Skip to Content

Rumor: Case manufacturer drawings show smaller iPhone 'nano'?

Our sister site Engadget notes that iDealsChina found this rendering of a silicone case for a new iPhone-like device with a smaller form factor.

iDealsChina says the case is "in production," and has many 3D images of a variety of angles. The device may be unveiled during Macworld Expo next month. The site also claims the "iPhone nano" will have three "sensors," a camera, a "mirror screen" and no 3G. The device will allegedly start production on December 20th at a rate of 60,000 to 80,000 units a day.

This falls in line with unsourced rumors of a wireless product slated for announcement at Macworld. It could wind up being the magic $99 Walmart iPhone that we've heard so much about.

The look of the new iPod nanos was leaked (famously by Kevin Rose) earlier this year as a result of a supplier showing off renderings of new cases for the device. According to iDealsChina, "...once one company starts making a mold their information is passed onto other mold companies or accessory companies through a China underground network."



Categories

Macworld Rumors iPhone

Our sister site Engadget notes that iDealsChina found this rendering of a silicone case for a new iPhone-like device with a smaller form...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

12 Comments

Filter by:
Aaron Uribe

If this is true, what would be wrong with a phone/iPod that actually works? You could still sync your contacts, calendar and music as now. Just no apps or internet. No $30 extra monthly, but yet another iTunes customer.

January 06 2009 at 9:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
xxhadow1

Actually this would be a perfect way for Apple to skirt the AT&T exclusivity stuff since it wouldn't technically be an iPhone they could have it on all other carriers as a way to get an iPhone like device in the hands off the masses!

January 02 2009 at 4:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Hordakker

This is the MinIphone,it's a knock off from China. I bought one just for calling as a second phone, and they're actually quite cute in black. Pink available for gals...

December 17 2008 at 12:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
JoeB

Reeks of fake.

December 15 2008 at 4:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mark Fleser

Why would a case manufacturer have this information? Why do you think it takes a couple weeks for iPhone/iPod cases to start appearing, they have to redesign the cases and produce them.

Probably just a mockup or they're trying to get the hype going.

December 15 2008 at 4:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jeff Brown

Another fake rumor IMO. Apple just isn't very interested in low end/margin products. How would apps run(with fewer pixels), what sort of browsing experience would that tiny screen give you? Right now the worst part of the iPhone experience is the tiny keys - how small would they have to be on this thing? It runs totally against the vision. Take away apps and Safari and it's just a phone with a music player - there are plenty of those out there, and I doubt Apple wants to get in that low-end rat race.

To me it is another one of those ideas (like tablets and netbooks) that sounds great, but doesn't play to Apples strong points, so it would wind up being disappointing (or at best unprofitable) when you actually saw it.




December 15 2008 at 3:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jeff Brown's comment
badweasel

I agree.. it's not a phone. What's the point of smaller than the iphone? no 3G - so what, edge?

Wouldn't there be clues in the SDK to back up the idea of a smaller phone?

December 16 2008 at 1:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jeff

nah.

December 15 2008 at 2:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
James

What would be the point of making it smaller? Congratulations you have less storage AND fewer apps on each screen!

I could see releasing a 4GB without a contract for $150 but not scaling the size at all.

December 15 2008 at 2:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to James's comment
Jeff

the part cost difference for memory isn't enough to matter.

Why would Apple re-release the 4gb at a cheaper price point when it would be an inferior product, but not actually any better for the bottom line?

I just don't see that happening. i see capacities getting larger, not smaller. (prices may drop, but specs probably won't.)

December 15 2008 at 2:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
evansg

This will be announced at MacWorld, and will be a cheaper contract free iPhone.

December 15 2008 at 2:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
3rdpig

Nothing like rumors and leaks to start revving the hype machine.

December 15 2008 at 2:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.