Eminem loses iTunes royalty case
Eminem's production company, FBT Productions, has been arguing that their artist is entitled to half of all royalties generated by sales of his music in the iTunes Store. Of course, Apple takes a commission before the artist receives their compensation. FBT's argument hinged upon whether the arrangement constitutes a licensing agreement.MacNN reports that a Los Angeles jury decided no, iTunes is simply another distribution channel, so Em will not be receiving the $1.47 million he was after. Bummer, dude.
This certainly isn't the first time Eminem's legal team has clashed with Apple's. Back in May of 2005, Apple was forced to pull an iPod ad that featured a young user singing (Rapping? Speaking?) the lyrics to "Lose Yourself." The story at the time was that Eminem refused to give Apple permission to use the song, but they did anyway.
Later that same year, the folks at Lugz footwear had Apple pull an Eminem-approved TV ad that looked a lot like their own. Oops.
Share
Categories
Eminem's production company, FBT Productions, has been arguing that their artist is entitled to half of all royalties generated by sales of...
Add a Comment
Although Eminem's music was what the case was about, Eminem was not actively involved in this case and made it clear that it was between FBT and Interscope, not him and Interscope.
March 10 2009 at 2:46 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIs there a link to the Eminem music video from 2005? I'm curious to see it.
March 09 2009 at 7:33 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyYes, but nearly everything mainstream sucks now-a-days. While I agree, Rap was better late '80s, early '90s, but if you dig deep enough, you still get some awesomeness-ess.
March 09 2009 at 5:11 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyTUAW, I think you have it wrong. Eminem's lawsuit was not with Apple, but with Universal record company. In the US, Apple pays all the royalties to the record labels and they pay the royalties out to the appropriate people.
The way I understand things, Eminem's publishing company was arguing that Universal wasn't given them the share they were entitled to.
On top of that, Apple's cut is far less than 50%. So the argument as described above would make no sense.
March 10 2009 at 7:17 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyTUAW!?!?!?! This has been on 20 other sites before you posted it, and you still posted it wrong. Eminem had zero involvement in it, it was his production company.
"(Rapping? Speaking?)"
Granted, Eminem isn't the best person to listen to to realise the art of the Rap/Hip-hop culture, but have you got a justified reason for taking down Rap music with that comment?
Listen to some Public Enemy, A Tribe Called Quest or the Wu-Tang, then come back and we'll talk.
Hot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Altec Lansing Octiv Duo iDock for $48 + free shipping
- Used Apple iMac 17" Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz for $430 + $28 s&h
- Lounge Deluxe Stand for iPhone / iPod touch for $28 + $8 s&h
- Brookstone Surround-Sound Earbuds for $14 + $7 s&h
- Refurbished Skullcandy Tokidoki Smokin' Buds Mic'd Headset for $5 + $2 s&h
- Stitchway Backup Battery for iPod / iPhone for $5 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



15 Comments