Skip to Content

Esquire Magazine comes to the iPad in style

It's been interesting watching the evolution of electronic magazines as they adapt to a changing world where digital delivery slowly replaces more traditional methods of distribution. Clearly all the kinks aren't worked out yet (witness the Adobe security issue that's led to free magazines and newspapers for some iPad users) but change is on the march.

Esquire has released a US $4.99 issue that is fun to read and great to look at. Esquire first appeared way back in 1932 when the US was in a depression. People were searching for something diverting, and the glossy magazine pointed to a lifestyle many could only dream about.

I've been reading and examining this new issue for a couple of days and I pretty much like what I see. There is an innovative 'moving cover' including a welcome to the issue with actor Javier Bardem. There are articles about fashion with 360 degree views of clothing, and there are videos, charts and the kinds of illustrations that have made the Esquire print edition famous for years.

To read Esquire you scroll sideways to get to the next article, then scroll down to read it. It's intuitive, and the display is smooth.

I have a couple of nits to pick though. First, the issue is designed to be read in portrait view. You can flip your iPad to landscape, but there will be no response from the magazine. Like many people, I have a case that is designed to stand up in landscape mode, so reading the magazine is a bit of a pain. Inexplicably, one feature, an animated look at the construction of the World Trade Center, requires landscape view. I couldn't locate a table of contents, although if you tap the screen you get a scrolling list of each article. There is no search function, so getting back to something you want to read again is no picnic. The iTunes store blurb advertises a way to share articles but I couldn't find it. You can use the iPad copy function for text, but not for graphics. There may be a way to email articles, but it is invisible to me.

Nits aside, I found reading Esquire an enjoyable and and at times a liberating experience. Over time, I'm finding I prefer to consume written media on an electronic device instead of the printed page. Esquire has been very innovative over the years, and this evolution of the magazine is no exception. I'm still not happy with magazine pricing. No matter what the publishers say, distributing electronically simply does not cost as much as sending out dead trees. Those savings need to be passed on to readers.



Categories

iPad

It's been interesting watching the evolution of electronic magazines as they adapt to a changing world where digital delivery slowly...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

4 Comments

Filter by:
lak

Nice app but I have a full subscription of a year for like $9 through Zinio. It works great.

October 13 2010 at 12:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Britboyj27

I used to subscribe to Esquire. I'd do it again on an iPad, but I'm not paying per-issue.

October 13 2010 at 11:53 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Steven Sokulski

While it IS true that publishing on a digital medium removes the costs of printing, packaging and mailing from the equation, publisher's (like the one I work for) are still tasked with paying to develop the app, maintain the app, and in many cases pay additional design costs to create multiple versions of the magazine. (Print, landscape iPad, and portrait iPad). To be honest, the savings disappear rather quickly. The idea that printing and mailing account for a large portion of production costs is a misunderstanding. Consider the costs of many of these high-profile photo shoots that take place for a particular issue of Esquire, for example. Content is, by far, the most expensive part of printing a magazine. This is followed closely by design in most cases.

What I do think is missing from most of these offerings, however, is a subscription model that would allow the high per issue cost to be deadened by a one- or two-year price. Some have it, but many still do not.

October 13 2010 at 10:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thomas O' Malley

I agree. It's actually really nice. The only thing I was missing, was the possibility to actually turn pages the old fashioned way. And yes the price is too high. 3.99 would be ok with me.

October 12 2010 at 9:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.