shuts them down and kills the hack. You loose $100 and you are stuck with an iPhone you can't use.

If I was going to Europe I would rather buy a pay as you go SIM card for local calls. Hence, I would desire an unlocked phone.

Reply

Unlocking in the US doesn't really make much sense, as there are only two GSM carriers to choose from: AT&T and T-Mobile. (Yes, some local areas have small GSM operators, but they are definitely in the minority.) I personally am interested in an iPhone unlock because I am a T-Mobile consumer who wants an iPhone but doesn't want to switch to AT&T. We're contract-bound for another year or so. Normally I would just bite the bullet and pay the early termination fee (I think they pro-rate, so mine would be less than the full amount), but I am the owner of a family plan and I don't want to leave my other plan mates stuck. (AT&T signal turns out to be OK for me where I go, so switching carriers wouldn't matter much for me.)

The majority of the unlocking interest is coming from Europe because they have a wide variety of GSM carriers, and also because the iPhone is not yet available across the pond.

Of course, now that the iPod Touch is out, this is probably less of a need for people now. If all you were after was the cool touchscreen and web browsing stuff, and you already have a cell phone/plan you are satisfied with, and are willing to carry 2 separate devices, then the iPod Touch is right up your alley. (However, given the same situation, I would still buy an iPhone and unlock it, rather than buy an iPod touch; the phone I have right now under T-Mobile sucks mightily.)

Reply

$99? You must be joking. Turning a profit is one thing, but one can get a Nokia unlocked for FREE.

I'm all for unlocked phones from day one, as my last two phones have been. But many iPhone features need support on the back end, and no one has that (yet) except AT&T.

I'm a T-Mobile fan. I'll wait. My N90 is good enough for now.

Reply

Sure, US people don't care much about an unlock, since they can use their phones. But us Canadians need to unlock it in order to use the phone.

And when (in 2013) Rogers makes a deal with Apple, I'll still use the phone with Rogers.

Reply

It would be a safe assumption for me to say that Europeans, particularly those of us who dwell in the United Kingdom, have their phones "unlocked" from service providers purely because they ruin perfectly decent handsets with their over-clogged rubbish embedded within the handset's operating system.

Being a resident of the UK and seeing how Apple would not dare allow any service provider tamper with the iPhone's operating system to include some absurd "Vodafone Live" button or "T-Zone" button or "Planet 3" button is a dream come true. Apple are in control of the handset and the carrier is lucky enough to have the iPhone under its belt of handsets purely due to the amount of Europeans who want their hands on the iPhone.

I am all for the iPhone and cannot wait for it. I am sure anyone with an ounce of information on the iPhone knows that unlocking their iPhone to work under another service provider is like chopping it in half and having half of the phones features. Apple have made the perfect bridge between handset provider and service provider and I am very much certain they will do the same for Europe.

Reply

@SteveDixon

You're confusing 'unlocking' with 'debranding'.

'Unlocking' means you can use another networks SIM card in the phone.

'Debranding' is the process that removes all the network providers customised crap and re-instates the manufacturers generic non-branded firmware.

They're separate processes, and one can be done without the other.

Reply

I live in an area that T-mobile doesn't service, and since the government definition of "competition" is pretty much a joke, that leaves AT&T as the only GSM player in my area. Not much sense in paying $100 to unlock a phone when I have no choice of another GSM vendor.

Reply

Also, forgot to say that the ONLY iPhone feature that doesn't work if unlocked and used on another network is Visual Voicemail. Hardly 'half the phones features'.

Reply

where's the "I own an iPhone but don't have a good reason to buy the unlock cause I recently sold my soul to AT&T for 2 years" button?

Reply

I'm satisfied with AT&T on my iPhone, but I want the ability to use another SIM when I'm traveling out of the US. Hence, I've been following this saga closely.

Reply

The author of this post should expand their mind a bit past the borders of the USA - of course there is excitement about a software unlock. There are three (four) alternatives at the moment: hardware hacking which is very scary, turbosim which can cost as much as the iphone itself due to shortages, sim cloning, which only works with a small percentage of SIMs and requires a degree of technical nouse, (and a new turbosim-alike which is US$140). Instead, for $50 you can get a program that does it for you in a nice easy way. And while one may want to support apple/at&t, that's not an option for hmm, the rest of the world.

If you think there's not much interest in, then go to this thread and count the number of pages of posts created in the last 24 hours (it exceeds 30 pages):

http://hackint0sh.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4492

Reply

I can't believe this. How can anyone be against something like this?
I think AT&T deserves to have the iPhone unlocked. I also think Apple does for continuing this trend of carrier lock. Don't get me wrong, I love the iPhone and I love Apple, but I fully support the unlocking and hacking that people have been doing. I was thrilled when people wrote apps for the iPhone. It really shows that we, the consumers, are not going to put up with the crud that cell phone companies (and Apple, unfortunately [I never thought I'd say that!]) dish out these days.

Reply

The only reason I'm not interested in the iPhoneSIMFree is that it's about $50 more expensive than I'm willing to even consider. Once it hits that point though, I'll be much more interested in dropping my GoPhone plan for something more economical...

Reply

I think it just comes down to choice. Consumers should always have the option to use any hardware with any other provider, to forbid this, I think is monopolizing.

Unfortunately, the mobile phone market is not historically set up to allow this so Apple had to cave in. I'm sure in their R&D phases, Apple wanted to do what was best for the consumers, that is to have a completely unlocked GSM, CDMA, WCDMA, etc. phone line, but the current state of the mobile phone market forced them to make a decision.

I would hope that in subsequent updates Apple does not counter this unlock hack, because in the end, isn't it better for the consumer to have choices?

Reply

Well, depending on where you are, it could be a big yawn, or the most exciting thing since January.

There are over 400 GSM carriers around the planet. Up until recently, the iPhone has been locked to just one of them.

If you were lucky enough to be located in the the US and could afford the contract, then yawn away. If you were outside the US or needed more plan flexibility, you've now being given the possibility of using the best phone ever made.

Beer or champagne, it's still a celebration!

Reply

$100 bucks?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?


Normally i pay $10-$20 to get my phones unlocked. No way in hell am i paying $100 just to get ONE phone unlocked.


Sooner or later, the iPhone will be available to Tmobile, or AT&T will unlock the phone themselves, $100 is just too much.

Reply

I'm in the "meh" crowd. I'm also not having any issues with AT&T coverage and actually find AT&T's coverage similar if not superior to the Verizon coverage in the areas I frequent. DC Metro/Northern Virginia, north to Central New Jersey and a few travel ventures to Cleveland, OH and western PA. I don't need an unlock for my iPhone but I can appreciate the folks that want the iPhone now where none is available.

Reply

How about the poll choice "I like the idea of it being unlocked, but how long before AT&T makes Apple patch it?".

Reply