Baby Shaker further exposes App Store flaws
Update: According to news.com.au, Apple has issued an official apology for letting this app onto the store.Sometimes, you really have to question the App Store approval process.
Sure, this isn't the first time that Apple has made an unwise decision regarding the approval (or lack thereof) of applications to the App Store. But, this one takes the cake. For the span of a few hours on Wednesday, Apple allowed the release of "Baby Shaker," an app from Slkalosoft (ironically, the company no longer has the app listed on its site). The application displayed an image of a crying infant. You had to shake the iPhone or iPod touch repeatedly in order to get the child to stop crying -- literally shaking the baby to death. When the crying ceased and two red Xs appeared over the baby's eyes, you succeeded.
There's plenty of criticism over App Store standards. You can find a plethora of fart-simulating apps and other programs designed just to be a sheer nuisance, yet legitimate apps such as Tweetie get caught up in the pipeline because of potentially offensive language. "Baby Shaker" quickly hit a lot of news sites, and it didn't bode too well for an Apple doing its best to spotlight its second quarter earnings.
App Store approval is already something that is cumbersome and vague at best -- often leaving developers in limbo as to the status of their product. "Baby Shaker" certainly isn't the first dubious piece of software released into the App Store, but it is by far the worst. Even though Apple did yank "Baby Shaker" within a couple of hours, it does leave a nasty taste in people's mouths. It means that somewhere, somehow, there was a failure to communicate to employees that releasing an application promoting infanticide is a moronically stupid move. I do wonder how long "Baby Shaker" would have remained in the App Store if the media suddenly hadn't jumped on the story. What do you think this latest situation says about the App Store process? Let us know in the comments.
[Via CNet]
UPDATE: Apple has apologized for the app's release. [thanks to Paul for the tip]
Share
Categories
Update: According to news.com.au, Apple has issued an official apology for letting this app onto the store. Sometimes, you really have to...
Add a Comment
Hello, I am newbie here, This is a nice website Welcome to my website:
http://www.zuneconverter.net
Thank you very much.
What! who didnt have a laugh when Maggie caches Bart playing a game boy game that was about killing babies with a bazzoka? if i remember well later on that same episode she seemed to really like the game herself... lol
April 30 2009 at 2:53 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplySo what happens when anybody and submit any app to an 'open' app store, id est one without Apple's approval process.
Jew Killer? Slap That Ho? Tip-over The Kid in The Wheelchair?
Is moral acceptance something Apple or even Goole should always police? In a truely open app distribution, the KKK would release an app promoting themselves.
Personally, I think this is something of a wakeup call to a lot of people, especially Apple themselves.
They need to get their heads in the game, because when awesome apps like Tweetie get rejected, and this one slips through, you know that someone isn't doing their job properly
aren't there lots of apps and games where the point is to kill people?
with bullets?
or lasers?
or bombs?
or throwing them off cliffs?
yes shaking a baby to kill it is sick. as is our society in general. especially "people" who suggest others kill themselves because they disagree with some of their opinions.
how is censorship on the iphone going to solve that?
While I'm at it...
How about an app that measures how retarded you are by how much you shake the iPhone when trying to hold it perfectly still? The gimpy crippled spaz crowd will love it!
// being a gimpy crippled spaz myself, I can say that... but don't you say it or I'll kill your ass... eventually...
I can't honestly believe that this wasn't done on purpose. I fully believe that this was the result of a disgruntled developer whose app has been affected by the seemingly random approval criteria Apple seems to have set up. Was the game a good idea, no, not at all. But do I think it worked, yes, yes I do. I think we'll see some good come out of this. But it had to be on purpose, the timing is almost too good.
April 24 2009 at 2:41 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replythere is NOTHING WRONG WITH THE APP. big deal. you are taking away the "freedom" of the programmer. this is what open source is all about even if its dark and crazy like "shaking baby app". i'm all for it. if you don't want to support it or download it then DON'T. you guys need to grow up and be adults and let free capitalism keep moving. as soon apple starts regulating programmers will stop making great apps.
April 24 2009 at 12:20 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply@ Paul
Lemme guess, you're like 19 huh? Life experiences will help to add clarity down the line. Until then, best to take the advice of Mark Twain. It's better to have yourself thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Peace out!
Yep, surprise! In dealing with - literally - tens of thousands of app submissions, a few mistakes are made. It represents an error rate that is incredibly low.
Unlike claims about "I Am Rich" and other apps, this *is* a case where an app was approved that should not have been. But as soon as Apple were alerted to the situation, they rectified it. Hardly a story.
What amazes me is that the same people who criticise Apple for this app, are the ones who criticise them for the length of time it takes to get an app approved. You cannot have it both ways - either you want a quicker, but more error-prone process; or you want a slower, more comprehensive process.
No, what truly amazes me is that a process that has an error rate of much less than 0.1% is so resoundingly and repeatedly criticised. I think Apple ought to be congratulated for assessing more than 99.9% of submissions correctly, because that is a truly enviable success rate.
Ok... and your point with this article?
Seriously... people get touchy over the dumbest things. Oh my god, satire that goes across the grain of my ethical boundaries... quick, burn it and whoever created it before they can strike again!
Next thing you know, they'll be drawing cartoons of Muhammad that'll drive terrorists to kill us all!
Besides, how many times have we had instances where we'd like to really shake a baby to death? If anything, this would be a much more suitable substitute than the real thing in the grand scheme of things.
Don't you feel safer driving your minivan at night knowing your odds being carjacked are significantly reduced thanks to all the kiddies out playing GTA4 instead?
I am pretty sure that the argument about whether replacement therapy mitigates, or creates and encourages, the urge to commit crimes is still open; i.e. we don't yet know if having all the kiddies play GTA4 will increase or decrease the number of carjackings.
April 23 2009 at 10:46 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDeals of the Day
more deals- Used Apple iPad 64GB WiFi + 3G for $240 + free shipping
- AviiQ Portable USB Charging Station with cable rack for $54 + $8 s&h
- Dual USB Car Charger Adapter for $2 + free shipping
- Skullcandy 50/50 Earbuds for $25 + free shipping
- Monster Beats by Dr. Dre iBeats Earbuds for $39 + free shipping
- USB Data Charger Cable for iPhone / iPod 3-Pack for $2 + free shipping
61 Comments