Skip to Content

Apple rejects iPad app for pinch-to-expand

We've heard all kinds of reasons for rejected apps on the App Store, but this one seems new to us. An iPad app called Web Albums HD has reportedly been rejected from the App Store for including a pinch-to-expand feature in its Picasa albums viewing functionality, as reported on Apple Insider. The developers allegedly hand-coded a pinch-to-expand feature for their galleries to match Apple's official photo app, but were told by App Store editors that the feature was "associated solely with Apple applications." Interesting. Not actually true, as "pinch-to-expand" is really a feature that's common to many touchscreen interfaces, even if this photo gallery-browsing instance is unique. But apparently Apple feels it has laid claim, and so no other apps on the store get to use it.

The folks behind Web Albums HD promptly removed the feature, and their app was subsequently approved on the store (which is why it's there now), but before you go spend the $2.99, know that even the devs think that they've "ended up having an inferior product" out there. Of course Apple has definitely limited the functionality of apps in the past by disallowing certain APIs, but now it seems replicated functionality of something they deem Apple's domain can also fall under their banhammer.

Categories

iPad

We've heard all kinds of reasons for rejected apps on the App Store, but this one seems new to us. An iPad app called Web Albums HD has...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

43 Comments

Filter by:
Silas Denyer

Apple did NOT "invent" this gesture, or at least did not do so uniquely. If anyone deserves credit for it, it is Jeff Han, whose demo at TED was such a hit. You can find a video of Jeff's presentation at http://trunc.it/79rcg

Clearly Jeff, Apple, and others all considered the pinch-to-expand gesture to be the most intuitive way to achieve this expansion goal in a multitouch environment. As others have said, that just lends weight to the proposition that Apple should encourage use of consistent gestures, not suppress it!

April 17 2010 at 9:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
set

Does Apple get anything out of this besides looking bad? Why are they pushing whizbang 3rd party apps to other platforms?

April 08 2010 at 10:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to set's comment
Kelmon

Theoretically, they gain a minor competitive advantage by being able to do something in their applications that customers like (maybe - it depends on how important this gesture actually is to users) but which other developers cannot. I highly doubt that this gesture is really that important but I also doubt that they lose very much with this story either.

April 08 2010 at 11:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TVGenius

Interesting, because the Facebook app has the same functionality...

April 08 2010 at 8:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
RobbyT

Considering that all developers ride on the back of Apple's tens, probably hundreds of thousands of man years of endeavour with Xcode and the SDK, have access to an excellent worldwide distribution system, and might receive thousands of dollars of free marketing out of the blue, it isn't too much to expect that now and then Apple might like to hold on to their unique and original ideas for a while before as always they are copied and imitated.

It was a novel feature, very much a two fingered imitation of how one might spread a few photos out on a table, as such it is patentable.

April 08 2010 at 7:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to RobbyT's comment
Rob

The article mentioned that their implementation was hand-coded. I wonder if OS 4.0 will offer this interface in an API and Apple would like devs to use that implementation for stability and performance reasons. It's really the only good reason I can think of for this decision... I hope one of these developers sue Apple for anti-competitive behavior and just put an end to all this nonsense. I appreciate the fact that apps are reviewed for basic security and stability, but at some point they're going to have to learn to play nice with the other kids.

April 08 2010 at 7:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TIm

They probably wanted to emphasis that the devs did not access a hidden API in the SDK to implement that feature which is something that Apple has repeatedly disapproved apps for. In this case however the issue is the gesture itself that was deemed problematic.

T.

April 08 2010 at 6:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mehdi

Yhis is the true face of Apple, make no mistake, they will restrict anything and everything if they have the power. Steve jobs talking about open standards in web makes my blood boil

April 08 2010 at 5:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Mehdi's comment
Kelmon

Er, I think that's going a bit far, isn't it? If Apple really wanted to be restrictive then they wouldn't have introduced the App Store and web applications would have been banned.

April 08 2010 at 11:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
joshua

They put a lot of work into that app. I think there should be some sort of predesign approval from apple. Then they would not of coded the feature that then had to be removed.

April 08 2010 at 5:12 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kelmon

BOOOO!!!

I think that about covers things. Suffice to say that this action is totally unjustifiable. Does the App Store have any form of appeals process yet to address stupidity like this?

April 08 2010 at 3:29 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Kelmon's comment
Brett

You know, 'Boo' as in 'I'm scaring you' and 'Booo' as in 'That's lame' is very hard to distinguish without the assistance of vocal inflection.

April 08 2010 at 10:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kelmon

Assume it's "Boo" scary when it's Halloween and "Boo" displeasure at other times.

April 08 2010 at 10:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nick

Crap like this is pushing me toward Android, unless the 4.0 announcement tomorrow and the inevitable new hardware knock me off my feet.

If I invested a lot of time into creating an application and paid for the privilege of doing so, I'd be furious if it was rejected for this or any other petty reason.

April 07 2010 at 11:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.