Mossberg, Pogue, Baig review the iPhone 3G
While most people are waiting in line for their soon-to-be new friend, pal and everyday communications device, the world's top tech reviewers have already been playing with the long awaited device. Below is a summary of their findings along with links to their full reviews of the iPhone 3G. Walt Mossberg (Wall Street Journal)
- Pros: Faster cell network data speeds, GPS
- Cons: Weaker battery life due to 3G/GPS
- Bottom Line: If you don't already have an iPhone and can live with the weaker battery life, then you should go ahead and buy; otherwise wait out for the 2.0 firmware update (hmm... I think I've heard this advice somewhere else)
- Pros: You can talk and access 3G data network simultaneously, cheaper, improved audio quality
- Cons: 3G isn't wide-spread, AT&T pricing,
- Bottom Line: "iPhone 3G is a nice upgrade," 2.0 firmware update will make your original iPhone in most ways similar to the iPhone 3G
- Pros: Faster data network, cheaper, GPS, Visual Voicemail
- Cons: Slow EDGE speeds when not in 3G area, no video, no memory expansion
- Bottom Line: "The Sequel, is worth the wait," he also shows a side-by-side comparison between EDGE and 3G speeds
Share
While most people are waiting in line for their soon-to-be new friend, pal and everyday communications device, the world's top tech...
Add a Comment
I found these reviews and a couple of others...
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2760826/31076560
Use this
http://www.newluddite.com/2008/07/round-up-of-iphone-3g-reviews.html
After careful consideration I've decided to pass on the iPhone 3G and stick with my current iPhone until the next model is released. While I really like the idea of having 3G both for the improved data transfer speeds and for the increased signal strength (ditto for the plastic case which should help with signal strength as well) and I love the idea of the GPS, those features alone aren't enough for me to upgrade. I can get 3G in the town I live in and if I travel south, but if I head north very far there isn't a 3G signal and I've got WiFi at home and it's in most places that I frequent so it's not a necessity. GPS is great, but the phone's built in triangulation off of cell towers does a good enough job if I'm ever really lost.
The above features are great, but I'd really also like to see a complete MMS implementation and a better built in camera that can record video. I'm not sure that $299 is worth an extra 8 GB in capacity, 3G and GPS when you factor in the extra $15 bucks a month ($10 for the 3G data plan and $5 for 200 text messages). I'd be looking at an extra $360 for the cell plan plus $299 for the phone for a total of $659 (without factoring in sales tax) for two years with the phone. If a complete MMS implementation was there along with a better camera I could justify it, but since I'm sure we'll see these things, plus additional improvements in battery life, in iPhone v3.0 I think I'll hold off.
The App Store is the real killer app and we iPhone v1.0 users will get that along with ActiveSync support, the ability to delete and move multiple e-mails and the contact search. It's really only 3G, GPS and in my case 8 additional GB's that I'll be missing out on. Given Apple's history I'm betting that if I hold off a year from now I'll be able to shell out the $299 and get a 32GB version that has 3G, GPS, better battery life, a better camera and hopefully a full MMS implementation (or a 3rd party app in the App Store that does the same thing).
Still with the iPhone MMS whining?
MMSs suck, an here's why: They are usually hard to create, you have to throttle down the size of anything you send, they take forever to upload to the network, and even longer (sometimes a few days) to get to their intended recipients if they even get there at all, they frequently just don't work on the recipient's phone or network, and they are billed like a higher priced SMS even though they are only using packet data.
Just use you email application and send your photos to: "Your Buddy's Phone Number"@"Their Carrier's MMS Address".com . They can reply or just send an MMS to your email address.
Email is easier to use and more widespread than MMS. Just my 2¢.
For reference:
Alltel = xxxxxxxxxx@message.alltel.com
AT&T (Cingular) = xxxxxxxxxx@mms.att.net
Boost Mobile = xxxxxxxxxx@myboostmobile.com
Cincinnati Bell = xxxxxxxxxx@gocbw.com
Sprint = xxxxxxxxxx@messaging.sprintpcs.com
T-Mobile = xxxxxxxxxx@tmomail.net
US Cellular = xxxxxxxxxx@mms.uscc.net
Verizon Wireless = xxxxxxxxxx@vzwpix.com
Virgin Mobile = xxxxxxxxxx@vmobl.com
Read the article here: http://iphone.macworld.com/2007/08/sending_and_receiving_mms_on_y_1.php
My main interest in the GPS is as a bicycle computer. I don't know much about GPS and have never used one. Do you folks think that an app would be possible? I'm thinking of something where I hit "start", go for a bike ride, and when I get back I can see how far I went, maybe with a map of my route. I'd be happy if it's accurate to +/- 5%. What about elevation? Will the iphone's GPS have elevation data or just latitude/longitude? It would be really nice if I could get an elevation profile, too! I don't really need it for "navigation".
Most of my bike rides are in areas with no phone service, GPS will still work, right?
If I can use the GPS this way, I'll go for the 3G. Otherwise I'll pick up a 2nd hand 16GB 1st gen iphone.
Thanks,
tys
All the reviewers talk about data speed, but what about the touted improvements in voice/sound quality? In exchange for the opportunity to review the phone early, my guess is that they had to agree to an embargo on providing details about certain features before launch, namely voice quality and the app store.
July 09 2008 at 12:06 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDoes anyone know if I get two iPhones on a family plan if I can get the $200 off discount off of both phones, or will I have to pay $200 more because the two phones are on the same plan?
July 09 2008 at 10:52 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyand if you want to have some $$ to spend on new apps, there is a contest underway at http://lifesuxdaily.com/contest_july/ with up to 300USD of iTunes gift cards !
July 09 2008 at 10:40 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyMy main interest in the GPS is as a bicycle computer. I don't know much about GPS and have never used one. Do you folks think that an app would be possible? I'm thinking of something where I hit "start", go for a bike ride, and when I get back I can see how far I went, maybe with a map of my route. I'd be happy if it's accurate to +/- 5%. What about elevation? Will the iphone's GPS have elevation data or just latitude/longitude? It would be really nice if I could get an elevation profile, too! I don't really need it for "navigation".
Most of my bike rides are in areas with no phone service, GPS will still work, right?
If I can use the GPS this way, I'll go for the 3G. Otherwise I'll pick up a 2nd hand 16GB 1st gen iphone.
Thanks,
tys
TomTom has already said that their nav software works on the iPhone: http://www.tuaw.com/2008/06/11/tomtom-nav-system-runs-on-the-iphone-already/
I'm not sure exactly how that fits into the "small antenna" claim, though.
Meh, I'll stick with my 2G version. Add MobileMe, I'm happy.
On a side Does anyone else find Walt's writing inexplicably dull??? It was a chore to read through his review, and his overuse of '. But' really annoyed me - he's supposed to be a professional writer.
I'm only complaining as I'm struggling to find work as a professional myself :(
@artaxerxes: Yeah, but like someone said above, AT&T promotes TeleNav on all their GPS-equipped phones, pretty much. You really think they won't try to take advantage of that on the iPhone? There's got to be ways around that statement (like not using Google Maps, since it's that language is sourced from the Google API restrictions).
Personally I'm hoping someone comes up with a solution that has the maps on the handheld itself, so you don't have to rely on cell service to use your maps when you're in the middle of nowhere, but I guess failing that I'll take what I can get...
He probably just means that the GPS accuracy lacks as compared to, say, a Garmin handheld GPS unit.
I'm sure the chip provides much better accuracy, for example, then their current cell-tower-triangulation method, but in a dedicated GPS receiver you have a decent sized antenna and a 12-channel receiver taking readings once a second, this can get you a reading within a few feet if you're under clear sky. Get buildings, clouds, or trees in the way and the accuracy drops, but that fatty GPS antenna can usually still find you within a couple of meters.
Cut to the iPhone, it wasn't designed as a GPS, it was designed as a phone with a GPS in it, so there are some compromises, and they're not compromises in the GPSes favor. For one, it's got to be a lower-powered GPS radio, to sip from the little battery in the iPhone. Another, like Progue said, is that the antenna has got to be smaller than that of other GPS receivers, and it's probably not in an ideal location either -- I doubt, for example, that the GPS antenna will be facing the sky if your iPhone is mounted on your dash.
All of these lead to a less accurate GPS signal.
My Garmin can show me exactly where I am in my yard...I'm thinking the iPhone GPS will more tell me that I'm at my house, as opposed to another house in the neighborhood -- still pretty accurate, but not quite as accurate.
Lastly, cell phone GPS units are dependent upon the cell network for their map data. This is an awesome advantage and disadvantage. It's awesome because you never have to pay for map upgrades. It stinks though as soon as you're trying to route and you don't have cell coverage.
So for 80-90% of what people use GPS for the iPhone will do just fine, but for sure if you want rock-solid navigation you might still consider bringing TomTom along.
The Google Maps terms of service specifically prohibit thgem being used for turn by turn services. Even if the iPhone had a 16 foot aerial, they could still not provide turn by turn based on google maps.
July 09 2008 at 8:05 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyMy thoughts exactly. AT&T slaps "TeleNav" garbage into every one of their phones these days, even Blackberrys. It's just a matter of time before someone writes the software to get this working.
And since when is David Pogue an expert on GPS systems? How does he even know what size that antenna is?
Even if the antenna is "too small" (which I read as not getting good enough reception, which I find hard to believe considering the number of phones that have perfectly sufficient GPS), at the end of the day the GPS programs will work just fine, they just might be a little inaccurate. Take Google Maps. If that works, then the GPS works. Maybe the error will be a little greater than, say, an industrial surveying GPS, but as long as you feed the program GPS coordinates, that's all that matters. All of these things have SOME kind of error, and these days it's rare that it's very much error at all anymore.
July 09 2008 at 8:12 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- miFrame Picture Frame Dock for iPad for $64 + $8 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
- Hannspree Apple-Shaped 28" 1080p LCD HDTV for $270 + free shipping
- Philips wOOx Alarm Clock Radio for Apple iPod / iPhone for $60 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



24 Comments