Skip to Content

Apple sues Nokia in London over touch-screen scroll patent

Apple has sued Finland's Nokia over claims that one of Nokia's European patents for scrolling on a touch screen is not valid. The suit was filed in London's High Court earlier this week, and is the latest in the legal back-and-forth between Nokia and Apple.

In December of 2010, Nokia filed claims in three European countries, alleging that Apple infringed on 13 additional patents, in addition to 24 patents already descried in the existing US and International Trade Commission filings. To date, Nokia has opened file claims on four patents in the UK High Court, seven patents in district court in Dusseldorf, five in Mannheim and two in the Hague. This latest suit from Apple challenges a filing made by Nokia against Apple in Dusseldorf in September of 2010.

Nokia spokesman Mark Durrant sounded confident in an email sent to Bloomberg. "Nokia is confident that all of the 37 patents it has asserted against Apple" [are valid], he said. "We are examining the filing and will take whatever actions are needed to protect our rights." Meanwhile, Apple declined to comment.

We suspect this won't be over for a long time.

Categories

Apple

Apple has sued Finland's Nokia over claims that one of Nokia's European patents for scrolling on a touch screen is not valid. The suit was...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

5 Comments

Filter by:
Jrbonnette

More on topic, 37 patents? Holy crap. I know it's been said before, but this is beyond ridiculous. Especially since most of those patents were filed for approval and granted after everyone was already using the ideas, not to mention it isn't always the case that the first company to use an idea is the one to get the patent. Again, broken record here, but this system needs an overhaul.

January 21 2011 at 2:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thomas Platt

Actually, jrbonette, I hadn't really given any thought to other place names and the fact that most (apparently) are not in use in their original forms when used internationally. Suddenly I feel like such a small man, a small man indeed. The mind, as all things, will atrophy when it is not properly exercised. I am happy due to your comment. Thank you, in this case I certainly needed putting in my place. I'll think twice before posting a daft comment next time.

January 21 2011 at 1:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thomas Platt

There is no such place as Dusseldorf. There is Düsseldorf, spelled Duesseldorf if you don't have the ability to include an umlaut in your word processor. Then again, following English usage, you'd get lost going from Hamelin to Munich, since neither really exists in Germany either. Now, if you were to drive from Hameln to München, you might not have such troubles. I'm sorry, I just don't understand how it's that difficult when we don't seem to see the need to screw up Spanish place names in such ways.

January 21 2011 at 12:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Thomas Platt's comment
Jrbonnette

And yet, we don't call Japan Nihon, or Italy Italia, not to mention that Rome is Roma, Florence is Firenze... But then again Koreans term for America isn't America either. It's something like
Migouk. Something tells me someone needs to lighten up.

January 21 2011 at 12:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Thomas Platt

Jrbonette, perhaps we should call all places by their correct names. Surely this would encourage international brotherhood.

January 21 2011 at 12:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.