The #1 thing I want in the next iPhone: support for 900 MHz UMTS/HSDPA
The next iPhone is widely expected to debut sometime in the next few months, most likely at WWDC, which is rumored to kick off on June 28. Even though that's only a hair over three months away, so far there's been very little revealed about the next iteration of the iPhone either in terms of its appearance or likely features.Apple can put a better camera in it, add more capacity, a better processor, a front-facing camera for videoconferencing, and a dozen other things -- but quite honestly, I'd be perfectly happy if none of that made it into the next-gen iPhone so long as one feature does find its way in: support for 900 MHz UMTS/HSDPA.
The iPhone 3G and 3GS, as well as the forthcoming iPad, all contain 3G antenna/chipsets that support UMTS/HSDPA at 850, 1900, and 2100 MHz. UMTS/HSDPA is an alphabet-soup way of referring to the GSM flavors of 3G. In other words, high-speed broadband works at those frequencies, and only those frequencies. If high-speed broadband isn't available at those frequencies, the iPhone will fall back to GSM/EDGE at 850, 900, 1800, or 1900 MHz.
For those of you living in the US and on AT&T, the iPhone's 3G frequency range is especially tailored for your use. Most of AT&T's 3G network runs on 850 MHz, while T-Mobile runs at 1700 MHz -- this is why the iPhone only works at EDGE speeds with T-Mobile, because the iPhone's 3G chipset isn't tailored for the 1700 MHz band.
3G networks in many other areas of the world, including portions of Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand function at 900 MHz. This creates several problems for users in those regions; read on to find out why.
I can't speak for those other countries, but here in New Zealand, there's only one wireless provider selling the iPhone at a subsidized price: Vodafone. Vodafone's 3G network runs at two frequencies: 2100 MHz in metropolitan areas, and 900 MHz for "extended" 3G everywhere else. The result for NZ iPhone users on Vodafone's network: 3G service is only available in major cities, often only in the downtown areas. Here in Palmerston North, 3G service is centered on the central business district and Massey University. Places outside of those areas, even my house barely 2 kilometers away from downtown, have sporadic access to 3G, if any at all.
Outside of the areas serviced with 2100 MHz 3G, Vodafone transmits in the 900 MHz band -- but since there's no such thing as EDGE here, the iPhone is restricted to GPRS on the 900 MHz band, which means excruciatingly slow speeds akin to wireless 56k dialup anywhere outside the major cities. It's almost not even worth using the iPhone at GPRS speeds, because even simple web pages can take several minutes to open, if they open at all before MobileSafari says the page has timed out.
New Zealand's other major telecommunications provider, Telecom, has a network that's arguably better-suited to the iPhone. Like AT&T in the States, Telecom's XT network transmits "extended" 3G wireless at 850 MHz, which is fully compatible with the iPhone's 3G chipset. So outside the major cities, in areas where the iPhone would be choked to GPRS speeds on Vodafone's network, iPhones on Telecom are capable of surfing at 3G speeds. It's slower than it would be on the 2100 MHz networks in the cities, but it's still far better than plodding along on GPRS.
The problem is that even though Telecom's network is a better fit for the iPhone's current 3G chipset, Telecom doesn't sell the iPhone, nor do they have any specific plans tailored to it. If you want to use the iPhone on Telecom's network, you have to buy one outright from either Vodafone or Apple, at a cost of up to NZ$1379 for a 32 GB iPhone 3GS, or nearly US$975. Then you have to piece together a plan from Telecom's various offerings rather than a one-stop solution like what Vodafone offers, which seems like a huge pain to me. Plus, to get things like MMS and tethering working properly on Telecom's XT network, you have to go out of your way to download special carrier files. While it's easy to download and install these carrier files, it's far from the "it just works" solution touted by Apple.
There's two ways this situation could be relieved, at least in New Zealand: either Apple could offer the iPhone through Telecom, officially, or it could expand the wireless capabilities of its 3G chipset to support 900 MHz UMTS/HSDPA. I prefer the latter option, because expanding the number of 3G frequencies the iPhone supports would make it compatible with far more of the world's wireless networks. As it stands now, two of the iPhone's three UMTS/HSDPA frequencies only enjoy wide support in the Western Hemisphere. While the 2100 MHz band operates virtually everywhere in the Eastern Hemisphere, it usually only covers metropolitan areas. Adding support for 900 MHz UMTS/HSDPA would mean vastly expanded coverage for the iPhone in Europe, Asia, and Oceania; in other words, most of the rest of the world besides North America.
Is this terribly likely to happen? No. One of the things I was watching very closely leading up to the iPad launch was what 3G frequencies the device would support. When the iPad's frequency bands turned out to be identical to the iPhone, I uttered a few choice words that I won't repeat here, because it makes it all but certain that the next-gen iPhone's UMTS/HSDPA will continue to operate at 850/1900/2100 MHz, severely curtailing its utility for much of the world. But Apple has surprised us before, and it's not impossible that it may do so again -- at the very least, they could offer multiple versions of the iPhone with 3G chipsets tailored to different regions' frequencies.
Share
Categories
The next iPhone is widely expected to debut sometime in the next few months, most likely at WWDC, which is rumored to kick off on June 28....
Add a Comment
What about Visual Voicemail for iPhone in NZ?
I still can't believe vodaphoney doesn't offer this basic ground-breaking service that US and Australian customers have received for awhile now.
That's just plain lazy.
For those wondering why it's not in silicon - it is! The iPhone is using Infineon's S-GOLD3H for its telecom stack, which uses Infineon's SMARTi 3GE transceiver - a *six-band* W-CDMA transceiver (many smartphones are using similar transceivers) - the capability is already in the silicon, just not enabled in the firmware and in the antenna design.
It'd be nice to have an 850/900/1700/1900/2100 3G world phone, but alas, I just don't see it coming (the SMARTi chips were released all the way back in 2006).
Sorry for being a nitpick, but the facts in this article are wrong
AT&T operates it's UMTS (3G) network in 2100MHz mode (both uplink/downlink).
T-Mobile operates it's UMTS network in both 2100MHz (downlink) and 1700MHz (uplink).
That's why, when you realize the G1 you bought is better used as a doorstop and buy an jailbroken Ebay-iPhone, that you have to turn off 3G. Reason being is that the phone does pick up the fact that there is a 3G network (2100 downlink) but fails on negotiating (because no one is listening on 2100).
Seems like you're just whining about your carrier support to me.
900MHz band support may be the #1 thing you want in the next iPhone, but honestly, 99.99% of the world simply could care less.
Actually, your math is a bit off. 0.01% of the world is about 70 million people. That accounts for all users of the iPhone OS worldwide. I doubt all of them care about 900 MHz support; in fact, to be generous, maybe only 1 in 10 iPhone users does.
So really, it's more like 99.999% of the world couldn't care less about 900 MHz support. But I do, as do many other people. The question is, if you don't care, why did you bother reading/commenting?
Although not all of Europe currently uses 900Mhz 3G, it is allocated for this purpose across the EU - as well as this the UK has just announced that 3G over 900Mhz will be ratified this August.
March 25 2010 at 3:45 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI would pay full price to get a iPhone to work at 3G speeds on Tmobile US. Apple, are you listening?? In fact, I would buy two. Having a subsidy would be great, but I need 3g so I can use voice and data at the same time.
I currently have a rooted G1 and ipod touch. The ipod touch works great with the wifi tether on the G1.
While WCDMA 900 is becoming pretty popular, WCDMA 850 still seems to be more popular. North America, South America, and Oceania (Australia, Philippines, New Zealand) all use the WCDMA 850 band now. I understand that the 900 band should also be included, but it might just be easier for Apple to strike a deal with Telecom NZ, like they did with Telstra in Australia. For those people, they get access to the nextG 850 network in rural Australia.
March 25 2010 at 12:14 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWCDMA 900 is still a rarity. It is being used by just a handful of countries (Australia, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Solvenia, Thailand) and in most cases, 3G signals there are more widespread in alternate WCDMA frequencies.
March 25 2010 at 1:02 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIf you compare how Nokia, Samsung and the others work in the mobile phone market and Apple, you'll see that Apple runs it's business with a very US centric way.
AT&T doesn't like tethering? Ok, let's disable it for everyone. AT&T doesn't do MMS? Ok, let's not have MMS.
If Apple was a real mobile phone vendor, they'd offer the iPhone for all the frequencies used in the market and not play the stupid game with a carrier unlocks and limited availability. Most phones are available in a few variants to support all the frequncies, or even as a single model with everything.
NZ is lucky for having unlocked, non-contract iPhone in the first place. Although NZ was stuck with the CDMA network for quite a while, now you have a 3G network that has better coverage than most 3G networks anywhere in the world (with the rural 900 Mhz 3G).
Tethering and MMS are both available to networks outside of the US, and were day and date with the features being implemented in iPhone OS.
AT&T has MMS now, but they haven't figured out how to scalp iPhone users for tethering yet.
Forget all that, just give me a task program that syncs using exchange/google thank you very much.
I had tasks sync on my Palm Pilot (mono) for pete's sake.
Imagine, for a second, that I am an idiot (pretend you have to try). Why on earth don't they, knowing that around the world different frequencies are supported, simply make one chip that can access all of them? Surely the manufacturing cost increase would be offset by an ability to build one version of the hardware that can be sold anywhere?
March 25 2010 at 11:27 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThere's also battery usage to consider ... all those radios trying to figure out who's on the best network surely burn up a lot of power. Although yes, I believe there are multi-frequency multi-standard chipsets available (even CDMA+GSM). I am sure Apple is aware of the issue, it's a calculated cost/benefit/complexity/potential user base tradeoffs that must have led to the current choice.
March 25 2010 at 11:54 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThey could just use a Quadband UMTS chipset. Some phones have it, and it's entirely possible...
March 25 2010 at 11:10 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Refurb Apple MacBook Air Laptops: 12" 64GB SSD for $699 + free shipping
- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- miFrame Picture Frame Dock for iPad for $64 + $8 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
- Hannspree Apple-Shaped 28" 1080p LCD HDTV for $270 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



19 Comments