Skip to Content

Tracking the iPhone hype generator

Fortune's Apple 2.0 got a nice little graph up of just where and when the iPhone's hype machine went into overdrive. There's no question it was a gigantic brand last year, but what's interesting is just how manufactured and "by design" each of those spikes are. B on the chart above is the actual iPhone launch, and E and F are the 3G debut and store launch. Fortune relates point A to the Cisco lawsuit against Apple over the "iPhone" name, but let's be real: that was just part of the story of the gigantic iPhone reveal (which took place one day before, not two).

So the real story here isn't necessarily that Apple masterfully created a smartphone that revolutionized the industry and made tons of money doing it, but that they coordinated a hype machine that marched to their tune whenever they wanted. The red line above, as you can see, is Palm, and while there are a few spikes along that line (probably interest in various new products and releases), there's nothing like the excitement and hype that shoots up around a big Apple event. The iPhone is a feat of engineering in itself, but the hype machine behind it is pretty well-built, too.

Fortune's Apple 2.0 got a nice little graph up of just where and when the iPhone's hype machine went into overdrive. There's no question...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

9 Comments

Filter by:
Luna Lovegood

"So the real story here isn't necessarily that Apple masterfully created a smartphone that revolutionized the industry..."

"Revolutionized"... I do not think it means what you think it means.

February 19 2009 at 8:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
williamlane

http://www.misterbg.org/AppleProductCycle/

:)


February 18 2009 at 11:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
repsode

Yeah, most ordinary people on the street don't use the word Android (yet). All adverts I've seen for the G1 don't have the word in there, just "With Google" so "google phone" would be more pervasive.


As for the iPhone, I'm going to agree with Hawkman that the Apple community, not to mention the gadget crowd in general, had of course been dreaming of a once mythical iPhone for a few years prior. Apple didn't need to introduce hype. We'd done it for them with constant rumours and speculation. We focused so much on it in the run up to announcement that the end result in that graph was inevitable.

I'd actually go as far as to say the "Cult of Mac" needs no orchestrated hype at all for any product. We come up with crazy rumours all the time. We build up anticipation around them, flip out if they true or fume that we got it wrong. It really doesn't need much input anymore.

Part of the reason I love this community. It's so passionate.

February 18 2009 at 6:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to repsode's comment
VanillaSpice

Yeah, definitely. The author is basically saying, well, because the iPhone was a common search term, then that must mean that Apple created a lot of hype. Which is flawed reasoning at a most base level. One, lots of people might have been interested without any hype existing. Two, there may have been hype, but not hype created by Apple, just the normal hype you would expect when a device that had been anticipated for years is released or announced. Three, Apple might just have been doing the normal things that all companies do when they announce or release a device - send lots of press releases; put ads in mags, on TV, and on the net; try to generate buzz, etc. It is not an Apple "hype machine"! That is just a pejorative way of saying that they do what every other company does.

February 18 2009 at 8:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bob

I love google trends. Here is the "google phone" and the G1

February 18 2009 at 5:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Hawkman

I'm not sure it's Apple's doing, particularly. That smells of paranoia. The most reasonable explanation is the prevalence of Apple-orientated sites (like this), and the outspokenness of many Apple fans; not to mention the years of rumour, longing and anticipation. The internet is just a giant echo chamber for all of that.

February 18 2009 at 5:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ichibon

I fail to see how Android is so low on the chart

February 18 2009 at 4:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to ichibon's comment
Ashwin

A lot more people refer to Android with "google phone", so it is artificially low, but granted, still a lot less than the iPhone.

February 18 2009 at 5:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ethan

Yeah, it's a more segregated brand. People are probably searching for g1 or gphone or google etc.

February 18 2009 at 6:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.