Skip to Content

iTunes LP broken for indie record labels?

Update: ElectricPig is reporting on 10/13 that an Apple spokesperson said the LP format will be opened up for all, indies and majors alike.

There's word from an indie record-label that iTunes LPs are not for the indies. Introduced at Apple's "It's Only Rock and Roll" event in September, the iTunes LP format adds "bigger than a matchbook" album art, song lyrics, video clips, and other extra content to albums sold through the iTunes store.

Brian McKinney of Chicago-based label Chocolate Lab Records saw some promise in the new format and started looking into the idea of producing for iTunes LPs himself. But the truly small labels may have a hard time getting in. McKinney spoke to the digital distribution manager at his label's distributor, who reportedly told him that Apple charges a $10,000 production fee for iTunes LPs. $10,000 may be less than the heads of Warner Music Group, Sony BMG, Universal Music Group, and EMI spend on breakfast, but could be cost prohibitive for the little label that could (if it had $10,000 handy for each of its acts).

It's not just the cost that prohibits the little labels. According to McKinney, it's also Apple. McKinney says his dude in distribution was told "that LPs aren't being offered to indies and that there are only about 12 LPs being offered right now."

"Foul, foul, filth and foul," cries Cult of Mac's Pete Mortensen. Like a financial analyst moving a stock from "buy" to "sell," Mortensen says iTunes LP has gone from "the first digital album good enough to criticize," to "the first major content misstep in the history of the iTunes Store." Assuming that Chocolate Lab's distributor info is on the up-and-up, Mortensen thinks iTunes LP is "less a new format for music than it is a new form of paid advertising on the iTunes store."
While it may be romantic to think that iTunes was turning into the record store of old, isn't it also unrealistic? Apple wants its customers to "think different," but may not always want to do so itself. The Cupertino-company's relationships with the big four record labels has gone from antagonistic to swell to antagonistic to swell to... well you get the idea. It's not indies that have bemoaned the death of the LP... Perhaps they have, but they have not been as loud about it as major labels or acts such as Radiohead or Smashing Pumpkins. Variable pricing for tracks in the iTunes Store (announced at Macworld 2009) was one concession to the big four. It's possible that keeping iTunes LP for the majors only (for now anyway) was another.

Still, all hope is not lost for the indies. Apple may make the iTunes LP format more accessible down the road (assuming the format lasts long enough to get down the road). In the meantime, if indies want to capture some of the iTunes LP experience, there could be an app for that. They just have to build it or have it built. AppleInsider's Prince McLean suggests the idea, noting that "any artist can build a custom app delivering whatever artistically interesting content they can imagine into existence," meaning bringing album art, song lyrics, video clips, and other extra content is something the indies might be able to do, or might be able to hire someone to do.

There may even be advantages to hitting the App Store instead of the iTunes LP for the indies. Right now, extra content for iTunes LPs is married to the desktop or laptop. Buyers can take tracks with them on their iThings, but the lyrics, video clips, and so on stay on the computer. Where iTunes LP can go may change with the introduction of Apple's fabled tablet or an Apple TV update, but that remains to be seen. Additionally, iTunes LPs are pretty passive. Sure there's a lot of content, but - once it's released - it is what it is. No uploading new content. No adding new features. No interacting with fans. The iTunes LP is a digital package set in stone (unless they are sold as part of an iTunes Pass).

On the flip-side, iTunes LPs would be great for indies today since there are still under 20 iTunes LPs available. With a quick production turn around, the local bar-band could share a pretty exclusive space with Pearl Jam (iTunes link), Dave Matthews Band (iTunes link), and The Doors (iTunes link). Compare that to the 85,000-plus applications in the App Store and the attraction of an iTunes LP likely rises.

There are many ways that this could be much ado about nothing. It's possible that what Chocolate Lab heard was not Apple's official policy. It's possible that it is official policy but that it'll change relatively soon. It's possible that the big four record labels will drag their heels, overcharge, and kill the format in its infancy. It's possible that people won't warm up to iTunes LP as a format. For now, though, word of barred access for the indies has some in a spin.

[via Gizmodo, Cult of Mac, Apple Insider]

Categories

iTunes Music

Update: ElectricPig is reporting on 10/13 that an Apple spokesperson said the LP format will be opened up for all, indies and majors...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

23 Comments

Filter by:
Doug

These things are not rocket science to build. They can be created by the little guys... Just check out the Tuesday Spoils iTunes LP that is floating around for an example of a good looking LP done on the cheap.

October 13 2009 at 5:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Trevor

Read a short Q&A with Brian McKinney @

http://www.aemmp.org/site/2009/10/12/itunes-lp-vs-chocolate-lab-records-q-a-with-brian-mckinney/

October 12 2009 at 2:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
McKinney

This is a great post and I learned a lot from this.

It's true - I'm only going on what I was told by my distribution company based on what they were told by their Apple reps. I never claimed anything different. They may decide to open it up to everyone for $1 tomorrow but that's not the information I was given.

And I'd like to go on record as a huge fan of Apple and iTunes. I bought the original iPod (5 gig brick) when it first came out (2001?) and I loved playing Oregon Trail on my Applpe IIe. That said, my point was that Apple won't let us sell our own in-housed developed LPs (Juan's s LP is an awesome example - just tried it!) but rather would charge us $10,000 to build it themselves... if we were Sony or EMI.

So, that's my stance right now. Open it up - you don't police audio content, so don't police LP content.

October 11 2009 at 8:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
debt relief counseling

Was there a real point to this

October 11 2009 at 7:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
henk duivendrecht

$10.000 for allowing a user to view a JPG and some lyrics? Am I missing something here?

October 11 2009 at 5:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
frank.lowney

If you've used iWeb or, better, RapidWeaver to create web pages, you already know that very sophisticated coding can be done without much, if any, expertise in HTML, CSS, Javascript and so on. Content expertise and a RapidWeaver template are sufficient.

That being the case, it is not a stretch to imagine templates that sell for $15-30 being available to create iTunes LP and iTunes Extra files quickly, easily and inexpensively. That handles the cost/expertise barrier.

What I don't have much knowledge about is what happens next. How do you get Apple to accept and publish an .itlp file? They are the gate keepers of iTunes so what if they simply say, "no, we don't have the time to review your LP file so forget about it."

In other words, is there a case of someone not with a major label who has gotten Apple to publish their home-grown LP file along with an album full of music? This would be the acid test I think.

October 11 2009 at 5:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to frank.lowney's comment
Chris Korhonen

@frank.lowney:

The thing is, Apple are only the gatekeepers if you want to distribute your iTLP file through the store with DRM.

There is nothing to stop you distributing homebrew LP's through whatever channels to your users - this could be as a straight up download, or via. your own digital payment/delivery service. You just open them in iTunes and enjoy the LP functionality.

The question remains - will Apple take steps to prevent this, especially if companies begin to use this as a means to distributing digital content.

October 11 2009 at 7:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MAXX POWER

It' Business Basics 101. You sometimes launch new products/services at a high price to manage demand. Apple produces the content for now. How many people do they have working on that? A dozen? two dozen? At $1k they would be flooded with demand and not keep up. Apple probably doesn't want to hire a small army of designers/producers for a new service they plan to open to third party developers/producers in the short term. So what do you do? Price it high, keep demand low, basically a public beta. If it's successful it will trickle down.

October 11 2009 at 5:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jonathan

To be fair, the iTunes LP format is sufficiently complex that should someone want to produce one, even my company would charge around $10k for it. There's visual design iterations, direction, assets creation, and code to consider. The one for Muse's new album was pretty technically advanced for HTML/CSS/JS.

Saying you could do the same for $1k is disingenuous at best. You could MAYBE find a freelancer to produce something for that kind of money, but it'd be rushed and probably suck.

October 11 2009 at 4:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
usingpond

Ugh, this is so dumb. Are they trying to position it as some really expensive service? You'd charge maybe $1000 for someone to do this on a web site (which is essentially all it is). Or just in-house for free.

There's gotta be some stupid division of iTunes run by industry people who just don't get it -- the very idea of cost-prohibitiveness is antithetical to publishing content to anything run by Apple.

Xcode for example is FREE, which is relatively unique for a large software company to do. This doesn't need any crazy API or IDE or whatever, it's completely open and the only question here is "who should we allow to publish this?"

October 11 2009 at 4:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nate MC

iTunes has always been rather hostile to indies. I approached them years ago about getting the 5 bands I have distro rights for on the store, they told me I was not big enough for them to allow me into the store and that they would not be offering their services to us.

I had to wait 2 more years before TuneCore opened up the iTunes store to everyone.

Apple really doesn't care about indie music. They want you to go through a middle man. Which defeats one of the reasons to go digital.

October 11 2009 at 4:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.