Skip to Content

Ouch! Apple dinged for $208.5 million in patent infringement case

You know that nice Cover Flow interface (above) that Apple uses on iDevices, in iTunes, and in Mac OS X? An East Texas Federal Court has ruled that Apple infringed on patents held by Mirror Worlds, a software business started by Yale University computer science professor and Unabomber victim David Gelernter. As a result, the court has ordered Apple to pay Mirror Worlds US$208.5 million in damages. The Time Machine interface, which shows a series of screen or application images "receding" back in time, was also part of the case filed by Mirror Worlds on March 14, 2008.

As Mac Observer has pointed out, many of the Cover Flow and Time Machine concepts of showing files or album covers moving back and forth were in use by Apple in HyperCard stacks many years before Mirror Worlds received patents for the idea. Whether Apple will appeal the verdict or not is unknown at this time.

Apple was granted a patent for Cover Flow in April, 2010, which makes this ruling even more questionable. Mirror Worlds, LLC was disbanded in 2003 due to lack of sales of its software products.

Apple has not made any comments regarding the verdict or a possible appeal.


Categories

Apple

You know that nice Cover Flow interface (above) that Apple uses on iDevices, in iTunes, and in Mac OS X? An East Texas Federal Court has...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

17 Comments

Filter by:
Stuart

Does anyone actually use Cover Flow?

October 05 2010 at 10:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Stuart's comment
E

On my iPhone, yes. It's a pretty easy way to switch between albums. Also, when I'm shuffling songs and it hits a song that I want to listen to the whole album, I'll turn my phone to landscape and select the album. I don't use coverflow on my mac though.

October 05 2010 at 5:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Pete

Someone needs to investigate this Texas court. This is really getting out of hand. Something smells really rotten here.

October 05 2010 at 6:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mezrow

Good thing Apple's appealing this--that court is the most plaintiff-friendly place in the country to file this kind of suit. And I don't believe it was mentioned that this man Gerlenter is famous for something else--being the victim of a Unabomber attack. I have to wonder if this wasn't partially a sympathy verdict. But the fact that Apple HAD patents granted for at least part of the alleged infringement seems like something they could definitely appeal.

October 04 2010 at 5:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ian

Next thing they will do is go after walmary etc. for those big ass books that keep your cd's organized. Lol! Same thing as coverflow if you think about it. I need to find somebody to sue for some dumbass reason. Seems to be all the rage right now.

October 04 2010 at 1:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
msm0511

I smell an appeal. Apple would rather spend more than 208.5 million in court costs, lawyer fees, etc. than to lose this kind of case.

October 04 2010 at 11:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
totoro

The guy who actually invented Apple's implementation definitely did get get "dime one"-he posted on his blog about it when Apple bought it from him.

October 04 2010 at 11:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ecobore

C'mon.. East Texas for Chrissake! Land of the spurious patent suit!!! Apple bought Cover Flow from somebody else in any case!

October 04 2010 at 11:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
IMPMAC

You want to know the quickest way to get rich? This is one of them...

October 04 2010 at 11:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
GLacy

Isn't Windows 7 using something even more similar to the patent drawing that has been posted? Sorry I don't have the link to it.

Did MS pay this guy to use the patent? Did they pay this guy to sue Apple?

October 04 2010 at 11:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
The Iron Giant

This ruling does seem odd, considering Apple purchased CoverFlow a few years back. Why aren't the plaintiffs going after the original developer? Oh yeah, because they're apparently greedy, gamed the system, and know that their target has deep pockets.

Apple shouldn't give this up without a fight.

October 04 2010 at 11:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to The Iron Giant's comment
macserv

I wouldn't think you'll have to wait long for one... it seems like finding prior art for this one would be insanely easy. Then again, who knows? Apple may find that it's cheaper to just pay the man.

October 05 2010 at 1:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.