Skip to Content

4 million iTunes songs disappear, speculations abound

Last week, Apple's iTunes Store turned 5 years old. Now the blogosphere is buzzing with the fact that Apple said they had over "10 million" songs in their library, then later changed the page to say "6 million." That's a difference of 4 million songs unaccounted for. MacNN did the math and said that if they had 10 million songs, it would have accounted for a 66% increase in their catalog in only a month. MacNN has before and after pictures of the iTunes Store page showing the changes.

So... typo? Or is Apple doing some weird shuffling of their library?

[via MacNN]

Categories

iTS iTunes Apple

Last week, Apple's iTunes Store turned 5 years old. Now the blogosphere is buzzing with the fact that Apple said they had over "10 million"...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

35 Comments

Filter by:
Peter

"MacNN did the math..."

Is it that hard to do the math? I guess bloggers aren't too hot on that...

May 05 2008 at 6:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
winkyeah

I think it's because Apple engineered a music quality assessment algorithm that analyzed the library and deemed that 4 million tracks are not in fact "music".

Did anyone check to see if there was still any Spice Girls in the library?

May 05 2008 at 1:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
PeterToo

And then there are of course the whole singles v. albums thing... lots and lots of tracks are on iTunes several times on that account alone.

May 05 2008 at 11:55 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
PeterToo

One possible explanation could be that different content for different countries might have made an accurate calculation a bit difficult.

With the same band signed to different labels in different territories, songs might have simply ended up being counted twice or more.


May 05 2008 at 11:53 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bob S.

"Typo"? I don't think I've ever reached for the 6 key and accidentally hit the 10 key instead.

May 05 2008 at 10:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kev Orng

I like how the comments are fulfilling the "Speculations Abound" part of the headline so we don't have to go looking very far.

They probably accidentally included the songs they downloaded back in those heady days when Napster was the anti-corporate bad boy, and LimeWire was trying to pretend they were legit, and the folks at Apple were like, "dude, we totally need to invent something to put all this free music in so we don't have to keep burning CDs. Or at least improve and re-market some existing technology."

May 05 2008 at 8:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
basscadet

it does sound like someone (from competition?) challenged them to prove those 10 m songs and they had to show the number of actual songs minus remixes or compilation doubles or songs deleted since last recount. Could it be that the 10 m number was out of thin air just to impress and was rectified just now?

May 05 2008 at 3:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to basscadet's comment
tjniels

Right, since Apple loves to back down from competition. Seems unlikely, I agree with others that there must have been an internal fuss over the definition of a song, or an effort to not double-count songs. Or MAYBE the competition is simply paying Apple to understate their collection an look bad? I somehow doubt that one as well.

May 07 2008 at 2:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sean

Damn it! To think I had just filled up my paypal account with $10MM to buy all the songs . . . at least I'll be making some good money off the 2.61% savings rate!

May 04 2008 at 11:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Fish_tattoo

Other then the comment section, where is the "speculation abound"?

May 04 2008 at 8:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ShaleX

The other several million, still kicking baby....

May 04 2008 at 8:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.