Skip to Content

AppFlow for the iPhone

Some enterprising iPhone developer named Erica Sadun (we hear she blogs for a fly-by-night Mac site) has been tinkering around with CoverFlow on the iPhone for a book she's writing, and while the result of my doing the same tinkering would be nothing but a broken iPhone, she instead pulls off the opposite: an enhanced iPhone.

AppFlow is a CoverFlow-style interface for launching iPhone apps and icons. You just install the app on your jailbroken iPhone, and then launching your favorite app is as simple as flipping to the icon and double-tapping. Webclips, we're told, are launched a completely different way, and thus not included in the flipping. But "maybe in a later update," our inside source told TUAW exclusively.

If this is the kind of stuff we're getting from Sadun before the SDK drops, just think what we'll see after. The woman's a genius. And it's almost surprising that Apple didn't think of this in the first place -- if it works in Leopard, and it works in the iPod of the iPhone, why didn't they give us the option to flip through apps in this way?

Update: AppFlow has been incorporated into XLaunch and now supports Webclips



Some enterprising iPhone developer named Erica Sadun (we hear she blogs for a fly-by-night Mac site) has been tinkering around with...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

52 Comments

Filter by:
James C.

Erica. How about coverflow for my iPhone contacts? Flipping through their pics would be great for we who remember faces not names.

February 23 2008 at 2:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
JZ

Is there a source code available =)?

February 23 2008 at 12:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Will

Pretty harsh comments here. I recall seeing a bunch of similar POC "crap" back when we were first trying to wrap our heads around this whole "mouse" thing back in '84.

It's from "crap" like this that everything else flow. Perhaps Cover Flow is inappropriate for applications, before you could only suppose, now you can KNOW if it works or if it doesn't.

In the mean time, we have yet more examples of how to do Things on the iPhone, whatever those Things are.

I don't have an iPhone, I don't know how to write code for an iPhone. But obviously, beyond the flaming hoops you have to jump through to simply get your code running on the device, the device itself offers a different modus of operation than a standard computer. So, all of those aged paradigms of operation that we're used to on normal computers need to get flung against this thing and tested so they can be discarded, improved or adopted.

Everyone is basically chomping at the bit for the SDK, until then there's going to be little "serious" work done on the machine.

After the SDK, who knows. Until then, let them play. Everything they learn, ideally, helps us all in the long ruin.

February 22 2008 at 2:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
billg

No, Erica isn't a genius or an amazing hacker -- a knowledgeable hobbyist at best.

The idea of launching applications from a coverflow interface fundamentally shits on usability, something extremely critical on mobile devices. Coverflow is *not* active function -- it is specifically for the quick perusal of nonessential, grouped information (#44 Larry's suggestion of coverflow for contacts is a much more appropriate idea.)

Considering the fluff, eye-candy sell of coverflow, do you really think Apple hasn't considered applying it to practically anything and everything?

Mobile phones need to be as simplistic as possible -- the interface must demand little attention and action for essential functions. The iphone improves on the godawful UI of previous phones, but it is already at a disadvantage without the ability to navigate by feel. The level of attention required to flip through a line of cascading icons to get to mapquest while driving is much more dangerous than the fraction of a second to habitually tap the brown icon third from top on a one or two pane panel.

People have enough trouble using cell phones without crashing into each other. Don't make it more difficult just for the sake of some stupid eye-candy.

February 22 2008 at 1:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to billg's comment
Duey Cheatham & Howe

I see this evolving into something more. Maybe she has other ideas and wanted to be sure certain parts of it would work. Some people write apps that appear simple but get more complex as they go along. I appreciate her work and her approach.

Quit bitching about everything. If you don't like it, don't install it. I wish some of y'all jive mutha fuckas complaining would write some apps for the device instead of crying when someone creates something y'all don't like.

I truly hate fucks like y'all. Instead of embracing the app & encouraging her to add feature all y'all do is fuckin complain about how useless it is. Hairy palmed, almost blind, meat beating masterbaters.

February 22 2008 at 1:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
billg

Well, Duey, you're going to have a sucky life if you get that upset over weblog comments. I have no sympathy for your delicate sensibilities and I'm not going to stop expressing my opinions.

I understand that anyone who doesn't join the Erica circle-jerk is going to get attacked with 500 useless replies like yours... the lollery of your self-defeating "if you don't like it, don't say anything and don't read it" logic. Considering you've only made one comment with the profile you're using, I wouldn't doubt this being a one-off from a tuaw staffer. Feel free to continue working yourself into a frenzy.

Regarding the topic at hand, calling me names isn't going to make an iphone coverflow for apps any less of a flawed idea.

February 22 2008 at 1:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
editiwizard

How about cover flow for contacts? I would love to be able to scroll through pictures of contacts and tap the desired person to call or email them. The best way to implement this would be flipping to landscape view while in the phone app, then the people you have in your contacts with pictures (mostly just family and friends) would then appear just like album coverflow.

This would really require the SDK but Apple probably won't be letting anyone mess with the phone app itself!

February 22 2008 at 11:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
x

blah... who cares, cover flow is about the slowest most in inefficient way to launch anything.

February 22 2008 at 9:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
JeFF

I'd like to second the notion from Chris - since Coverflow is meant for meandering, let us figure out when meandering itself may be most efficient. Contacts is ideal - I often remember faces better than names, so flipping through pictures may jog my memory. Part of the appeal of album Coverflow is the sensation of flipping through physical albums - would this carry over to photos? Anyone have other activities for which inefficiency is a positive trait?

February 22 2008 at 9:48 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Adrien

Because Apple design is based on choice not options!
And coverflow on the iphone seems pretty useless (to me) in opposition to the current and really touch-efficient presentation.

February 22 2008 at 8:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
chris

> ERICA : Can you do the same thing with the contacts pictures ?
In portrait mode you see your contacts names and in lanscape mode, the "Contact" app flick into the contactflow... ?

chris

February 22 2008 at 7:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mansoor Ehsan

cool...steve jobs would be interested ...may be..

February 22 2008 at 6:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.