Apple pressuring music publishers over Amazon Daily Deal
Amazon has used low-priced, exclusive "Daily Deals" to promote its MP3 store successfully, and Apple's not happy about it. In fact, the iTunes team is trying to talk publishers out of participating.According to Billboard, participating labels entered into the program with Amazon in 2008 without paying a thing. It was simply meant to increase the store's publicity. Two years later, that's changed. An unnamed major-label head of sales told Billboard that "[the] promotion morphed into something where the labels make arrangements to provide an exclusive selling window with Amazon for a big release expected to do a lot of business on street date [the day the new release is available for general retail sales]."
Two years in, the labels are motivated to offer Amazon first dibs on major releases at a significant discount, and that's gotten Apple's attention. Billboard's sources suggest that iTunes executives are trying to persuade labels to stop offering Amazon these exclusives, and have even gone so far as to pull their own promotions for those releases.
In response, Billboard reports, certain label executives recently opted out of Daily Deal promotions for such big names as Corinne Bailey Rae, Lady Antebellum and Ke$ha (Sony Music Entertainment denies considering a Daily Deal promotion for Ke$ha's "Animal"). Additionally, Amazon is said to be altering the deal to not require exclusivity, but Apple's still unsatisfied.
Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to sell digital music.
[Via AppleInsider]
Share
Categories
Amazon has used low-priced, exclusive "Daily Deals" to promote its MP3 store successfully, and Apple's not happy about it. In fact, the...
Add a Comment
Glad to see you read MacRumors too Dave. I see you took the time to change one word in their headline from yesterday, but when I loaded up TUAW this afternoon, I thought I was looking at a cached version of a webpage. Then I realized I'd read this story on MacRumors YESTERDAY, as you and AppleInsider must have too.
Maybe you should all just link back to the Billboard article that's the actual source of this story instead of just link-link-linking to each other.
Does anybody ever wonder, "hey, is this good for the artists?"
March 04 2010 at 2:09 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI find this to be much more scuzzy of Apple than the whole patent lawsuit against HTC. Sometimes I have to take a step back from my beautifully functional Apple hardware and remember that they are still a gargantuan corporate machine.
March 04 2010 at 2:04 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replydo we finally have a successor to Microsoft, the old industry bully?
March 04 2010 at 1:23 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyTo be honest most of the music Amazon promotes like this is manufactured garbage anyway. It probably gives the record companies an opportunity to bump up sales, which therefore gives them an unfair way of manipulating the charts and extra air play for promoting their latest artist. Lets face it music executives don't care about you or I they're just in it for the money. Which ever way this goes you can guarantee it wont be in the favour of consumers.
March 04 2010 at 1:10 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI love when apple feels the need to trump the competition.
But only when they do it thru a superior product. This is just lazy.
I agree. Why doesn't Apple offer the same deal? The article states that Amazon will not want exclusivity, so why take a great deal away from consumers? Remember us Apple? We buy your products!
March 04 2010 at 7:13 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI'm sorry but sometimes it's just that the publishers are acting like the music industry, apple had to push them to go with the 99 cents per song, now we are doing the same with publishers.
March 04 2010 at 12:47 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplySometimes Apple acts like a communist country.
March 04 2010 at 12:42 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyAnti-competitive practices.
March 04 2010 at 12:41 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyyeah. by Amazon. Not Apple.
The issue here is really about dates. Labels for ages have pushed this 'street date' game so that everyone was on a level playing field. No one could corner early sales by having something first. Etc.
Then Amazon pulls this 'give us time to be the only seller before everyone else' move. Before other digitals AND brick and mortar. So Amazon has an advantage over everyone else. Not Fair. Even without requiring the exclusive date, Amazon is likely still encouraging it, offer huge banners etc
Apple is basically asking for equal treatment. Don't even make the date issue an option. If there's a street date, there's a street date. For everyone. Otherwise they aren't going to give up their valuable marketing space to someone that has it covered via Amazon. They will play fair and let someone else who needs it more have that spot. It's up to the labels.
Hot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Refurb Apple MacBook Air Laptops: 12" 64GB SSD for $699 + free shipping
- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- miFrame Picture Frame Dock for iPad for $64 + $8 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
- Hannspree Apple-Shaped 28" 1080p LCD HDTV for $270 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



11 Comments