Skip to Content

US Government: iPad and other smart mobile devices may strain networks

Soon the iPad will be upon us, and the US government is worried about the congestion it will cause.

Phil Bellaria is a staffer in the Obama administration. Specifically, he's the director of scenario planning for the federal government's Omnibus Broadband Initiative. He published a blog post earlier this week describing his initial concerns about the future demands on our networks.
"With the iPad pointing to even greater demand for mobile broadband on the horizon, we must ensure that network congestion doesn't choke off a service that consumers clearly find so appealing or frustrate mobile broadband's ability to keep us competitive in the global broadband economy. "
He refers to the network-crippling outages that occurred when Aol* first introduced unlimited Internet access in 1996. For months customers could scarcely connect, and even when they finally did those connections were fragile due to the huge numbers of people trying to get on at once.

Just as Aol remedied the situation in the 90's with network upgrades, Mr. Bellaria explains, current Wi-Fi and 3G providers must prepare for the onslaught that iPad mania will bring. In the recent iPad press event, Scott Forstall mentioned the network upgrades that AT&T is currently working on. Hurry up, AT&T! The clock is ticking!

[Via International Business Times]

Is the US government's iPad concern
Warranted -- the iPad will exacerbate the burden that the iPhone has handed AT&T1755 (37.1%)
Likely -- the iPad will just tax existing infrastructure but AT&T will be ready441 (9.3%)
Speculative -- who knows? Without a camera, it's just a big iPod712 (15.0%)
Uncalled for -- government should stop over-regulating everything. Let consumer courts take care of any complaints1278 (27.0%)
Enough with the politics, this is an Apple blog549 (11.6%)

*Full disclosure: Aol is our parent company.

Soon the iPad will be upon us, and the US government is worried about the congestion it will cause. Phil Bellaria is a staffer in the...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

29 Comments

Filter by:
Tony

When traffic/flow is heavy use an iMaxiPad.

February 04 2010 at 1:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Andy

I blieve in AT&T, the fastest 3G provider and most reliable network in United States of America. Lol

February 04 2010 at 10:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
deluded spider

How about our government shuts the hell up and gives us the kind of internet speeds you can find overseas?

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/Images/commentarynews/broadbandspeedchart.jpg

And yes, I know the U.S. is a much, much, much larger area than Japan, but I'm sure something can be done to raise our average speed a bit. (For one, get rid of dial-up, as I'm sure that's what's dragging our average down on charts like this.)

We don't need to match Japan's crazy (awesome) average speed, but it'd be nice to bump our speed up a bit more as the internet becomes even more pervasive.

February 04 2010 at 9:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Robert

Working in the telecoms industry (at a vendor), it constantly amazes me how backwards the USA is in mobile technologies. In the rest of the world (Europe, Asia and even lowly Australia and New Zealand) the carriers (some better than others granted) have managed to rapidly grow and adapt their mobile networks to extreme growth in data. In fact, they actively encourage it. In Australia there has been a mobile data price war for the past year and the fixed network (DSL and Cable) price war has been almost totally abandoned. 5 Gigabytes per month on HSPA+ (7.2Mbps) is only $19 AUD a month! A minimal DSL plan still costs at least $59 for similar quota (incl line rental).

Where there is a market (mobile devices and data) the providers will step up to the mark - it seems that disparity in technology platform (EV-DO vs UMTS) in the USA and the previously slow uptake of services such as SMS/MMS has partially damaged the natural market competition for subscribers and data growth (carriers are still competing on coverage rather than services).

So - in summary, the government shouldn't need to get involved, maybe they should open the door to Vodafone to come and teach AT+T a lesson :)

February 04 2010 at 5:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rudy

at an entry level price of $630 i dont think enough people will even have a 3G iPad to congest any network lol

February 04 2010 at 1:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jal

Well, I guess it drives page views.

Maybe not everyone remembers the AOL onslaught, but I do. The network problems were a pretty minor thing, as these things go. Some network operators were caught unaware, but stepped up to handle it relatively quickly. This led to the huge amounts of "dark fiber" that was installed, a lot of which is still turned off. There's a lot of capacity still to tap, waiting for people to pay money to use it.

Now, it is true that ATT seems remarkably shortsighted about infrastructure investment, and I wonder about why, exactly, Apple wants to be tied to them in their largest market. I assume there's a reason for it - Jobs isn't exactly shy about his demands on partners.

February 04 2010 at 1:08 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Khalil

The responsibility falls on the providers, not the government, to deal with potential issues on bandwidth and connectivity. It seems that AT&T will have to bear most of the burden here so they need to work on strengthening their network, simple as that. This is just one more aspect of the nanny state trying to get a stronger hold, more power, over the people it claims to serve.

February 04 2010 at 12:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jake

Um, how and why is the Government involved with this? Let's let the service providers take care of it. Just another example of the Government trying to scare us into thinking we need them to intervene.

February 04 2010 at 12:00 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Robert

The broadband speed and capacity in the US is already lagging behind by international standard. The solution is to beef up the network, NOT restricting usage.

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/broadband_speeds_around_the_world.php

February 03 2010 at 10:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Carl

I work at a large highschool. We had a network with about 400 computers and the network was fine. Now nearly every student has an internet connected device and I don't think it's an underestimation to say we now have 1,600 devices on our network. (we have 2,300 students). Our network now crawls. Thankfully there can be guest restrictions, and MAC address filtering on our IT side to help, but still it is pathetic that my slow DSL connection works better than the school's T1.

February 03 2010 at 10:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Carl's comment
Carl

This was just a microcosm, but it's what we can expect to be commonplace at the end of the decade.

February 03 2010 at 10:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
directeco

Off topic but you had 400 computers accessing the internet over a single T1 line? That's 1.5Mbps, shit that isn't enough for the computers in just a school library.

February 03 2010 at 11:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.