Skip to Content

Apple: "we plan to have an iPhone SDK in developers' hands in February"

That's right folks. You read it correctly. Cats & dogs are living together, and in other news Steve Jobs has, via Apple's 'Hot News' page, announced that Apple will, FINALLY, support third-party development of native applications for the iPhone.

The SDK will arrive, for iPhone and iPod touch (!), in February 2008 after MacWorld San Francisco. Apple "[is] excited about creating a vibrant third party developer community around the iPhone and enabling hundreds of new applications for our users," but they are taking the time to do it properly "because we're trying to do two diametrically opposed things at once -- provide an advanced and open platform to developers while at the same time protect iPhone users from viruses, malware, privacy attacks, etc."

I think I can speak for everyone here at TUAW, and of course our loyal readers, when I say that this move is so incredibly welcome and WOW. All I can say to Steve is: "What took you so long to let us at your beloved devices?" Now the only question is whether the various iPhone dev teams can sit on their collective coding hands until Valentine's Day...

Thanks to all those who sent this in!

That's right folks. You read it correctly. Cats & dogs are living together, and in other news Steve Jobs has, via Apple's 'Hot News'...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

75 Comments

Filter by:
Dominic M.

I have a question. This is SDK is compatible with the current IPod Touch right? What I mean is, if I buy an IPod Touch, let's say, tomorrow, the applications made with the SDK will be available to me, right? I know SDKs are made to develop third-party apps and mods, and I am familiar with them, but I just want to make sure, because you never know what Apple's next move it going to be. I don't wanna buy a Touch and find out it's not compatible with apps. The only app I am interested in at this moment is a mail app similiar to the IPhone's. But, I don't feel like jailbreaking it and voiding the warranty or having the chance of bricking it.

January 11 2008 at 3:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thomas

I'm ready for iPod Touch apps now. :)

December 25 2007 at 6:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
horrace cooper

i didn't know that the ipod didn't have the aplications to do the other known whereabouts of the actuall different 3 party types. if i known now what i known then, i wouldn't of typed any souce codes or URLS. But hindsight is always easy before or after the event isn't it?

Anyway, would updating the ipod touch twice in 7 days alter the 1.1.1 firmware if i didn't switch to 1.1.2 until after the new 3rd party apps are announced?

It just does my head in.

December 10 2007 at 4:28 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Matteo

I have posted my suspicions about the possibility of Apple launching an SDK for about 4 times on TUAW comments.

My opinion was, and still is, that Apple DELAYED the SDK because... Of Leopard!!! They delayed it because the iPhone is built arount a "version" of OSX Leopard and an early SDK for it would have spilled the beans. Moreover Apple was busy getting Leopard in the hands of customers on track, so they might have been focused on releasing that instead of the SDK for a product with a smaller user base.

The SDK for the iPhone and Leopard will surely be similar in some aspects (I AM NOT A TECHNICIAN, so be kind on me :-) ).

There is just one small piece of the puzzle missing... Apple, PLEASE, release an SDK for the AppleTV as well!!! Come on.. Please... Or make it part of Leopard's SDK...

October 18 2007 at 3:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
(01)

I thought it was going to be the bonus/surprise when Leopard dropped... Pretty sweet either way. This may temp me to get a Touch if free apps are available. I'm certainly not paying for everything off the iTMS.

October 18 2007 at 12:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Catt

I think they were planning this all along but due to our complaints and such they decided to step up the date sooner than later. That's great news b/c there are some fantastic 3rd party apps out there that I would like to use without having to hack the phone.

October 17 2007 at 11:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
adam

@ #58:

Please don't tell me that you buy into that BS that Scott Moritz reports! He has just gotten debunked on Engadget today for his report about a new 13.3" Macbook with an aluminum casing to be launched on the 26th along with leopard. He has one of the worst track records out there. Many people commented on Engadget's article recalling that he makes his money when AAPL stock goes DOWN so of course hes going to make up as much BS as humanly possible in order to make himself more money.

engadget link: http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/17/apples-got-a-new-13-inch-laptop-prepped-for-leopard-launch/#comments

daring fireball link showing what a liar he really is: http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/moritz_lala_land

October 17 2007 at 7:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thomas E. Miller

maybe ieye will see the light of day! Check out the concept!

http://www.createthefuturecontest.com/pages/view/entriesdetail.html?entryID=365

October 17 2007 at 6:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
scw

I think I will wait and see how their signing program worked. Symbian's program (Nokia) was so successful they announced major changes yesterday to lower the barrier of entry, and it is still $200 plus $20 per release. Assuming a $200 development environment cost (relatively cheap), one of my favorite applications, Books.app, would have cost the developer $860 so far.

Somehow I don't think we'd be reading books on our iPhone at that price.

And the S60 allows installing self-signed applications, which make this just a barrier for end users for no good reason.

Die, DRM, die!


October 17 2007 at 6:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
junkie

yipee

October 17 2007 at 5:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.