Skip to Content

UPDATE: AT&T "unimpressed" with "irresponsible" Operation Chokehold

I posted earlier today about Fake Steve Jobs' Operation Chokehold.

Well, AT&T has just told Cult of Mac they're not impressed:

"We understand that fakesteve.net is primarily a satirical forum, but there is nothing amusing about advocating that customers attempt to deliberately degrade service on a network that provides critical communications services for more than 80 million customers. We know that the vast majority of customers will see this action for what it is: an irresponsible and pointless scheme to draw attention to a blog."

So, the battle lines are drawn. Where do you stand?


Categories

iPhone

I posted earlier today about Fake Steve Jobs' Operation Chokehold. Well, AT&T has just told Cult of Mac they're not impressed: "We...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

61 Comments

Filter by:
J 2.0

Umm...I work for at&t and am amazed at how this company expects to keep treating both, their employees and their customers, like crap and think that both will keep their mouths shut and take the abuse. If you guys look up where all the big wigs are located for this company you will see that they are mostly in the northeastern states, exactly where the old AT&T Long Distance big wigs were located. They are trying to turn this company into the old AT&T, and we all know what the heck happened to that joke of a company. We all know that the only way that these big corporations listen is when people stand up and protest and their ugly mugs get plastered all over the media.

As far as emergency services getting disrupted and the different communications "experts" and "engineers" that are all over the blogs and the media stating that this is a possibility, I got news for ya....bullshit! I actually work with these services and even IF this protest were to affect the voice network (which it will NOT, only data), emergency calls are designed to complete and never fail. Even when the regular network is isolated, it is very rare that emergency calls fail.

So to all my "chokeholders", I say RIGHT ON! Kick at&t in the media nards!

December 18 2009 at 3:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Panolo

This constant juvenile ridicule of AT&T is getting old. AT&T's service is just not that bad compared to other carriers. And that depends on where you live and work. On three occasions My wife and I have had problems with excessive dropped calls. A trip to the Genius got us brand new replacement iPhones, a smile and a "thank you" for doing business with Apple. None of the problems were with AT&T.

The next time you have a problem with constant call interruptions do yourself a favor, let Apple pull the logs on your phone and they will tell you where the problem is.

December 16 2009 at 11:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jamie Jo Vittetoe

So this whole thing started because AT&T mentioned it might start charging people for what they actually use...that only seems fair. It seems to have blown out of proportion.

December 16 2009 at 5:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jamie Jo Vittetoe's comment
beenyweenies

You're obviously not an AT&T Wireless customer. With the iPhone, you are required to purchase the "unlimited data" plan for an extra $30/month. See that word "unlimited?" See that price tag? Here's what their own site says:

"Data Plan for iPhone includes unlimited data in the U.S."
"An eligible data plan for iPhone is required."

Get the facts before weighing in, thanks

December 17 2009 at 1:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
BMOC

WE GOTTA NUKE EM! WE GOTTA NUKE EM NOW! KILL KILL KILL

December 16 2009 at 4:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
exnewt

Two words:

douche

bags

December 16 2009 at 4:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Schmedely

I'm an engineer by trade, and manage a global ip network that's not AT&T...
Intentionally taking down or attempting to take down a network is irresponsible and downright criminal. My iphone will be powered off that day.

December 16 2009 at 12:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Frank Patrick

Unconvincing and irresponsible.

December 16 2009 at 12:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
takamaru

As was stated in the other post, if they change from "unlimited" to "limited" you can get out of your contract penalty free because they changed the terms of the contract.

December 16 2009 at 10:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jbrown510

How do you ever leave the house with paranoid fear and worry like that?

Fakesteve's suggestion is to engauge in protest for the PURPOSE of gaining attention to highlight an issue. It's really no different that am airline strike, blue flu, chaining oneself to a tree or blocking the entrance to a university... Sure it COULD and in many cases is gaurunteed to negatively effect people... That's the point, but people are expected to take that into account and adjust acordingly. We live in an amazingly resilent world where even when your cell phone doesn't work there are a dozen other ways to get help... You know on e upon a time there weren't just no cell phones, but no phones either... Amazingly people spontaneously combisting was just about as frequent then as it is now.

December 16 2009 at 10:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Scott Lembcke

Honestly, the real problem is that internet providers keep insisting that you have "unlimited data". How can they possibly promise infinite usage when bandwidth is finite! It's ridiculous. It's just marketing bull. You cannot promise no limits and then get mad when people are using too much.

Comcast, AT&T, etc should simply be honest about limits because they really do exist. If everybody could get gas for a monthly fee, nobody would be driving hybrids. That's for damn sure. I don't understand why Americans believe that we should be able to get infinite resources just because we pay a monthly fee.

December 16 2009 at 10:28 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Scott Lembcke's comment
colouroflight

I don't understand why companies can falsely advertise services as "unlimited" when they are not.

December 16 2009 at 11:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
BMOC

ya but bandwidth isnt a natural resource that will eventually deplete, its only a matter of how many machines you have to process the data and how fast it can be delivered...

December 16 2009 at 4:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.