Skip to Content

Secret source gives iLounge some Apple tablet rumor love

Those of us in the Mac rumor and news business (is there a difference?) love it when we get a good tip, especially when that tip is from someone who has given us good, solid info in the past. iLounge featured a post last night called "Ten New Details on the Apple Tablet" that passed along some rumors that they've received from one of those solid sources.

While I won't parrot back the bullet list of ten details that are in the iLounge post, here's the gist of the article: Apple has created at least three prototypes of what editor-in-chief Jeremy Horwitz calls the iPad. The prototype that is still in the running has a 10.7" diagonal display, runs iPhone OS, and looks like a large iPhone 3G.

The device will have two variations, one with 3G networking built-in (think of it as an über-iPhone 3GS) and another without it (a mongo iPod touch). The larger display is expected to have about 7 times the surface area of the iPhone, and about 6 times the resolution, allowing easy reading of books, magazines, and cropped newspapers.

With the extra screen space, the new devices are designed to bring ebook functionality to the iPhone platform as well as make a more compelling platform for games, media, app, and the web. Apple doesn't expect this device to compete with netbooks, hence their continued denial that the company will come out with a netbook killer. Instead, this will be an extension of the iPhone platform.

Horwitz finishes his list by noting that the device is still awaiting a green light from Steve Jobs, and that it has about an 80% chance of making it to market. If it's given the go-ahead, the source is stating that the device would be announced on or before January 19, 2010 and would go on sale in May or June.

While this is still a rumor, the information is from the same source that gave iLounge the scoop on the iPod nano 5G, the iPhone 3GS, and the Chinese iPhone 3G. It appears we'll still have to wait until 2010 before the fabled tablet appears in our local Apple Stores.

Those of us in the Mac rumor and news business (is there a difference?) love it when we get a good tip, especially when that tip is from...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

18 Comments

Filter by:
ianlive

If it does surface, I will rip out every trace of audio components in my car and mount one front and centre. Can you imagine how much better it would be to have a ten inch flat panel computer running OSX (any flavour) in your car for GPS, Internet, iTunes etc than many of the nav systems out there today?

I'm giddy at the thought.

September 30 2009 at 9:31 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David Frantz

I'm not sure why there is such negativity with respect to iPhone OS. Consider the following:

1.
Mac OS/X apps are not written for Touch. That should be the end of the discussion.
2.
Using iPhone OS does not imply the same old apps that are on iPhone. Ideally iPhone apps would be compatible in some manner, but by definition this is a larger device and thus will have capabilities beyound iPhone.
3.
App store is a fantastic way to distribute apps and keep your self up to date. In some ways app installer leaves you with the functionality of a Linux package manager withou all the negatives. There is nothing better than being able to update your machine no matter where you are. The one shopping stop makes for great convience.
4.
To be truly useful the tablet will need apps written for it. Being iPhone compatible just means there are useful apps for the device right at the time it is released. Quality Touch apps will take awhile to fully exploit the new features so starting off with iPhone apps is a good idea.
5.
IPhone apps imply ARM processor. This is a good thing. It means long runtimes and lots performance. Given stacked chips this makes for a thin high performancen device with

September 29 2009 at 10:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Estevan

I believe all these comments are true. I remembered when iLounge was talking about both the Nano 5G and the 3GS and was on point. I jus hope the "iPad" (what an ugly name, iTablet WAY better) will be more like a 13 inch rather than a 10.5in. But then again, ppl will prob not buy the MacBook 13" if that was the case.

September 29 2009 at 8:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
timejumperone

Sorry about that previous post, my 1Password + Firefox does an automatic return with an old post reply.

What I meant to say was: what if the iTablet had the performance specs of a Mac-mini with touch screen and a few I/O pots, would that interest users?

September 29 2009 at 2:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
timejumperone

Doesn't Apple's fiscal year end in September? If so, wouldn't having all those Amazon.com pre-orders filled be better for Apple's bottom line?

September 29 2009 at 2:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
BigB

I really don't see how a tablet fits into todays market, even with the App store.

its not that easy to use one, even if it was just a larger iphone. bigger means harder to hold with ne hand and type on.

I dunno, Apples created markets where crap existed before, but I just dont see the point, nor why everyone thinks they'd buy a tablet.

September 29 2009 at 2:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TonyRockyHorror

If it ships as described above, I'm on board with Microsoft's "Courier" project. I love my iPhone, but I don't need or want all the same apps I have now, only on a bigger screen.

September 29 2009 at 1:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Drifter71

Does anybody wonder what this would do to AT&T's Data network? From everything I have read, they can't keep up with the iPhones' data. If that's true, how can they add another device like this on 3G and expect to keep up?

September 29 2009 at 12:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Adnium

This device really, really needs to run OS X proper, rather than an upscaled version of the iPhone OS. Otherwise, what's the point? I already have an iPhone, whose small form factor lends it to the more wideget-esque applications you can get for it now.

If people are going to seriously consider spending ~£500 on something which is semi-portable, it had better encapsualte the desktop Mac experience in a way which makes it more productive and useful than the iPhone.

September 29 2009 at 12:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Hank Cazorp

A key point for me is whether this will be yet another device that needs to sync with iTunes. If I have to sit around interminably updating firmware, transferring huge applications back and forth...a process that already annoys the hell out of me on my iPhone - then no sale, brother. No sale.

September 29 2009 at 12:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.