Skip to Content

Our iTablet Dreams: What TUAW is wishing for

Last week the topic of the iTablet ranged into dream territory as we TUAWians discussed this speculative post over at Technologizer. Although some team members expressed reservations about the iTablet and its possible limitations, others of us let our hopes range free. With apologies to Robert Browning, at least I think it is Robert Browning, if our dreams do not exceed Apple's grasp, then what is the imagination for? So keeping that expansive philosophy in mind, here are the TUAW wishlists for the possibly probably upcoming tablet.

Erica Sadun:

While I'm still hoping for a dockable, one that works as a Snow Leopard desktop when docked and runs iPhone OS on the go, I'm not holding my breath either. Today's MacBook storage and battery options prove that with a dockable tablet, I could bring my entire world with me and use that world for reasonable periods of time -- but it would take a significant engineering effort to merge iPhone's ubiquitous touch screen technology with standard Mac OS X interaction models.

So, will the tablet really run Snow Leopard? Er, probably not. But could you imagine a MacBook shell, where you could slide the tablet into a frame where the screen normally sits? That would be freaking awesome.

Even as an iPhone-OS-only solution, an iTablet would provide wealth of on-the go applications through App Store. Assuming no great leaps forward beyond what we're already seeing in the iPhone OS 3.x SDK, an iTablet would be ready to provide existing iPhone capabilities with a beautiful big screen to work with.

If I had to pick two features that I'd want to see added, though, they would be wireless support for external keyboards and ubiquitous TV-out. Although the on-screen keyboard is fine for tip-tapping data into fields, there will be times that a tablet user might want to unfold a portable Bluetooth keyboard and use that for data entry.

TV-out support is currently limited to movie playback. Extending that to general application output would help position an iTablet better into the business presentation world. It would also be nice if an Apple Remote of some kind could be used with an iTablet.

Even without these features, an iTablet limited to the current iPhone OS will be a major technology leap forward just due to the increased screen real estate. I can't wait to start playing with big-screen iPhone applications!


Steve Sande:

The main reason I have a MacBook Air right now is because a) I have to travel frequently, b) I hate carrying around a heavy laptop, and c) I need to be able to show PowerPoint and Keynote presentations through PC projectors. Since I can't do this with an iPhone, I d) need the laptop.

If Apple produces a tablet that is even lighter than a MacBook Air, has video-out capabilities, and features built-in wireless broadband for Internet connectivity "everywhere," I'll be very interested. If that tablet also has 10 hour battery life, some compelling killer touch apps, and can also replace my Apple TV, I'm in. If it's running Mac OS X instead of iPhone OS, I'll be standing in line to buy one the minute it's announced.

Why do I want Mac OS X on a tablet like this? I'd like to be able to run my existing Mac applications on it. Of course, the very fact that such a device could cannibalize sales of the three MacBook product lines is a compelling reason for Apple to make it an iPhone OS device. As long as the iPhone development community can use the extra real estate on an 8.9" or 10" screen to give me Mac OS X-like functionality in a thin tablet, I can live with iPhone OS.

One more thing -- it would be cool if handwriting recognition through Inkwell or some other method was enabled for making quick handwritten notes and drawings, and of course building in the 2009 version of Newton Intelligent Assistance capability would be awesome, too!

Michael Jones:

Personally, I'd love to see the device have the option of running standard OS X (with touch-based enhancements, of course), but also be capable of many of the touch features that iPhone OS has. I'd be an extra bonus if it could run iPhone apps without modification, but I'd be willing to do without that in favor of having a true OS X install. I don't want to see the device locked down like the iPhone is, since it will likely not have phone capabilities and therefore won't be subject to the whims of AT&T and friends. Also, like Steve, I'd love to see handwriting capabilities -- there's really not much point in a decent sized tablet without being able to jot down notes or draw up quick diagrams.

As for the hardware, as much as I would love to see a MacBook combo tablet where the screen pivoted around, we know Apple probably has something new and breakthrough up their sleeves. I'm betting the device will be just the screen, and will be impossibly thin and light, similar to holding a MacBook Air display in your hand (without the rest of the laptop, but probably a comparable weight and thickness for other components and the battery.) I'm also holding out for custom apps that will allow you to control another Mac easily from the tablet, making it ideal to use during presentations.

Chris Rawson:

I'm not really in the market for a tablet-sized device. I've got a 17" MacBook Pro to do my heavy computing, and an iPhone to do lighter tasks when I'm on the go. For me, the gap in functionality between the two doesn't seem wide enough to justify a whole new device that's halfway between an iPhone and a MacBook. Plus, one of the greatest things about the iPhone is it's a computer that fits in your pocket, something an iTablet wouldn't be able to do.

In order for me to get really excited about an iTablet, it would have to be more than a gap-filler between the iPhone and the MacBook. It would have to be revolutionary, a device that does something neither existing product is able to do.

If it had built-in 3G that wasn't tied to any one particular wireless provider, that would be a truly killer feature. A device with "anywhere" Internet access, but not chained to a provider like AT&T, would be exactly the kind of revolutionary product I've been dreaming of. Unfortunately, unless Apple decides to erect its own worldwide 3G network, iPhones and/or iTablets will never realize their true potential.

Most of all, I'm simply looking forward to the device being released at last, whatever its features. Ten years of foreplay is a bit much.

Joachim Bean:

I'm hoping for something portable, solid, and hoping that it's fantastic to use. I'm want it to provide a great user experience, just like the iPhone does. I also hope that it's built of aluminum, something to withstand heavy usage and that will hold up well. As far as the OS, I hope that it fits in with the dimensions and features of the device, and it would be neat if it ran the iPhone OS. Finally, I would expect something around the 8-10 inch range, which would make it a good device to work and play on, while being portable at the same time.

Aron Trimble:

I'm with Erica on this one... I am reminded of an Apple patent for a display/dock combination in which the MacBook/iTablet/whatever slid horizontally into the unit. The fact that all current MBPs have ports (power, display, USB) on the left and optical drives on the right side of the enclosure give me hope that one day this product will be real.

My ideal iTablet would run Snow Leopard or iPhone OS depending on which suited my tastes at the time. Running an instant-on, low-power iPhone OS on a tablet that got 10 hours or a full-blown install of Snow Leopard on the same device at 5-7 hours would be most excellent.

Tim Wasson:
I know the Apple worked wonders with the iPhone by eliminating the stylus and making the whole thing work with only your fingers, but my hope for an iTablet would bring back the pen for all of us wannabe illustrators out there. If the iTablet had a pen/stylus support and pressure sensitive screen, I could get rid of my Wacom Cintiq and work directly on my iTablet in coffee shops, on the couch, or wherever I wanted. The Cintiq is way too clunky to move anywhere.

I guess for me, I'd want the iTablet would be a really expensive replacement for my sketchbook.

Of course, that would require a full OS X installation and applicable software (Painter, Photoshop, etc.). A dock would be nice but, for me, not a necessity. I can't imagine it would replace my MacBook Pro so I'd probably never work on it outside of tablet mode.

Victor Agreda, Jr.

In the spirit of the iPhone, first touted as "An iPod, a phone and an Internet communicator," I'd like to see the gap-filling device aimed squarely at the average consumer. An Apple tablet form factor device would serve as a photo frame, family calendar, internet communicator, and everything else folks have mentioned. Whether it runs Snow Leopard or iPhone OS is largely immaterial to me (although I see cases for both).

Outside of the Duo-esque form factor Erica describes, I doubt I'd use a tablet as a work machine -- not even with screen sharing. But as a centralized home media manager and internet communicator? That intrigues me. The ability to create a family calendar on any Mac and have it displayed on your wall (along with photos) can't be underestimated when talking about the home user. The latest functions of the iPhone 3GS, like video editing, would be great, and I think could be expanded upon. iChat, for example, and with video this time.

While I love the idea of a cell radio in the tablet, I'm leery of adding yet another monthly bill just to have a simple stay-at-home jumbo iPod touch.

Michael Rose

I understand my colleagues' desire for a tablet device running Mac OS X. Sadly, it is not going to happen -- at least not with an Apple box around it, since you can already pick up the Axiotron Modbook if you want. The iTablet will be running iPhone OS, and faced with that reality there are a few use cases where I can see this product really breaking out of the pack:

Kidtainment. Yes, it's expensive as a family product, but so were in-dash DVD players at first, and those found a market. Give the HD video experience and the gaming oomph of the App Store to families and watch them go.

CloudPad. We're moving past the App Store and back to the always-on, demand-and-receive application capabilities of online suites. Take the MobileMe and iWork.com experience, sprinkle in the JavaScript speed of the latest Webkit builds, and get ready to rumble with Google and Microsoft's browser-based productivity tools.

Final Cut Touch
. It may seem contrary to think about power video editing on a device with less than 100 GB of storage, but imagine the sheer grace and effectiveness of a drag, stretch, drop and sweep-based UI for video editing work. Offer a model with a hard drive and a USB or Firewire port, and suddenly you can take your motion work with you wherever you go.

Last week the topic of the iTablet ranged into dream territory as we TUAWians discussed this speculative post over at Technologizer....
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

48 Comments

Filter by:
al

I'm the kind of guy whose literally on the go everyday. You see I drive a bus and my shifts are split shifts with anywhere from 2 to 4 hours downtime between routes. During my downtime I usually kill time with a book but with a new Itablet I could kill time in so many different ways as well as use it for work. The main uses for me would be as a multimedia device such as an ereader, video games, mp3 player and movie player. One feature (or app) I would really want offered would be an organizer so as to keep track of my work schedule (time and place I would start my route, my days off etc) as well as appointments, due dates of bills etc. This app would really rock if after I entered it the app could maybe remind me depending on the work, appointment, bill due date etc by maybe using a ring tone as a warning so I would not forget.

One huge feature I would really like to see is I would hope that Apple would give its customers the option of forgoing on a extra monthly bill for internet access and just allow us to tether the Itablet with an Iphone or whatever cellphone we have. Now that would really rock. Yeah yeah I know I'm living in a dream world.

Battery life I'm not to concerned about as long as I could get 4 to 6 hours life from the device I would be happy. Hopefully Apple will also provide other items to compliment the Itablet such as a recharging dock or maybe a nice stand so as to be able to prop the tablet up and sit back and watch a movie as well as a nice protective sleeve to keep the device from getting scratched and beat up. Finally I want to see ebooks offered on Itunes. They already have audio books why not take the next logical step and add ebooks as well.

September 17 2009 at 4:33 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John Luma

Now if Apple could only make their tablet also work as an e-reader, they would sell even more. If storage and handling ereader functions are no problem, this might make it even more viable.

August 06 2009 at 10:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Pasnbyu

To quote "About Last Night": Give it to me now for the love of Christ!

August 05 2009 at 5:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
coppercore7

That is awesome and really making an iTablet all the more likely, especially after seeing this concept below. Its definitely looking to be on its way!

http://bluemintstudios.com/concepts/mactouch.htm

August 05 2009 at 2:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
AK

This product will likely use the iPhone OS - and share all of the functionality of other devices on that platform. This includes communications, multi-media, and applications.

The differentiation will be:
1. Larger screen
2. Support for books/magazines via iTunes in color
3. Always on high speed internet from Verizon
4. HDTV - over the air
5. Replacement/companion to AppleTV. Watch on the device, or use video output to a larger screen. Sync with your media library, or stream over your local network.
6. Video conferencing over iChat or Skype with a front facing camera. This would include voice calls over the internet.

For this to work, the software will have to wow the market, more so than the hardware.

August 05 2009 at 12:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sam

iPhone OS on a tablet would be the most retarded thing ever. Who would want that? Seriously.

I won't say that it will cause the tablet to fail, because there are lots of people willing to drink the kool-aid, but I will say it will cause it to suck. There's not way I'd give Apple that much control over my phone let alone an actual computer.

No thanks.

August 05 2009 at 10:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
rjflyn@yahoo.com

I want something as a bedside healthcare provider I can carry in to a room, use with gloves on if need be. The touch screen needs to work with anything, be it a finger, a stylus, a pencil eraser or tip of pen-no ink of course. Our options now are laptops or tablets that are just way to heavy. No one uses them. Maybe Jobs saw something when he was getting his liver transplant and got some ideas.

August 05 2009 at 10:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Galley

I would like a tablet with a 9.7" screen that runs iPhone apps, and acts as a kick-ass iTunes controller and portable Apple TV.

August 05 2009 at 9:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
stewart

Many readers seem to want an Apple "Eierlegende Voll-milch Sau", a German word mean egg-laying, wool- and milk-providing pig". It's the unrealistic wish to have everything in one object.

If you have an iPhone or iPod Touch you accept its rather limited data entry capabilities because of its pocketability. But on a non-pocketable device? Not! You certainly won't be thumbing much on a large screen. But touch-typing on a large screen? That's kind of broken, too. Why wouldn't you just use an Apple bluetooth keyboard? Oh wait, Apple doesn't believe in those, having crippled the iPhone and Touch so that you can't use the Apple keyboard with your Apple device.

But if you're going to use an external keyboard with the tablet, you might as well just buy a MacBook Air. So what's the use case for the tablet?

The only market I see for this putative device is as a reader that's sexier than any other on the market, with the added benefit of being able to run the occasional App Store app. For this it will need very long battery life.

August 05 2009 at 9:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sharris

I think the Apple is thinking in three computing categories:

1: Personal always on portable - iPhone
2: Personal computer - iTablet
3: Powerhouse - Mac

The iPhone is your life in you pocket, docking to your mac or iTablet

I think the tablet will take over as the 'computer for the rest of us' for things such as browsing the web, checking facebook, iChat, iPhoto, iMovie, Ganes, etc. The stuff that we do at home for play, & life in general.

The mac will carry on as it has done, doing everything, but also proper work, like writing documents, Photoshop, etc

The tablet could work alone, which it what apple is expecting for most users. This is how they will take back the personal computer market - we don't need all the work stuff at home, leave that for work with the mac. The iPhone syncs to the tablet. also providing 3G.

If you are lucky enough to have a mac at home, the tablet would be able to access it's resources to further the power of the tablet. You would have access to it's storage & processing power, but so tightly integrated the average user wouldn't even realise the files were stored outside the tablet. This is why snow leopard is able to wake up for network requests on a wireless network - so the tablet can access it's resourses even when it's asleep. ("With Snow Leopard and a compatible AirPort Extreme or Time Capsule base station, however, your computer can go to sleep yet continue to share its files with other computers and devices, waking when you need it and sleeping when you don’t." - www.apple.com/macosx/refinements)

The tablet would run iPhone OS, but with much more of the underlying power of Mac OS X exposed to developers.

I hope so anyway!

August 05 2009 at 8:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.