Woz speaks up on net neutrality (video)
After the FCC issued its ruling, Woz praised the FCC for enacting some net neutrality rules to help keep the internet open, but criticized the government agency for not applying these standards to wireless broadband. Wireless broadband is the internet of the future and, sometimes, the only internet connection for those who live in outlying areas. This emerging network should be subject to the same rules and regulations as its wired counterpart. We embedded his 10-minute interview after the break and you can read his full written statement here.
Thanks go to Josh Stearns for sending this in!
Share
Categories
Steve Wozniak stepped up the plate earlier this week and spoke out on net neutrality. In both a written statement and a quick...
Add a Comment
If you mandate net neutrality except for wireless, won't the internet providers have incentive to switch customers to wireless service where they can do whatever they want?
I am not saying they will - but it seems like the wrong priority. Net neutrality shouldn't just be a law, there needs to be a whole system in place that breeds competition amongst internet providers.
As it is in most places internet service is either a monopoly or controlled by one or two.
I imagine a system where you separate the physical lines from the service. Then anyone can provide the service and rent the lines for a fixed price. Maybe the lines should actually be state-owned, like roads. Not saying I developed a comprehensive solution in the 30 seconds since I started writing this post but there's got to be a better way!
I agree that the current system is completely screwed up. The service providers are merely government sanctioned monopolies; if the government had not sanctioned them, they'd currently be investigating them for anti-trust practices.
The real answer is not net neutrality but service neutrality (though I hope that phrase doesn't catch on, prompting new laws that force all ISPs to have the exact same offerings/price). If congress really wanted to protect people from harmful practices, they'd promote competition to force providers to really make people happy. When it comes to business, potential loss of customers/revenue is the ultimate consumer protection.
Why didn't he have the balls to single out the ones who voted for this? It was a clear vote along party lines with the Republican appointees not only voting against it in the end but from the beginning questioning whether the FCC has the Constitutional authority to do this at all. The one Republican rep even put out numerous times during the debates and again prior to the vote when asking for a delay that "we are not the Congress, we cannot legislate". Name one federal agency that has ever gained and then relinquished power? They all get bigger and want more power at our expense until they ruin it.
Just like this time last year with healthcare, the bailouts, GM, the 'stimulus', DREAM, START, etc., why do Democrats try to rush or sneak stuff in the middle of the night or when they think nobody is paying attention? When legislators, the public and most everybody else wanted to question the FCC's authority and demand a delay in this vote, why'd they call for a hasty vote? People only act like that when they have something to hide or don't want to get called out because they know they're wrong.
Why is it the Democrats do the most to take away/abuse our freedoms but everybody blames the Republicans?
"Why didn't he have the balls to single out the ones who voted for this?"
I think you misunderstood Woz's stance on this. He wants net neutrality, he was glad it passed, he wants more regulation.
"Woz singled out the telecommunication companies for their deceptive practices and monopolistic behaviors"
Did anyone single out the federal government for their deceptive practices and monopolistic behaviors? Net neutrality in its proposed form is just putting a new fox in charge of the fox's den.
The unfortunate fact is that this is just the start of control of the internet by the FCC. Going forward they will control more and more of it. Consequently the internet will become more and more expensive for everyone and be less and less free (as in freedom of speech). Sad.
December 22 2010 at 12:09 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI want democracy.
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate_accountability/history_corporations_us.html
We already have the best Government that money can buy....
December 22 2010 at 1:28 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIf Woz wants to have a significant impact he needs to distill his thoughts into a single coherent message, a stump speech, if you like. His letter and this interview were all over the place with a mix of related and unrelated messages.
I get you Woz, but my concern is the vast number of others that do not. I do not want the thoughts of Woz to be dismissed as the ramblings of a crazy genius. Connect the dots Woz.
This is a case of the 'Golden Rule'. The big communications companies have the clout to make sure that they can maximize their profits by charging more for higher speeds and restrict or eliminate their competitors from having equal access to the consumers.
The new Congress, with Republicans in the majority in the House of Representatives, will make sure that their biggest contributors, the communications giants, will get what they want.
Golden Rule = He who has the gold, rules. Or, money talks and BS walks.
Woz == computer genius
Woz != expert on policy for government control of the Internet
Look at him in that suit. So un-Woz-ly.
Run for Mayor Woz!
Deals of the Day
more deals- Apple Wireless Bluetooth Keyboard for $40 + $8 s&h
- Refurb Mac Pro Xeon Quad-Core 2.8GHz Workstation for $1,150 + $38 s&h, more
- Used Apple iPad 32GB Wi-Fi Tablet for $200 + free shipping
- Apple iPod nano Multi-Touch 8GB MP3 Player for $100 + $8 s&h
- Cases for New iPad at HandHeldItems: Extra 20% off, $2 credit, from $3 + $3 s&h
- $15 Apple iTunes Gift Card for $8 for new Saveology customers
14 Comments