Skip to Content

Testing the iPhone's fake GPS



Mac|Life has a pretty neat breakdown of just how the iPhone's faux GPS work (or doesn't work, depending on the situation). Long story short, the Locations feature is pretty darn close-- unless you really do need GPS. On average, it seems like triangulation put the guessed location (represented by the blue pin in the pictures) off from the actual location (represented by the red pin) by about .5 miles.

Which is great if you just want to know where you are (which is what it was designed for, obviously). But not so great if you're actually trying to do something you'd need GPS for (like geocaching). Two drawbacks here -- I've been trying the Locations feature around Chicago, and I've found that if I try it more than once, or am moving, the app picks up a little better on where I'm at. Also, I've been in Chicago, and Mac|Life is in San Francisco, so it would be interesting to know how this works out where we might really get lost-- out in the country, farther away from cell towers.

Still, while it's not as precise as real GPSers might like, the Locations feature is pretty amazing for what it is. Your iPhone doesn't know exactly where it's at, but it knows close enough to get you where you're going.

Mac|Life has a pretty neat breakdown of just how the iPhone's faux GPS work (or doesn't work, depending on the situation). Long story...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

31 Comments

Filter by:
James

Hey, if Apple ever gets around to announcing their iPhone SDK, we might even see real GPS software, complete with plug-in GPS receiver, available for your iPhone. Then we'd be talking. I'm thinking $129 for GPS iPhone package made by Garmin or something. THAT would be incredible.

January 29 2008 at 5:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Andrew

Ten miles north of Boston the accuracy varies widely -- which I sort of think should be a place that is pretty well pegged for this sort of thing.

I've been amusing my infantile brain by "relocating" on iPhone maps while driving through known locations. My usual experience is that it shows a circle that seems a few hundred yards wide and I am within a half radius of that circle's center, rarely am I on or near the middle.

On my own doorstep it shows me off-center in a circle with a radius of at least two miles. 200 yards away it accurately shows on which of my neighbor's lawns I'm standing.

Disconcertingly I have had three or four experiences where the iPhone map had the circle drawn completely outside my current location. The circle was on the 250-yard sort of size, not the 1-2-mile size, so it thought it knew where I was but was substantially wrong.

I think that within this distance of a high-tech center like Boston, the accuracy, consistency, and precision should be higher than this.

January 29 2008 at 1:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
paul

I have a Helio phone, and they've had this same feature for years, so I'm used to it. If you're not on the ground floor or there's lots of hills, the location will be off by a few blocks or more. But other than that it's pretty accurate.

January 29 2008 at 12:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Andy Z.

you aware of the fact that the same feature is available for Windows Mobile and modern cell phones, with the location determination and route directions, right? (just look for google maps mobile.)

January 29 2008 at 11:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sterling

The earlier point about GPS requiring line of sight to satellites is a good one. This feature is stellar for what it is trying to be. It's not trying to be a replacement to GPS. I'm very happy with it.

January 29 2008 at 10:40 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Patrixck

also in brooklyn, accurate to about 30 feet...

January 29 2008 at 10:33 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sith

I found that it worked fantastic in downtown SF - was accurate to within an eighth of a block. In Minneapolis, it's a bit less accurate - more like 4-5 block radius on average. Presumably due to the lower density of Wifi access points here versus SF.

January 29 2008 at 10:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
frank.de.graeve

In Brussels it pinpoints almost to a couple of meters. Very handy.

January 29 2008 at 9:55 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joid

Ok, it's a nice geeky tool. But nothing beats GPS.

I hope it's not Cupertinos answer towards GPS. Not that, according to them, it's a good substitute, and therefor GPS won't be used in v2.

January 29 2008 at 9:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Matt Radford

I'm glad it works for the Mac|Life guys, but I'm not surprised it works like a treat in SF. My experience in the UK - or the Arctic as GMaps would have it - is quite different.

http://www.allaboutiphone.net/2008/01/upgraded-maps-in-firmware-113-still-needs-some-work/

Cheers

January 29 2008 at 8:28 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.