Skip to Content

MobileChat now available in the App Store

Today Twenty08 released a new instant messaging client for the iPhone/iPod touch. MobileChat (iTunes Link) allows you to connect to multiple IM services, including:
  • AIM/ICQ/.Mac/MobileMe
  • Windows Live/MSN
  • Yahoo
  • GTalk
  • Jabber
In many ways, this application for the iPhone looks like a cross between Adium and AIM for iPhone. This application is feature rich, allowing you to take and send images or IM a phone number from any of your 10 supported IM accounts, Most notably, MobileChat allows you to use Apple's forthcoming "Push Notification" system for notifications when the application is closed. This feature is built into this release, but will not be active until Apple "flips the switch." You can download MobileChat today from the App Store for $2.99 (USD).

[via MacRumors]

Today Twenty08 released a new instant messaging client for the iPhone/iPod touch. MobileChat (iTunes Link) allows you to connect to...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

57 Comments

Filter by:
notajerklikeyouguys

Wow, you guys are horrible jerks. do you not get that they have to HOST SERVERS to keep you always on?? That means they have recurring bandwidth cost as well as the requirement for server investment. What kind of greedy idiot do you have to be to demand that for free? They must be jerks for not paying your car payment or grocery bills too huh?

September 03 2008 at 4:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jackson.myers

I don't really have any need for an IM program to keep me connected even when I log out. Then if I connected on my Mac while my server side account was logged in I could see some problems. I'd be perfectly happy with something like Apollo AM, which worked very well for me with Installer.app. I'd even pay a few bucks for it.

Maybe when Push is implemented this might get interesting, but for now I'd rather keep it simple.

Palringo works okay, but I don't like the UI as much as Apollo...

August 22 2008 at 12:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
guenther

i found an irc client for iphone / ipod touch

rooms, itunes link:
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=288282245&mt=8

August 21 2008 at 10:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bleh...

Damn shame libpurple is liscened under the GPL. Looks like this guy stole their source and is charging for it. Not a dime goes back to the Pidgin Team of course.

BTW: This program used to be free on Installer, guess he decided he needed to charge people. Oh well, he won't get a dime from me. I'll wait till Apollo is updated and put on the jailbroken community.

August 13 2008 at 8:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MarkGo

For all the "just use AIM" folks. On my 1G iPhone, AIM has been a total disaster. On Edge, it simply doesn't work. On WiFi, it drained my battery in about 3 hours. First app I ever deinstalled.

I don't know if MobileChat is the answer, but I sure know AIM isn't.

August 13 2008 at 3:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ThePete

$2.99? Soon to be $4.99?? Why is it that so many of us iPhone-users are willing to pay for stuff that comes *with* most other smartphones (or can be added for cheap)??? Seriously, you guys ruin it for those of us who feel a dollar is worth something.

It's amazing what the iPhone can do, but it's also amazing what it can't do. Maybe the stuff it can do is the trade off--except, the stuff it can't do is so basic and *standard* on today's phones, it's a serious shock to discover so many basics are missing or are poorly implemented. (Sorry for the bad grammar, still waiting for the caffeine to kick in.)

Come on--my old Sidekick didn't charge extra for having the ability to IM. Sure, it didn't have GPS, but that's what made me switch--*more* features. Turns out, there are fewer.

IM is so much a part of our digital lives it's absurd to not offer an always-on IM client to iPhone users for FREE--or at worst, $1. An always-on or push (or whatever lets me get IMs all the time) IM client would sell like mad--charging more than $1 for it just makes developers look greedy.

This isn't some obscure need being met here, guys--this is *IM*.

You're going to make MASSIVE bucks on this. Don't be jerkweeds about it.

August 13 2008 at 11:58 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to ThePete's comment
Ben Belden

There ARE free IM apps available already from the App Store. No one is forcing you to pay for IM. And the developers aren't greedy. They are business people. They are offering a product for a price that they feel is justified.

This is akin to saying that Microsoft Office should be free or cheap because it's a word processing suite and something that most people will at some point need. And guess what? There are alternatives to Microsoft Office, some of them free, some of them not, as a response to this. No one is forcing anyone to buy Microsoft Office. But millions of people do, enought that they have no problem keeping the price high. If all it took was market demand, this would not be the case.

The fact is the developers obviously NEED the money. So many people downloaded and are using the app that it crashed their servers. In order to continue to support the app and allow it to function, they need new servers and bandwith and staff and everything else. I would imagine part of the reason they are charging for this is exactly because of that.

I don't even know who you feel is to blame here. You seem to be blaming the developer for charging for something that you think should be free. If this is the case, why aren't you blaming Apple for not including an IM client in the original iPhone software? If it's such a necessity that you can't have a usable smartphone without it, how do you explain the fact that Apple has already sold millions of iPhones and are prepared to sell millions and millions more?

And besides all of this, SMS offers essentially the same functionality as an IM client. It allows you to send messages to other people that they can quickly read and respond to. Granted, there are certain functions a dedicated IM client has that SMS doesn't, but they aren't essential. And if you need to send longer messages, pictures, basically whatever, use email. With email push notification, you'll get it just as fast as any IM client.

August 13 2008 at 10:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ThePete

I was referring to *actual* always-on IM clients. I thought I'd made that clear. So, they're business men--that precludes them from being greedy? I think it kind of guarantees it. I believe my point was that *I* felt their price *wasn't* fair--I'm not sure what you are gaining by simply repeating what I already assumed.

Actually, if you recall, the last HALF of my comment suggests they charge $1. Thanks for paying attention.

Regarding M$ Office, they charge too much, as well. It shouldn't be free, but I think it's pretty obvious that if they charged $10 or $20 for M$ Office (or say, that much for each part of Office) they'd sell a lot more copies.

Oh and news flash, there are plenty of alternatives to M$ Office--many of them cheaper or even free. So, guess what I don't have on my machine--yep. M$ Office.

Once again, thanks for paying attention. The ultimate point of my comment was that if they charged $1, they'd sell *even more* copies. I think they *should* have money--I just know that I, for one, won't pay $3.99 or whatever higher price they want to set. They want to follow the same, predictable business plan as other "business men," fine. They'll do it without my money, and I'm sure that's fine with them--all I'm saying is that I think they look greedy charging that much and I think they will sell more by charging less. I don't think that's an unreasonable thing to suggest.

I do blame Apple for not including a decent (read: comparable to the *Sidekick*) IM client for free. I blame them for having a closed system. I can install anything I want on my MacBook out of the box, but my phone? Nope--and if that's not enough, His Steveness can shut down any apps on my iPhone at whim. I blame Apple for a lot of lameness in the iPhone. I had hoped developers would pick up the ball Jobs dropped. I had hoped they wouldn't try to take advantage--silly me--I forgot they are "business men."

For the third time, you keep insisting that I demand that the developers of MobileChat charge nothing for their app--my point was that they could make "MASSIVE bucks" if they charged $1 or did you not read that part of my comment?

As for why so many people bought iPhones--are you seriously asking me that question? Because it's the iPhone, why do you think?? It's Apple--the hype around this thing has been insane. People call it the Jesus Phone. The thing is, people are wrong. People are stupid or assume things will be there but aren't (like me).

That's pretty much what I said in my comment, as well--that I assumed Apple would have the basic stuff AND the new cool stuff. Instead, I just traded sideways. Cooler stuff, but at the cost of something as basic to computing as *multitasking* (it's not just an IM client that is missing from the iPhone basic feature-set, but the ability to have more than one app up at a time). Are you really going to defend Apple for not allowing their phone to multitask???

You can't compare SMS to IM, dude--not by a long shot. Instant messages are FREE. SMS messages cost. You need a whole extra add-on to your wireless plan to get them unlimited, so once again, you're all for people spending more for the same abilities they had before for free.

I can't decide if you're a developer or a business man. Either way, you must have a different value of money than I do. You want to spend too much on something that should be cheaper (or even free) go right ahead, but please don't criticize me for wanting to get my money's worth. I regret getting my iPhone for a lot of reasons--a lack of a decent IM client is one of them. I have a lot of other cool things with my iPhone, so I'm not running back to the Apple store-but it's sad when people decide to make money off of an intentional shortcoming. It's called "exploitation of a need" when someone charge so much.

August 13 2008 at 11:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
lgivens

Remember this, you need to install a whole heck of a lot of server equipment to handle millions of messages per day for Apple's Push Notification service. Palringo and MobileChat do not own the networks, so they will have to funnel all users to a proxy to maintain state. Just wait for AIM for iPhone in Sept. for push.

August 13 2008 at 11:45 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
DR

People should remember that services like this, and Palingro, may represent a privacy and security risk. You are essentially giving to a third-party company your username, password and full contact list. This may not bother everyone, but you should at least be aware that your personal data is in the hands of strangers.

This isn't a flame against the MobileChat of Palingro products, just a heads-up to people who might not have realised that in order for this functionality to work, these companies are essentially "impersonating" you via their servers to the actual AIM/MSN/Jabber/Gtalk servers elsewhere. Every message you send and receive goes via their systems. The companies themselves may be entirely trustworthy, I have no reason to think otherwise, but also know that such clearinghouses of valuable identity information, and personal chat data could be highly attractive to the bad guys.

Make an informed choice about whether or not you want to risk it. Personally, I won't.

August 13 2008 at 8:58 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to DR's comment
prolix21

yeah, there have been a lot of questions on their site (in comments) about the security of their product. i'm not aware that any of this has been addressed by the developers, but it sounds like they're a bit busy at the moment...

it could be perfectly secure for all we know, or they're just storing all our accounts in a text file un-encrypted...

August 13 2008 at 11:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jash Sayani

Why would anyone pay 3 bucks for this when Palringo does the same thing for free...?

August 13 2008 at 8:53 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
FoundInTheFlood

nobody outside of the USA using AIM ? What about icq, which works fine with the AIM app since AOL bought ICQ a few years ago?
you knew that? :D just enter your icq number and PW in AIM for iphone

August 13 2008 at 8:10 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to FoundInTheFlood's comment
Jon Wise

does anyone in the world still use ICQ?
i have a super low ICQ number, and used to have hundreds of contacts. every once in awhile I sign in, just for kicks, and no ones there but some crickets and some ad-bots...

August 13 2008 at 9:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
FoundInTheFlood

i have about 100 people in my list ... icq is still popular with old-school gamers and SOME new users, most girls use MSN, since it sucks but looks pretty because it is white ;D

August 13 2008 at 10:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.