Apple says goodbye to design firm that helped develop some Apple products
The New York Times reports that Apple and SurfaceInk have parted ways after the small Silicon Valley developer showed off a tablet design to some potential clients. Apple obviously didn't like one of its partners demonstrating a product that could become a competitive threat, so out the door they went.The Times quotes founder and Chief Executive Eric Bauswell as saying that SurfaceInk and Apple had "gone separate directions."
SurfaceInk was founded in 1999, and has worked for Apple, Hewlett-Packard and Palm.
Share
Categories
The New York Times reports that Apple and SurfaceInk have parted ways after the small Silicon Valley developer showed off a tablet design...
Add a Comment
I thought that English guy Jonathon Hives or something like that (probably got it wrong but the dude who always features on Apple videos when a new product line or upgrade is released) was responsible for the latest Apple design, especially the Aluminum look....? Can't see how these guys can design for Apple and HP, their products look worlds apart, for a start HP products look generic and outdated....
September 05 2010 at 6:55 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIt never ceases to amaze me at the total lack of business acumen/knowledge/nous by some of the people who frequent this blog!!
working for Apple they would have had to sign some confidentiality/exclusivity agreements no doubt. It would seem that surfaceink are going for broke and yes they knew apple would drop them.
I am surprised that Apple actually hire an outside design team because i'd be vey wary of dealing with a big corp like Apple/Microsoft etc.
did they design the iPhone 4 external antennas?
that would make more sense to me: some companies list the reason for dropping a longtime employee who's performance has degraded (say, due to burnout) as "downsized" or "excess-ed" rather than as "released for cause" so the ex-employee can still find work at another company.
without more info, suppositions on both sides are equally valid: Perhaps Apple can more afford to appear "petty", rather than excessively cruel by labeling SurfaceInk as incompetent?
"Apple obviously didn't like one of its partners demonstrating a product that could become a competitive threat, so out the door they went."
Or, they saw the company would promote itself by outing prototypes and not keeping development secrets.
Or, they really were not doing a good job at whatever they were supposed to be doing.
Or, this is just another case of "we really needed to self-promote ourselves with connecting our name to Apple - even if it is negative.
Or, who knows what the other side of the "story" is.
Guessing and reporting ( or just relating ) at the very highest standards available today.
A little research turned up the tablet that keeps Steve stay awake at night
http://besttabletreview.com/surfaceink-12-1-inch-linux-ubuntu-tablet-pc/
Smart move, Steveo. Nobody out there is going to snap up the services of some farging upstart that makes you guys nervous with their tablet proto.
Certainly not after hearing that they helped you with stuff...
I guess it makes sense that you wouldn't have your (now) competitor designing your products for you.
Anything learned out of R&D (paid for by Apple) could be used in Surfaceink's own products and offered for cheaper without those learning costs.
Maybe there's just not much room for them at Apple, anyway. Between Ive's own design team â and them bringing more and more of their prototyping/manufacturing in-house â their factories home and abroad, I don't know if they need to outsource such an integral part of their offering to another company. Especially to a partner with their eyes on your prize.
Plus their website requires Flash.
August 28 2010 at 7:35 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyMore pettiness from lunatic Jobs...
August 28 2010 at 7:14 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyMaybe the found a better design company?
And it's only petty if you believe everything you read on blogs, which you appear to do.
It's not really that petty. This company likely had insider information and might have used that information in their designs. Perhaps they didn't this time from what Apple could see but who could say that they wouldn't add some stuff in the future. So Apple needed to cut off the supply of information to protect themselves and that meant severing ties. Basic business sense.
August 28 2010 at 12:48 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Verizon Leather Sleeve for Tablets for $4 + free shipping
- Wicked Jaw Breaker Noise-Isolating In-Ear Headphones for $6 + free shipping
- Refurb Apple MacBook Air Laptops: 12" 64GB SSD for $699 + free shipping
- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



11 Comments