Skip to Content

Apple considering MagSafe charger on iPad

Here's something to get your mind wondering this Monday afternoon. Patently Apple is reporting that Apple may be considering integrating the MagSafe Power Port to its portable products, like the iPad.

The continuation patent, published on October 7th 2010 by the US Patent and Trademark Office, clearly depicts what looks like an iPhone / iPod touch / iPad with figure 62 revealing what appears to be a power connector. This power connector, expanded upon in greater detail in further diagrams, depicts what appears to be, according to Patently Apple, a MagSafe Power Port. And here at TUAW, we'll concur. It does look remarkably like a MagSafe Power Port.

The MagSafe power adapter and port (first introduced in 2006 and then quietly updated in April of this year), are designed to connect the power cable to your MacBook / Pro / Air magnetically, allowing for a solid connection, but providing an immediate disconnection if the power cord is strongly pulled on. The idea is to stop your MacBook from flying off the table when you accidentally trip over the power cord.

I can't imagine Apple introducing a lone power port for the iPad, but I can see the advantage in adding the MagSafe's magnetic qualities to, say, the 30-pin connector currently used with all iPods, iPhones and iPads. What do you think, readers? I know I've yanked my iPhone off the desk by inadvertently pulling on the 30-pin connector cable. A release mechanism like the MagSafe would certainly come in handy.

Apple first filed this patent in June of this year. With this follow up continuation patent being filed in October, Patently Apple seems to suggest that Apple maybe trying to rush through the patent for an upcoming product release. But, with patents, it's hard to know whether these ideas will actually see the light of day in released products. It could just be another case of Apple securing its intellectual property.

Categories

Accessories

Here's something to get your mind wondering this Monday afternoon. Patently Apple is reporting that Apple may be considering integrating...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

16 Comments

Filter by:
Barton

One problem I would have with putting MagSafe on mobile iDevices (iPhone, iPod, iPad) is that since the port on the machine is magnetic, it would probably attract debris from inside bags and pockets into the MagSafe port.

November 05 2010 at 6:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Specialized

Its not an iPad!

It's an iMac that can become un-docked/mounted from the stand to become a portable tablet.

With the touch screen iMac patents from a few weeks ago I think this is very viable in the future.

October 11 2010 at 10:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Eric

Since the patent itself refers (by name) to MagSafe, I don't think it's a USB port or mini DisplayPort connector.

October 11 2010 at 5:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
prancinghorse

forget the magsafe... doesn't anyone think it could be that mini display port or whatever its called?

October 11 2010 at 4:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Billin

Does this mean Apple is finally, finally, FINALLY going to license the MagSafe connector so we can have 3rd party chargers? I'm still waiting for the MagSafe tip to use with my iGo.

October 11 2010 at 4:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
iPhone user

Magsafe + LightPeak = iPad sync of the future?

And no, wireless sync is not the iPad / iPhone sync of the future. Wireless sync is totally useless for two reasons. 1) You could walk out of range of your wi-fi in the middle of syncing an iPod touch. 2) You need to plug your iDevice in to charge it up anyway, so you'll always need a cable or dock. (And inductive charging is so inefficient that Apple would catch hell from Greenpeace.)

Having said that, I think it should be possible to make syncing interruption-recoverable. Even OS updates could be interruptible as long as syncing could be resumed from the exact point of the interruption. This means a precise byte-count of the transferred data or something like that would be needed to resume from the exact point of the interruption. It's not rocket science. But it would make a Magsafe iPad connection feasible.

October 11 2010 at 4:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rdnymllnsktr

Looks similar to a USB port, but either way, the diagram does not CLEARLY look like an iPod Touch/iPhone/iPad.

To me, when I first viewed it, I saw the screen part of the rumored touchscreen iMac, off the base.

October 11 2010 at 2:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kelly Spongberg

I would love magsafe power ports for charging all my idevices. When my family gets together, everyone is trying to charge iphone and ipads all over the house, and the different charge rates...

October 11 2010 at 2:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TheCastro

Clearly a USB port.

October 11 2010 at 2:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to TheCastro's comment
Mr Lizard

Should have gone to SpecSavers

October 11 2010 at 3:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
thecase

Unless the magnetic connection is much weaker than that on MacBooks, I really don't see the magsafe accidental disconnect working too well on iPhones and iPods.

October 11 2010 at 2:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.