Skip to Content

Inc.com: iPhone is "next major computing device"

Zach Nelson at Inc.com has seen the future of computing, and it is the iPhone. He writes:

"Some people use it to play music. Others marvel at the photo-browsing interface, and some of its users just want to look cool. I don't care about any of those things when I look at the iPhone. What I see is the breakout of the next major enterprise computing platform."

This is basically what I said after my first full day with the iPhone. It's a portable computer that just happens to make phone calls, not a phone that performs a few tricks. Months later, my feelings haven't changed. I use it primarily as a computer (and an iPod) and occasionally as a phone. In fact, when I'm showing it off to people, the phone features (making calls, working with contacts, etc.) are what they're least interested in. Email and the internet are always first.

With that in mind, I'll share my ten favorite iPhone-optimized web sites.
  1. meebo. Nice AIM implementation. No frills, just function.
  2. PocketTweets. Until we get Twitterrific for the iPhone, I'll use PocketTweets. It looks nice and works.
  3. Leaflets. A portal for several useful iPhone-optimized pages. I especially like their Newsvine, Flickr and Major League Baseball implementation.
  4. JiWire. Quickly find public Wi-Fi in your neighborhood.
  5. Tomatometer. Find reviews on nearly any movie.
  6. MoviesApp. Somehow, pulling up movie times on an iPhone impresses people more than anything else.
  7. PopTakeout. Browse top headlines from Digg, Newsvine, Delicious, more. Plus, the Chinese takeout box icon is cute.
  8. MyPhoneFootball.com. No frills, just speedy updates on NFL scores and standings.
  9. Fumbleview. Real-time, java-powered play-by-play on your favorite NFL games plus chat. I love it.
  10. Weather Underground humiliates the iPhone weather widget.


Zach Nelson at Inc.com has seen the future of computing, and it is the iPhone. He writes:"Some people use it to play music. Others marvel...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

27 Comments

Filter by:
Life Info Zone

Mmmmmm nice story!!Thanks for sharing information with us.
keep up the work.
http://www.lifeinfozone.com/category/computing/

November 29 2007 at 5:45 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sparks

See, I had exactly the opposite reaction. Windows Mobile Smartphones (and to a lesser degree, Blackberry and Symbian devices) always leave me feeling no illusions about the fact that the device is a computer first and foremost and a phone is just one of the apps. In contrast, the 'Hi, I am a computer' aspect seems to just sort of step out of the way and let you DO things with the iPhone.

I dealt with Windows Mobile devices as my main smartphone for years, which are basically anemic little low-power computers. Windows Mobile makes no attempt to disguise the fact that you are dealing with a wannabe computer rather than a phone; the 'phone' app feels like a shoddy Visual Basic VoIP app, and in general I often felt like the device got in the way of what I wanted to do, rather than just doing it.

Then I tried the iPhone, and I thought, 'oh! It's a PHONE!' Because... well, the iPhone /is/ a phone. It is many other things, too, but still definitely comes across as a /phone/, not a computer with a telephony app. (Even though it IS a computer with a telephony app.)

If that makes any sense.

November 27 2007 at 3:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Likely

Yeah sorry Frank if it threw you but when someone says "It's a portable computer...." it frustrates me as for the life of me I can't get Photoshop to open on it, or Vienna, or.... the only thing it seems to do is make calls and browse the internet just like ALL my other phones over the past 40000 yrs, yes I'm prehistoric but then again....

8>)

November 27 2007 at 1:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
JKT

Rob:
I agree with your assessment of what SHOULD be. Companies SHOULD use standards. But there is reality. At my company (a bank whose credit cards you likely have in your wallet), we're a Microsoft shop and that infrastructure is not going to change anytime soon. Yet countless employees are clamoring for an iPhone. We simply cannot grant those requests as the iPhone won't do Exchange. As for MS unpublished interfaces, the Blackberry interfaces to Exchange just fine. Thus, it's a Blackberry these employees will get. And Apple is shut out. Needlessly. And my claim stands--that if Apple is ignoring Enterprise (which we both seem to agree it is), then the original article should not have used the term "Enterprise" in its iPhone claim.

November 26 2007 at 11:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
DaveR

I spent Thanksgiving weekend with my 75 year old father from Canada and he was wowed by my iPhone. He can't wait until it's released there. We have always been a family to go to a reference to settle an argument, and having that capability in my pocket with an elegant interface was impressive. Too bad the TUAW site is one of the slowest to load- it always hangs forever at the end and I impatiently stop loading.

November 26 2007 at 10:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ben the Dog

#22 - very good points re the drip-feed release

That said, I still want the damn thing in my grubby little hands :-)

November 26 2007 at 10:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
airmanchairman

Most gadget freaks that post here in their impatient fury can't seem to get past the current feature set of the iPhone when assessing its prospects for the near or far future (a fool uttereth all his mind, but the wise one keepeth it in till later, said Solomon).

I believe the article's author is talking about the emergence of the "convergence device" as the next mass-computing platform:
While the "jail-break" applications and the Webkit-legit ones written so far clearly show the vast potential of such a device, great care has to be taken at this early stage of development of the platform to avoid most of the irreversible pitfalls that PC development has fallen into. The implications of this potential are just too vast and complex to even begin to discuss here.
In this light, I am not in the least surprised at the "drip-feed release" approach by Apple, themselves a previous and tragic victim of several wrong turns in PC development.
One thing they are refusing to get wrong this time is neglecting to recover the vast sums they spend on Research and Development, thereby ensuring that they are not just going to be doing all the innovating for other gormless, witless and unimaginative parasites to run away with efforts they have not contributed to in any significant way. And believe me, from the USA through Europe and the Far East, those parasites loom large and thick as swarms of hungry locusts waiting for the next free ride...
Not this time, I suspect, not if the folks at Cupertino can help it. Once bitten, thrice shy.

November 26 2007 at 9:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
d

Great list! I'm a huge fan of www.textonphone.com for all my ebook needs. I recently discovered it and absolutely love it!

November 26 2007 at 9:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ben the Dog

Much as I hate to say it, the drip-feed release of such a cool device to half a dozen countries (so far) makes Apple look like a bunch of money-hungry chumps. I would love to love the iPhone, but Stevo and his marketing gimps won't release it in my country (and I'm not willing to buy a hacked iPhone that could potentially become an iBrick)

November 26 2007 at 9:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rob Menke

@JKT:

Why should he consider getting into the enterprise market? Microsoft has that hands-down, and as long as they control the de facto standards, Apple would end up chasing Microsoft forever. The margins at the enterprise level are just not worth that Sisyphean effort. As the saying goes, "Nobody got fired for buying Microsoft."

For every enterprise-level customer, there are a number of SOHO customers not tied to Exchange/Outlook, and are willing to embrace published protocols (IMAP, SMTP, LDAP, &c) without becoming reliant on Microsoft's proprietary extensions.

Apple's server offerings work well with Linux and Windows, because they follow the published rules. An iPhone will work well with a Linux server, because both follow the published rules. Only Microsoft's server offerings refuse to tell you what the rules are.

November 26 2007 at 8:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.